Yup. And their CFO and CEO, as well as the ASX were made aware of the position on 1/9/09 and were invited to make an announcement to the market. They have chosen not to.
The folks and IMF & Clime no doubt base their claim on whether announcements to the market were made on time, if at all. It's all a bit deja vu.
Isnt this good enough disclosure in their report??? You trying to go on a personal mission to attack CCP without much credible new information...
all those information are in the market for the past 2 years....people know it's
there..it's exist..it's factor into the price....it's a free market.....
Any how the higher the price rise the worse it get for Clime law suitso
someone is trying to keep the price low...and the technical chart is a mighty bright for this stock
that will draw traders in ..stock goes back to the old day..law suit throw out..you havent lost any money you just make stupid decision and sell at a loss, live and learn in free market
On 23 December 2008 the Company advised that it had received a Statement of Claim (‘Statement’) from Clime Capital
Limited as the representative party for a group which has entered into litigation funding agreements with IMF (Australia)
Limited. The Statement contains allegations that from 7 November 2007 to 11 February 2008 the Company engaged in
misleading conduct by making certain representations for which it had no reasonable basis and breached its continuous
disclosure obligations in relation to certain matters regarding its profitability.
The Company maintains insurance that addresses this type of claim. Notwithstanding the existence of this insurance,
the Company is not insulated from all costs and damages which may arise from the claim. The directors have recorded
an accrual for shareholder litigation defence costs in the FY2009 accounts. No provision has been made for any potential award of damages against the Company.
This is just a thought, but looking at the dates that CCP was apparently unlicenced - May 2006 to July 2009 - could it be possible that the recently sold Wise McGrath could have had the licence during that time? And therefore, it would appear that there was no licence given directly to CCP? I know that was almost exactly the same period of time that CCP owned WM
Who cares about the Clime lawsuit? That's obviously a nuisance suit.
I'm more concerned about the licensing issue and what effect could this have on revenue already received. How much of that revenue could be claimed back by a payor since it might not have been legally collected? That is the issue I want to see addressed by a press release. Clime's suit is non-news.
Is there any news for CreditCorp associated with today's share price rise? I didn't see any ASX release.
Is there any news for CreditCorp associated with today's share price rise? I didn't see any ASX release.
CCP has had a good breakout recently to close at $2.26 today. The sellers have almost completely disappeared. Is it possible to get a copy of the AFR article online?
Here is the first half of the article, If I have time I scan for you..
"Page 32 of AFR Wednesday 30th September 2009
Title: Efficiency Pays off for Debt Buyer
Australia's largest debt buyer, Credit Corp is liked by analyst for its strong operational discipline,
so much so that they argue that the stock is undervalue despite a recent rally.
The company buys overdue personal loan and credit card debt from lenders and collect these, profiting
the difference in price.
At its results in August management said it would buy more debt ledgers after extending
its 120 million coporate debt facility until mid 2012.
Debt collector fare best in a stable economic condition, when house hold debts are high
but unemployment is not an issue.
while many companies cut dividend this reporting season
Credit Corp maintained its final dividend at 2 cents after it lift ned underlying profit by 30 percent
to $10.7 million for the year to June 30.
The solid performance was attributed to more efficient debt collection methods and the company gave profit guidance of $11 million to $13 million for coming year. It forecast earning per share of 25 to 29 cents plus a dividend of 5 to 6 cents per share."
What is the best source to find out the total holdings of each major institutional holder?
That article sounds low on analysis and heavy on ramping. They don't even identify the analyst by name, or make any attempt to summarize the consensus rating or estimates.
And it looks like it worked!
They do if you spend $3 and buy the paper and read the whole article instead of half article..
They not only name 1 but 3 names from three different firms
If you care enough you can source the information you need
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?