- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 93
- Reactions
- 4
The Fed is strictly forbidden from adding net financial assets to the private sector. Its role with regard to the private sector is limited to conducting asset swaps of exactly this nature, buying and selling financial assets and paying for them with electronic credits on its balance sheet ledger.
...
It’s the same thing again with the helicopter picture in the post I wrote quoting Ben Bernanke’s 2002 speech saying “The government has a printing press to produce U.S. dollars at essentially no cost“. It’s not literally true that the Fed is actually just throwing money from a helicopter. That’s what the fiscal agent does. Whenever the US government spends, it adds net financial assets to the private sector without a corresponding debit. When the US government taxes, it takes out net financial assets from the private sector without a corresponding addition. It is the fiscal agent that prints money and it is the fiscal agent that would create helicopter money if it ever came to that. I guarantee you, real helicopter money getting into the hands of people who would spend it on goods and services or to reduce debt would have a MUCH bigger impact than QE dollar for dollar. Real helicopter money is not coming. More likely is a giant Hoover to suck up private sector money rather than drop it out of helicopters.
Whenever the US government spends, it adds net financial assets to the private sector without a corresponding debit.
When the US government taxes, it takes out net financial assets from the private sector without a corresponding addition.
The debt ceiling is little more than a nominal amount that a bunch of lawyers (read: politicians) have created. It has no real bearing on the US economy unless they decide to play chicken when it comes time to raising it.
The biggest risk to the US economy is that debt/GDP cannot continue to increase.
This presumes the Govt has a surplus to pay cash for the asset---it doesnt its adding to debt.
Its just using its giant credit card. Bonds on issue!
It has increased from a few trillion to around 17 trillion in around 10 yrs so that has no real bearing????
Another say 10 trillion ---no problems?
The biggest risk to the US economy is that debt/GDP cannot continue to increase.
You've completely missed the point of what he's saying. And I mean completely and utterly.
Nope - don't think this is right is it?OK
It buys Bank Bonds to release capital to banks..
Nope - don't think this is right is it?
So what happens is the Fed decides it wants to buy a bond. Using the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s trading desk, the Fed makes a trade. It receives bonds that its bank counterparty owns and gives its bank counterparty money credit of equivalent value. The key here is that the money used to purchase these bonds was created as an electronic ledger entry solely for the purpose of acquiring the bonds. The Fed ‘printed money’ and conducted a swap of that money for existing financial assets. That’s what quantitative easing is.
My understanding of the latest Q/E ("Operation Twist") is that they are buying-back longer-term government bonds and simultaneously selling some of the shorter-dated issues it already held in order to bring down long-term interest rates.
Are we talking about something different? This stuff confuses me at the best of times.
Is this the start of the big decline, or just another bump?
OK
It buys Bank Bonds to release capital to banks.
Which is fine as long as the bank doesnt do a Freddie Mac.
All of a sudden your asset isnt an asset but a liability and the bond is worth jack.
It has a liability in the money it gave in return for the Bond it recieved.
If it cant get re paid!!!
With a banking system which needs Govt intervention to stop it collapsing
the idea that the Fed can continue infinitum with this idea is ---urr flawed at best and suicidal at worst.
Ill get back on this Mc L Im tied up on tenders sorry---
Thanks for your example re CBA.To me, investing in shares is about managing risk. This is not something I have been great at doing but something I am hoping I am getting smarter at.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?