Faramir
Very New Investor
- Joined
- 24 March 2014
- Posts
- 680
- Reactions
- 759
It’s actually a very fair decision.Commonwealth Bank pauses plans to charge customers $3 fee to withdraw cash
Australia's biggest bank has paused its plans to charge customers a $3 fee to withdraw their own money at bank branches around the country, a day after it was announced.www.abc.net.au
Just a “pause” for now. Maybe someone is asking are the social licence costs worth it? Regardless of what anyone thinks of cash, there are plenty people willing to fight this decision for their reasons.
They make millions out of your money when it's in the transaction limbo, I used to know a banker in the 90s who would do things like put it on the money market over the weekend.It’s actually a very fair decision.
Eg reducing the monthly account fees but introducing a cash handling fee, it means the people that don’t use cash pay less than before, and the heavy users of cash will pay a bit more for the services they use, because they won’t be subsidised by the non cash users as much.
Yes, but at call funds, that are withdrawn every pay day are not very useful to the banks.They make millions out of your money when it's in the transaction limbo, I used to know a banker in the 90s who would do things like put it on the money market over the weekend.
Why 90% of the customers were going to be paying less, when you factor in the lowering of the monthly bank fees. Only the heavy users of the ATMs will end up paying more once you add in the $3 withdrawal fees, which seems fair enough to me.I say "bank run on Commonwealth Bank".
Take your cash and run.
Close your account.
Hi hun. Stupid auto correct... was supposed to be ho hum!
who? name please? Did he keep the margin for himself? otherwise, so what!They make millions out of your money when it's in the transaction limbo, I used to know a banker in the 90s who would do things like put it on the money market over the weekend.
It was for a major bank that he managed. I don't think he would have kept the profits for himself, I'd guess he would have been on some type of commission but never asked. We were talking about the time it takes to transfer money into accounts and where it goes, and he boasted about making a phenomenal figure for back then. If you have millions of dollars in transaction limbo at any one time, it would make sense to invest it.who? name please? Did he keep the margin for himself? otherwise, so what!
was better In the 1970s .. bank a cheque at 4.50pm* on a Friday, get it cleared on a Mondsy, earn 2x interest for the weekend. (not clearedctill Mon, but credited as depsit on Fri.) ..Long weekends were even better, and interest rates were high !!
* note , banks closed at 4pm Mo-Th, but opened an extra hour on Fri.
Yes, if you do enough business with the bank you might get offered an account type with no fees, or if you have a home loan often free bank accounts are offered as part of the package, obviously paid for with the profits of the home loan.Many people aren't paying account keeping fees at the moment.
But, if you don’t really do much at the bank accept having an at call bank accounts you probably have a monthly fee.
That depends which ones you are talking about, they all have different pros and cons, and expectations of your actions etc. often they have limits to using ATMs, and will charge a fee if you use ATM’s at all or above a set limit.Really? I think every high interest at call savings account has no monthly fees these days. Competition is a great thing.
Account keeping fees are a wrought and should not exist. Even for transaction accounts which pay no interest which means the bank is borrowing your money for free and yet sometimes they still charge an account keeping fee. So you pay for the privilege of lending your money for free to the bank. It makes sense to charge a fee if the banks were a storage vault like back in the old days hundreds of years ago but they are not storing your money they are lending it out which means if everyone demanded their deposits back at the same time the banks would not be able to pay out the money yet to rub salt into the wound they charge an account keeping fee.It’s actually a very fair decision.
Eg reducing the monthly account fees but introducing a cash handling fee, it means the people that don’t use cash pay less than before, and the heavy users of cash will pay a bit more for the services they use, because they won’t be subsidised by the non cash users as much.
I could not care less about banking fee for manual transaction etc, but hate the control banks have on our own access.Account keeping fees are a wrought and should not exist. Even for transaction accounts which pay no interest which means the bank is borrowing your money for free and yet sometimes they still charge an account keeping fee. So you pay for the privilege of lending your money for free to the bank. It makes sense to charge a fee if the banks were a storage vault like back in the old days hundreds of years ago but they are not storing your money they are lending it out which means if everyone demanded their deposits back at the same time the banks would not be able to pay out the money yet to rub salt into the wound they charge an account keeping fee.
Anyway these dumb banks don't get the bigger picture. Everybody hates banks and just like Blockbuster in the 1990s with their hated late fees they will soon be disrupted. Within 20 years crypto companies will overtake banks.
Banks have so many rules and regulations about what you can do with your own money admittedly a lot of it coming from regulators but some of it is their own rules. Who wants to deal with all that nonsense when you can send $1 billion dollars of USDT or Bitcoin to the other side of the world including sanctioned countries like Iran or Venezuela in 10 minutes for a few dollars. Furthermore the government cannot shutdown peoples Bitcoin wallets the way Justin Trudeau shut down peoples bank accounts during the scam-demic when they protested against his dictatorship (COVID was the biggest scam of all time).
The modern banking system is a scam with its fractional reserve banking model, high fees, high regulations, etc. Society will be a lt more productive when the crypto eco-system eventually replaces the banks.
There are many ways to get accounts with out fees. But some people literally do no business with the bank except get money deposited and then withdraw it straight away, they cost the bank a lot of money.Account keeping fees are a wrought and should not exist. Even for transaction accounts which pay no interest which means the bank is borrowing your money for free and yet sometimes they still charge an account keeping fee. So you pay for the privilege of lending your money for free to the bank. It makes sense to charge a fee if the banks were a storage vault like back in the old days hundreds of years ago but they are not storing your money they are lending it out which means if everyone demanded their deposits back at the same time the banks would not be able to pay out the money yet to rub salt into the wound they charge an account keeping fee.
Anyway these dumb banks don't get the bigger picture. Everybody hates banks and just like Blockbuster in the 1990s with their hated late fees they will soon be disrupted. Within 20 years crypto companies will overtake banks.
Banks have so many rules and regulations about what you can do with your own money admittedly a lot of it coming from regulators but some of it is their own rules. Who wants to deal with all that nonsense when you can send $1 billion dollars of USDT or Bitcoin to the other side of the world including sanctioned countries like Iran or Venezuela in 10 minutes for a few dollars. Furthermore the government cannot shutdown peoples Bitcoin wallets the way Justin Trudeau shut down peoples bank accounts during the scam-demic when they protested against his dictatorship (COVID was the biggest scam of all time).
The modern banking system is a scam with its fractional reserve banking model, high fees, high regulations, etc. Society will be a lt more productive when the crypto eco-system eventually replaces the banks.
You can access your money pretty much world wide, that’s pretty good access,I could not care less about banking fee for manual transaction etc, but hate the control banks have on our own access.
Only a small but growing percentage of users actually realise how hard it is to access your own money, especially with CBA for me....
Not even talking Bitcoin or cash, just moving money toward other aussies accounts, god forbid me if overseas
The more this realisation spreads, the less the trust in the banks, and the current banking system is a house of cards fully and only built on trust...
There are a lot of hoops to jump through.You can access your money pretty much world wide, that’s pretty good access,
Straw man argument. The number of people doing this is negligible.There are many ways to get accounts with out fees. But some people literally do no business with the bank except get money deposited and then withdraw it straight away, they cost the bank a lot of money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?