There is no need to apologize Julia, there is no angst or ill-will at all intended on my behalf. I thought that your comment about Ned Kelly was very interesting and that is why I replied to it as a separate idea (it was not my intention at all to focus on the element of it being interpreted as derogative to Australian culture, but more of the nuance of it being relevant to the context of this debate). I enjoy finding connections between the past and the present and it is often said that history rhymes, and is fairly cylical or thematically repetitive, so it is sometimes worth making unusual connections, especially out of context.If I've offended you I'm entirely happy to apologise.
[
That is fine by me too so why don't you ask Rumpy to delete this thread altogether instead of trying discredit the Liberal Party.......There seems to be a lack of principle here.
Oh, there is no lack of principle, simply a desire for balance. There is a thread about about ICAC's enquiries into union corruption, so are we supposed to ignore corruption elsewhere ?
We could amalgamate everything into a "Corruption in Politics" thread, that would be fine by me.
[
How about we just condemn all corruption and stop trying the "they're badder than my team" argument. Most of us don't see much to distinguish either party from the other when it comes to corruption and jobs for mates.
That is fine by me too so why don't you ask Rumpy to delete this thread altogether instead of trying discredit the Liberal Party.......There seems to be a lack of principle here.
Oh, there is no lack of principle, simply a desire for balance. There is a thread about about ICAC's enquiries into union corruption, so are we supposed to ignore corruption elsewhere ?
We could amalgamate everything into a "Corruption in Politics" thread, that would be fine by me.
Extraordinary post after your continued vitriol of the greens and Labor Party
Irony and self awareness aren't noco's strong points.
Sydboy was referring to corruption in politics on both sides of the major parties....The Royal Commission into union corruption is another issue and is completely divorced from the Liberal Party but may not exclude the Labor Party.
Sydboy was referring to corruption in politics on both sides of the major parties....The Royal Commission into union corruption is another issue and is completely divorced from the Liberal Party but may not exclude the Labor Party.
It’s not as if the Herald hasn’t been banging on for years about the pervasive influence-peddling inside the NSW Liberal Party, with its fake branches, stacked preselections, abuse of process, factional goons and subculture of turning politics into profit.
Generally the most corrupt in any organising are at the top, the ones with the power to take advantage of their positions.
I'm not surprised the Sirumpy is nervous.
ROFL
What have I got to be nervous about ? I'm retired so the whole lot of them, business , unions , politicians can come down for all I care. I'm just realistic to know that corruption can exist anywhere, from a cop on the beat who protects brothels in return for favours up to the boardrooms and Cabinet Office. So there is no point just putting the spotlight on unions, the whole system has to been cleaned out regularly.
But that is not to claim that there are easy answers. The crimes ICAC deals with are difficult to prove to the demanding standards Australians rightly set; and exposure, whatever its deficiencies, is better than no remedy at all. Moreover, power corrupts; and though the Coalition is far from rivalling the gangrene that permeates Labor, the dreadful price it is paying should reinforce its vigilance against the threat that is posed by the Nick Di Girolamos of this world.
Yet vigilance cannot be enough. Ultimately, corruption is at its most dangerous when governments have large rents to distribute: lavish contracts for some; lucrative sinecures for others. Had Sydney Water been privately owned, Australian Water Holdings would have been more likely to compete on its merits, rather than through tainted gifts and extravagant donations. Equally, were industrial relations regulated mainly by contract, rather than by government fiat, Julia Gillard and Bill Shorten would not have had a slew of powerful and well-paid jobs for their union cronies at the public’s expense.
:topic You can get your rump up off the floor Sirumpy.Perhaps you should start a thread about "a cop on the beat who protects brothels", along with the one about "Corruption in the Greens".
No thanks. As you are too one eyed to accept that there is corruption in your beloved Liberal Party, I'll use this thread to help to educate you whenever possible.
And you too one-eyed to accept that there is corruption in your beloved Greens Party. By "educate" I assume you mean "indocrinate." Fat chance.
By the way, didn't you assume the name of Rumpole because he had only one eye?
NSW has always been a problem for both ALP and Liberals re corruption.
As a long term investor I see no problems with these latest disclosures. Merely a blip in the trend.
Sydney is a very corrupt city, whether ALP or Lib.
Always has been, and probably always will.
It is a matter of degree.
So, high horse value judgements are fine, but useless in relation to NSW.
Eddie Obeid, and MacDonald will get a tiny slap on the wrist and the judgements will be binned, and it will go on. Nothing to do with fairness.
NSW and Sydney in particular is very corrupt, I briefly sat watching it from the inside.
gg
I take some solace from the fact that the various proceedings against MacDonald will likely bankrupt him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?