- Joined
- 5 January 2007
- Posts
- 384
- Reactions
- 0
CRK has announced a scrip bid for Shannon SHA. On the plus side, SHA has some good hits such as these, from the Dec 06 qtly:
GOLD: (maximum depth 72 metres)
· SRRC 33 44m @ 2.24g/t Au inc. 5 metres @ 8.50g/t Au
· SRRC 34 31m @ 1.68g/t Au and 7 metres @ 2.78g/t Au
· SRRC 40 3m ..@ 24.7g/t Au and 6 metres @ 1.85g/t Au
and some reasonably long, but not fantastically high-grade nickel hits, such as:
· SNP 19 19m @ 0.63% Ni
· SNP 17 7m ..@ 0.81% Ni
· SNP 16 6m ..@ 0.73% Ni
On the minus side, Frank Carr is the largest shareholder in SHA (40%) so this might just be a way for him to cash out. BUT, he's also the largest shareholder in CRK with 46% of the stock. So it wouldn't make a lot of sense for him to do anything that's bad for CRK. The other reasons given for the bid seem reasonble to me, such as saving in admin costs, listing fees, ability to manage combined drill programmes and ultimately develop the resources using a centrally-located processing facility for both resources (they are all located in the same locality).
GOLD: (maximum depth 72 metres)
· SRRC 33 44m @ 2.24g/t Au inc. 5 metres @ 8.50g/t Au
· SRRC 34 31m @ 1.68g/t Au and 7 metres @ 2.78g/t Au
· SRRC 40 3m ..@ 24.7g/t Au and 6 metres @ 1.85g/t Au
and some reasonably long, but not fantastically high-grade nickel hits, such as:
· SNP 19 19m @ 0.63% Ni
· SNP 17 7m ..@ 0.81% Ni
· SNP 16 6m ..@ 0.73% Ni
On the minus side, Frank Carr is the largest shareholder in SHA (40%) so this might just be a way for him to cash out. BUT, he's also the largest shareholder in CRK with 46% of the stock. So it wouldn't make a lot of sense for him to do anything that's bad for CRK. The other reasons given for the bid seem reasonble to me, such as saving in admin costs, listing fees, ability to manage combined drill programmes and ultimately develop the resources using a centrally-located processing facility for both resources (they are all located in the same locality).