- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Posts
- 1,941
- Reactions
- 2
I guess it makes sense that only puts were exercised - it seems unlikely anyone would want to exercise a call over a stock that is suspended and not likely to trade again in a hurry.
For the put writers thats really part of the risk of a short position - effecitvely the equivalent of the stock price going to zero.
I assume that anyone that exercised would still have to have delivered stock - which mean they'd have to organise a stock loan I assume if they didn't hold stock?
If trading was opened up there would have been plenty of stock holders prepared to pay a hefty premium to get a relatively immediate return on their holding (albeit meagre) as well as the benefit of locking in the capital loss by transferring the stock away.
So opening the options for trading on the day of expiry provides an opportunity to allow the market to price the likelihood of the stock returning to the boards or not and at what price if it does.
Its really the autoexercise that is the main gotcha - something to be aware of for a long position holder.
For the put writers thats really part of the risk of a short position - effecitvely the equivalent of the stock price going to zero.
I assume that anyone that exercised would still have to have delivered stock - which mean they'd have to organise a stock loan I assume if they didn't hold stock?
If trading was opened up there would have been plenty of stock holders prepared to pay a hefty premium to get a relatively immediate return on their holding (albeit meagre) as well as the benefit of locking in the capital loss by transferring the stock away.
So opening the options for trading on the day of expiry provides an opportunity to allow the market to price the likelihood of the stock returning to the boards or not and at what price if it does.
Its really the autoexercise that is the main gotcha - something to be aware of for a long position holder.