- Joined
- 28 September 2007
- Posts
- 1,472
- Reactions
- 8
Precisely what the Liberals have done and Labor is promising. The same outcome is also implied, albeit in a somewhat hidden manner, by Greens policies.
Precisely, Rudd has gone from battle street to the top of his game, to me another great Aussie success story, with such personal success he will be sure to deliver on Nationwide LONGTERM success.
.. Recession and Labour?? Don't rightly know, but I do remember the clout that the unions had during previous Laobour Govt's.. and we really don't need to go there again IMHO..
My .2c anyway
I'll see your 2c and raise you 2c.
Let me declare at the start that I am a Liberal voter, but basic economics and the business cycle means that we will have a contraction (possibly recession) phase, regardless of which party is in power, it's just the depth of the trough that will vary. So a recession is the least of my worries. In fact it was Hawke and Keating that carried out some of the best reforms. The recession "we had to have" was in a period when we didn't know the Reserve Banks objective, at least now we know they target inflation at 2% - 3%. The Current Account Defecit now runs at 95% private. All this thanks to Labor floating the dollar and removing some of the foreign finance barriers. This means we now have foreign investment rather than an increase in foreign ownership, so some of the economic management arguments are a bit of a joke.
This is why I look at other issues such as unions, environment, etc., in a lot more detail and to me returning to the bad old days of unions is not good. Having to pay people out for unfair dismissal when they wouldn't work in an iron lung or keeping them on the books, what a choice. Either option cost business money and keeps someone else more deserving out of a job. Also causes business to think twice before hiring people and then we start the downward spiral.
That's my 2c (or is that 4c :screwy
Under the current legislation, it isn't just unfair dismissal laws. There isn't any provision, well, there isn't any, for businesses to pay out earned entitlements if they decide to kick up a stink. I don't see why theft should be dealt with any differently when it comes to business.Having to pay people out for unfair dismissal when they wouldn't work in an iron lung or keeping them on the books, what a choice. Either option cost business money and keeps someone else more deserving out of a job. Also causes business to think twice before hiring people and then we start the downward spiral.
Between Kyoto and sorry to the aboriginals... just the start of setting labor up for a 2010 landslide back to the Libs.Its Interesting to note that Liberals most likely successor Turnbull now supports ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and abandonment of the Coalition's hardline industrial relations (IR) scheme.
SO wouldnt really matter who ran the country, their policys now seem identicle!
It will be good to see the end of the neo-con influence in Oz.Its Interesting to note that Liberals most likely successor Turnbull now supports ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and abandonment of the Coalition's hardline industrial relations (IR) scheme.
SO wouldnt really matter who ran the country, their policys now seem identicle!
Chance of Recession is 100% but what is has more of a chance with labour in (more than 100%) is that inflation will be starting to make its long road upwards. Wages will increase !!! But along with that interest rates too will rise in a big way. Australians are already maxed out. What is going to happen when people start loosing their houses? Probably the same as what is happening to the US now. Hopefully if wages rise this might be enough to counter the effects of interest rate rises. History says if the US sneazes we catch a cold. Has the world changed so much for us not to listen to the past?
Kyoto was a very popular move. We are meeting the targets anyway...Between Kyoto
Chops, yes but for how long?
Have you seen what it has done to NZ? I read somewhere that it will cost them anywhere from $500mil to $1bil (they're not sure yet) in what is essentialy a fine for not meeting it.
I'd rather not sign it and say we met it anyway then sign it and risk huge loses.
This is why I think the libs will agree with labor, they are setting them up! After all Rudd is now in power so at the end of the day its almost totaly up to him.
I'm not saying that Turnbul dosn't agree with kyoto but in oposition (as you have most definitely seen from Labor) you can afford to hedge your bets!!!! and easily get away with it when the next election comes around.
Just my opinionyou dont have to agree
Cheers
fair enough.... might end up buying some Grenearth shares after all, hedge my betsi.e. green power, and good corporate citizenship, without having to force anything.
fair enough.... might end up buying some Grenearth shares after all, hedge my bets
Its Interesting to note that Liberals most likely successor Turnbull now supports ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and abandonment of the Coalition's hardline industrial relations (IR) scheme.
SO wouldnt really matter who ran the country, their policys now seem identicle!
It's easy to meet the targets, and keep inflation down, by switching the economy from manufacturing (which uses a lot of energy) to simply digging things up and selling them (which uses far less energy).Chops, yes but for how long?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?