Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,769
- Reactions
- 10,526
Sorry to p on the party but my latest information is that he is wavering on whether to stay or go. Its his style I guess.
gg
gg
Sorry to p on the party but my latest information is that he is wavering on whether to stay or go. Its his style I guess.
gg
Hi Julia,
I think they could of (gratuitous Julia feather ruffling)
Then there's the larger problem of why he wasn't drafted earlier. After more than a decade in the spotlight, he is still perceived as a spineless jerk with a smirk, who lacked the gumption to challenge. He should stop wavering and wave good-bye, although he probably couldn't decide whether he wants soldiers or squares with his eggs without Howard's permission.
Yep, the smirk is a perceptual problem. But in regard to the spineless bit; I don't think that's quite fair.
Sun Tzu in The Art of War admonishes military generals to have the battle won before the first attack. At no stage did Costello ever have the numbers, so why challenge? It would have been suicide. To take the leadership after the election defeat was always going to be a poisoned chalice and Pete was ####ing wise to step out of the way.
Similar situation over here in Blighty, but handled completely differently. bLiar was hugely popular with Crash Gordon in a similar position to Costello, as Chancellor of the Exchequer; and his eyes on the leadership.
But the stupid bstard did manage to elbow bLiar out of the way...AT THE WORST POSSIBLE TIME, right as the economy was about to roll over into the abyss.
Perhaps he was too stupid and ambitious at any cost to see that. Perhaps bLiar was smart enough to see it coming and jumped out of the way. Either way Gordon McBean in the most unpopular PM EVER. Whether or not it's his fault that the economy is toast (it is) is irrelevant, it was appalling timing.
Pete ain't that dumb and I would have thought much less of him as a politician if he had picked up the baton.
That's my view.
Agree, but its not a bad idea every now and then to have the other mob in, to make people realise how lucky they were and to let the left have a go at putting their ideas into the marketplace. Seeing Keating this week promenading brought back all the bad memories.
gg
I agree, timing will be important, but I'm still not sure Costello is the man at any time. Just not a people person.I sincerely hope Costello comes back to lead the Liberals, but I think now is too soon. Let Rudd go on for a while longer without any serious opposition, give him time to become increasingly unpopular. Then bring Costello back maybe 6 to 12 months before the next election.
There something particularly pathetic about ex-leaders still seeking the limelight. John Howard is one of the few who hasn't done this.
Malcolm Fraser is especially notable for his constant carping about both sides of government.
And John Hewson failed miserably as Leader but now appears to regard himself as an expert on everything.
QUOTE]
Yes, it really is quite pathetic to see ex pollies still mouthing off on TV as if they're experts on everything. They just can't seem to comprehend that if they were voted out of office, that means the public is not particularly interested in their views.
I wouldn't be too sure that John Howard doesn't do it though......I've seen him on TV having his say a few times over the last several months.
Keating, Fraser, and more recently John Hewson, are notorious for it. And Whitlam too, before he got too old, although he still has an odd spruik.
Um didnt costello as a treasurer already send our economy into a tailspin with his lapsadaical financial management and irresponsible ecomomic planning ?
Costello doesn't have a prayer nor the ticker. He's never challenged for anything, and even now he would only assume the leadership if it was handed to him on a platter. Many have confused his term as treasurer during the largest boom in memory as evidence of good management. I disagree. The big economic changes that have placed Australia in a position to prosper from the boom are:
1) Floating the dollar. Find an economist who disagrees!
2) Decentralising wages
3) Tying wage increases to productivity following a temporary wage freeze to stem the wages breakout that occured under Howard as treasurer
4) Compulsory super to cope with the costs of an ageing population (Johnny cut the progress short)
5) The establishment of a 2-3% inflation target range that has now been adopted in the rest of the developed world
These changes sound like they originate from the conservative side of politics? Check the history books. The sum total of the coalition's reforms were to introduce a GST and go gangbusters with middle class welfare and ridiculous spending. The reserve was screaming at them for years to stop fueling inflation, and by extension, interest rates. We know how that story ended as well.
As well as being a lousy treasurer, polling has indicated that he is very clearly unelectable. Surely the coalition can come up with someone, anyone, to put Nelson out of ours and his misery.
Keating was always a grubby little individual and still is. His exceptional talent for vindictiveness and nastiness is in strong contrast to the incompetence he demonstrated as treasurer and Prime Minister. To see Keating on TV throwing stones at Howard and Costello - two men who were always streets ahead of him in terms of both character and ability - is almost too much to bear.
I sincerely hope Costello comes back to lead the Liberals, but I think now is too soon. Let Rudd go on for a while longer without any serious opposition, give him time to become increasingly unpopular. Then bring Costello back maybe 6 to 12 months before the next election.
In my post from the previous page, I provided quite a few examples of significant structural economic reforms initiated during the Labor years. You haven't actually provided any evidence of productive structural reform. Strangely dificult task, given he was there for 11 years. The best that can be said of Costello is that whilst he only kept the seat warm during a boom, at least he didn't start sniffing other people's seats like the WA bloke.
In my post from the previous page, I provided quite a few examples of significant structural economic reforms initiated during the Labor years. You haven't actually provided any evidence of productive structural reform. Strangely dificult task, given he was there for 11 years. The best that can be said of Costello is that whilst he only kept the seat warm during a boom, at least he didn't start sniffing other people's seats like the WA bloke.
hey ggskint mate, You can post all the economic waffle that you wish, but the bottom line is that many of my mates ... etc
As I've always maintained, Labor winning is the best thing for the conservatives.
It will mean the economy tanks on Labor's watch, meanwhile the Libs can have the necessary and cleansing catharsis of ratbags, wasters, dunderheads and scoundrels from the front bench.
Even if it takes two terms, the party will be all the better for it.
And I still think Pete would make a fine PM.
hey gg
are they the same mates who had "the good oil" that Costello would take up the leadership position?
Conservatives? I'd hardly call the libs "conservatives" and as far Kevin Rudd being the most conservative ALP leader in history, what bollocks! I think politics is in a sad state at the moment, with a bunch of spineless muppets on both sides taking no position other than that of public opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?