As I have stated ad nauseum, the focus of the Moonbats and Climate Nazis (to indulge in the puerile AGWer tactic credibility attack via ad homeinem) of on CO2 is all wrong.
Here is one small example:
http://clubs.ccsu.edu/recorder/editorial/print_item.asp?NewsID=188
The world's source for global temperature record admits it's lost or destroyed all the original data that would allow a third party to construct a global temperature record. The destruction (or loss) of the data comes at a convenient time for the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) in East Anglia - permitting it to snub FoIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests to see the data.
The CRU has refused to release the raw weather station data and its processing methods for inspection - except to hand-picked academics - for several years. Instead, it releases a processed version, in gridded form.
Smurf notes once again that the coal miners, dam builders, factory operators and most others who upset the greens have always been very willing to let the general public see their facts and figures, indeed such information has generally formed the basis of their arguments.Here is something that absolutely reeks of data manipulation.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/13/cru_missing/
This is a very bad smell coming from the rotten core of the AGW hypothesis.
GG,Just an update on climate change/weather.
We had a high of 26 today and there is a predicted low of 14.
Presently it is 18.
I know it is 18 now, I have to put a light jumper on.
I knew it was 26 as it was quite hot during the day, after a few weeks of cooler weather.
I do not know if it will be a low of 14. But expect it to be so, as it was last night. But I may be wrong.
Warmeners using computer forecasts could not predict what my weather would be like in 2 weeks time, any more than they could in 50 or 100 or 200 years time.
The evidence doesn't stack up.
gg
Here is something that absolutely reeks of data manipulation.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/13/cru_missing/
This is a very bad smell coming from the rotten core of the AGW hypothesis.
This is a very bad smell coming from the rotten core of the AGW hypothesis.
The masses are more likely to accept a doctrine which plays on peoples fears. Those people driving AGWism have obviously learnt well from the study of the growths and acceptance of Nazism and Communism.
It seems obvious that the drivers of the global brainwashing have an ulterior motive, but have there been any forensic studies done on what this motive is?
It seems we are not alone in our theories.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25401759-5000117,00.html
Would be nice to have the truth bandied around every now and again so we can make an informed decision.
It seems we are not alone in our theories.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25401759-5000117,00.html
Would be nice to have the truth bandied around every now and again so we can make an informed decision.
GG,
Do yo think barometer changes stipulate weather changes of the insane or taxable opportunities of the undebateable?
I heard the Chinese went to the north pole hundreds of years agao and found no ice. Any info on this ? Anyone or two?
Snake, argue logically on this mate.
Whenever the warmeners get frustrated like the godbotherers they go on the fatwa.
If I am unable to predict weather 2 days hence, how can you, do so, fifty or two hundred years hence.
Penny Wong has it wrong.
gg
I'm trying to see past the poor grammar and sentence construction, however:
What is a "warmeners" and "godbotherers"? I assume you mean a God bother, or God bothers, however the "warmeners" is one that needs explanation.
Why can’t you predict the weather for more than 2 days forward - not hence? Do you not have the equipment? Is it broken, or is this one of those statements like: all male hair-dressers are gay, no substance to the statement yet it makes you sound cool at the BBQ.
The one thing that politics and politicans lack is creedability. It wont come back - if it ever was there - yet for anyone to take the smallest interest it has to have creedibility, and suggesting people like WT just makes it more of a joke than it needs to be.
__________________
I went to University, so I know how to pretend to be clever
I know you are only pretending to be clever, but that's no excuse for your rude and sarcastic comments about another poster. Before you start criticising others you might put you own house in order. This is a quote from an earlier post of yours;
Your credibility is destroyed.
Don't let Garpal Gumnut get to you, stocksonblock.
He's just poking with a stick to get a response.
He would have you believe that he is the classical northern Queenslander, 10 years behind and thinks the earth is flat.
He is really after a laugh. In fact he is really a closet greenie growing magic mushrooms in his back yard. This whole threads a joke, not too many take it seriously.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?