- Joined
- 28 May 2006
- Posts
- 9,985
- Reactions
- 2
Prospector said:Hm, if a snake bit my child on the lip I think maybe I would have had some medical attention. If his intention was to show his children not to be afraid of wildlife, then that is the ultimate irony, isn't it. Because it is normal for us to be afraid of it - nature's way of protecting us methinks.
I just find it ironic that his vision was to teach about about the beauty of wildlife and to respect it, yet he did some very non-conservationist things in order to get the crowds attention, and in the end it was maybe his possible lack of respect shown to wildlife that cost him his life, and his children their father.
To many he is a hero; but children dont look at their dad's as heroes for what they do, they are hero's to their kids just because they are 'Dad'.
I appreciate that he has also spent a lot of money in reclaiming land etc etc, but well, I guess I just see his death as a tragic loss to those kids and didnt need to happen.
dubiousinfo said:I remember reading some years ago of a fisherman who hooked one on his line & when he pulled one into the boat, the ray got him in the chest also & killed him.
Remind me MC, who is our PM again?Market Cap said:.. and everyone in US, ..knew and loved Steve Irwin - even though hardly anyone knew who our prime minister was...
Germaine - I dare you to get into one of those enclosures that contain Steve's beloved crocodiles and say that !!2020hindsight said:I guess we could all speculate on the impact of Germaine's passing :
had she made the comments while he was still alive she wouldnt have gotten any press coverage,she is attention grabbing. in the long term this has got to bad for her(reminds me of mundines 9/11 comment) she also said on TV tonight that he tormented animals.....well i think the animals lost a great voice in irwin. good luck to her future prospects in australia and the word is RESPECTJulia said:It's interesting how someone's death makes such a difference to the way comments about them are viewed.
Had Germaine Greer made her remarks while Steve Irwin was still alive and well, I doubt that anyone would have made any sort of fuss about it.
She's entitled to her opinion. Her timing was tasteless. I just find it rather odd that when someone dies (and especially someone whose life involved doing very dangerous things) he ipso facto becomes a complete saint who may not be criticised in any way at all.
Have a go at Germaine Greer for her timing and insensitivity by all means.
But I don't see the need to vilify her as a person for expressing her opinion about someone.
Julia
Like - as if you can reason with Germaine - like as if you can get a word in edgewise lol. Nothing against you J, but I disagree with you on the rights of Germaine to express her lopsided opinion on his contribution to nature - probably 1,000,000 times that of the average mortal. As for the timing, I'd prefer that she expressed them in about 20 years - better still postumously.Julia said:....Have a go at Germaine Greer for her timing and insensitivity by all means. But I don't see the need to vilify her as a person for expressing her opinion about someone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?