And there we go, more under promising and overdelivering.
PDL purchases revised up significantly.
Will these PDL purchases be as profitable as previous?
Has the market come back to CCP's purchasing criteria or has CCP met the market to increase purchases?
ps
I don't know the answer.
awesome result, these guys are the best of the best, year on year grow, year on year dividend increase and the consumer lending generating profit much faster than I anticipate very very happy
the secret ingredients is paying off in other areas
It gives an insight of what the true profit of the lending division is when it's not being impacted by the upfront provision.
Compared to their peers, CCV, TGA, who are recognising loses on an incurred instead of expected basis, their profit is understated.
They both provision. I'm pretty sure the AASB would require provisioning as part of the estimation of future cash flows.
CCP have early adopted AASB 9 which changes the provisioning model from an incurred lost to an expected loss model. The all have provisions, CCP just recognises provisions for losses sooner, hence understating profits when there are a lot of new loans.
Steady as she goes with the latest update..
and I like page 12 (Not a payday lender), I got out of CCV sometimes ago for being a pay day lender and I wouldn't want CCP to go down that path
Business or ethics?
Any thoughts?
That's a big call.Given that there is nothing in the public arena to cause such a large drop relative to the market, it looks like simple old insider trading. Someone knows something and is acting, all too common in our market. Regulators to weak to do anything about it. Cest la vie!
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.