- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,296
- Reactions
- 17,527
According to https://www.missionaustralia.com.au/domestic-and-family-violence-statistics#:~:text=Domestic and family violence in Australia statistics&text=1 in 6 women have,it is 1 in 16.&text=75% of victims of domestic,reported the perpetrator as female.">www.missionaustralia.com.auOne woman is killed every 9 days by a male.
The actual statistic is one woman every 9 days is killed by a current or former partner and one man every month is killed by a current or former partner. Based on that statistic, 77% of the victims killed are women, 23% are men.
Of all domestic violence, 75% reported the perpetrator as male and 25% reported the perpetrator as female.
So why only fix it for some?
From: https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/population-groups/lgbtiqa-people
Referring to LGBTQIA+ people, of the respondents to the 2019 Private Lives 3 survey:
49% had experienced sexual assault.
61% had experienced violence from an intimate partner.
And yet this group is being effectively excluded from the discussion despite the statistics being considerably worse than for the general population.
So my point is, why not seek to end violence period? Why this notion that it's just fine as long as it's any situation other than a male perpetrator and female victim? Why exclude ~25% of the problem?
The only reason I can come up with is someone's playing politics rather than genuinely seeking to fix the problem once and for all. There's no reason to exclude some victims and some perpetrators - just deal with the lot. This isn't an issue that ought be used as a political tool.
![Two Cents :2twocents :2twocents](https://www.aussiestockforums.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/twocents.gif)
Last edited: