The golden trifecta.A smoker, having a beer, playing the pokies has to be the tax man’s wet dream hahaha.
The golden trifecta.A smoker, having a beer, playing the pokies has to be the tax man’s wet dream hahaha.
Doesn‘t the block chain Basically leave a permanent public record of all the transactions that can be traced?
also, because the actually Bitcoin block chain can only process such as small number of transactions each minute, and authentication can take up to 12 minutes, when it comes to daily transactions You are going to have to have a similar setup up to the current credit card system, where a bank or Institution holds the crypto in a “vault” and the transactions are all just processed off the actual block chains, so it will be no different to they was credit cards work now, it’s just the settlement will be in crypto instead of Australian dollars.
you can’t really go down to 7/11 and buy some Krispy Kreme donuts with gold bullion though.Yes, there is a public record of transactions but it's more opaque than an Australian bank account and transactions that are not the subject of an investigation would be reasonably anonymous. It gets more anonymous the less you use the more prominent cryptocurrencies. There are ways and means to get more and more anonymous for most purposes.
Gold and silver bullion is as anonymous as it gets. You will need some cash to obtain it but once you own it it’s very difficult for anyone to know what you have done with it.
around the area i used to reside i note more than half the shops have erected bollards to stop/slow ram-raiders , including shops i am surprised that have been targeted ( some repeatedlyWhat I mean is that shop owners charge people paying cash a 1% fee to cover the costs of armed guards and other cash handling costs, just like they charge credit card users.
They are, and they tend to have a limited impact pension cost wise.......A smoker, having a beer, playing the pokies has to be the tax man’s wet dream hahaha.
*missed CREDIT in your entry.I’m staying in a remote Tasmanian resort, they charge a surcharge for cards but not for cash.
Why is that?
It’s because the banks profit comes from *card transactions. All the talk adding a surcharge is a way to put fear into users and sway them to cards.
.
View attachment 173861
*missed CREDIT in your entry.
I don't agree, I think cashless is a net plus to consumers, thats why more than ever consumers are going cashless, it is also a cheaper system over all to run. Cash is a clunky expensive, and labour intensive system when you really look at it, its like block buster video compared to Netflix.A Cashless Society creates a greater disadvantage to an already struggling working class, it allows greater profits for banks and an ability for all business to cause an untethered upward pressure on prices (discrimination already exists in disadvantaged suburbs try finding an ATM that is not privately owned ergo costs of withdrawals arise, borrowing becomes near impossible due to automation of application where data is scraped from statements with no face to face explanation or an ability to appeal for customers exists.
Furthermore in cases a cashless society can be a gamification of money (imagine poker machine player tapping away giving no value to money). It also simplifies Cyber fraud both local and international, cyber terrorist attacks by anti democratic adversaries. I suspect much like the GST a cashless society is meant to control the flow of Income for Tax purposes in society and as we know the PAYG employee has been doing their part whilst others find avenues to circumvent the system and will do so in a cashless society.
Perhaps it is time for government to invest in changes to the Tax Act rather than taking away part of the identity of a nation that being its cash.
Actually NO at some businesses ALL EFTPOS transactions incur a fee, to top it off more often than not the nearby ATM is not working (personal experience), not because of being a tighty but rather for FSake it is my money why charge a fee given that you give me little interest (costs what costs no branches, long queues and almost completely automated,) while the bank makes margin. It is not only banks most businesses in retail or services are making greater profit margins than before Covid.*missed CREDIT in your entry.
Don't be mad at the bank for the card fee, be mad at the shop, they are the one passing along a cost to you that they should just really be absorbing, since they absorb the cash handling costs when you spend cash.Actually NO at some businesses ALL EFTPOS transactions incur a fee, to top it off more often than not the nearby ATM is not working (personal experience), not because of being a tighty but rather for FSake it is my money why charge a fee given that you give me little interest (costs what costs no branches, long queues and almost completely automated,) while the bank makes margin. It is not only banks most businesses in retail or services are making greater profit margins than before Covid.
Unfortunately consumer apathy continues to allow the unreasonable, unrestrained growth of business margins, while we have a personal positive income/expense sheet it's all good fun until, uh oh....
I’m not mad at banks at all but rather attempting to point out the APATHY that exists increasingly in our society by consumers and that we seem to be showing little regard to the impact of what may seem to many as minor (won’t effect me) business actions including that of going cashless.Don't be mad at the bank for the card fee, be mad at the shop, they are the one passing along a cost to you that they should just really be absorbing, since they absorb the cash handling costs when you spend cash.
Whether you make your payment with cash or card, the business incurs some cash handling costs, but they generally only pass on the card costs, because they see them on their statement, where as some of the cash handling costs are more hidden from them eg their time of doing bank runs, getting change etc etc
So if the card costs being passed along makes you mad, be mad at the business and wonder why they let the cash users spend cash for free but not your card transaction, Most big businesses don't pass on card fees because they know its cheaper for them than paying armed guards etc, its only the small unsophisticated business owners that pass along the charges, because they don't value their time correctly or want cash because they want to dodge tax.
I don’t think going cashless is caused by consumer apathy, I think most consumers love it and prefer it. I certainly prefer cashless transactions.I’m not mad at banks at all but rather attempting to point out the APATHY that exists increasingly in our society by consumers and that we seem to be showing little regard to the impact of what may seem to many as minor (won’t effect me) business actions including that of going cashless.
In my work experience I see unfair decisions/changes that may cause hardship being placed upon certain suburbs and demographics. I agree EFTPOS fees ought be and in my business experience have always been added to the calculation of costs prior to assessing a Selling Price, seems retailers ought be calling it the sucker fee.
It seems to me greed has taken control of retail sales these days, many of us can point to outrageous cost blowouts that defy logic including price increases at the large grocery chains counter, their margins grow as they suggest to us petty theft is on the rise in their stores (they increase costs, margins and profit under the pretext they are being robbed…lol) nonetheless we carry on by affirming to our own suspicions “it’s only $3“ however for many $3 can be a godsend. My point is be aware of our own apathy and perhaps add a little empathy into your wealth growing day. (Probably not the place for this spiel… done now… )
was replying to John D, concerning the specific circumstances; he postedActually NO at some businesses ALL EFTPOS transactions incur a fee, to top it off more often than not the nearby ATM is not working (personal experience), not because of being a tighty but rather for FSake it ....
I don't agree, I think cashless is a net plus to consumers, thats why more than ever consumers are going cashless, it is also a cheaper system over all to run. Cash is a clunky expensive, and labour intensive system when you really look at it, its like block buster video compared to Netflix.
And what is wrong with banks making more money if they are offering consumers a better product, and most of the working class own the banks in their super funds any way.
I was at Service NSW to renew my Driver’s License, I decided to pay my fee by way of Eftpos using my debit card (not a credit card, my wife likes me to use it for the loyalty points, another inflationary transaction but I digress she who must be obeyed always wins ), I asked the gentleman at the counter if there was a fee attributable to the transaction he said yes (btw I always carry cash, I like it and no I don’t have a cash business for tax evasion purposes ) I explained it was my debit card not Credit, he said if I tapped their would be a fee however if I inserted my card into the eftpos machine and proceeded to enter the amount, transaction type and password there would be no fee.was replying to John D, concerning the specific circumstances; he posted
View attachment 173891
which to my understanding states that EFTPOS does not attract fees.
Apricity Finance boss Linden Toll arrested on fraud charges
Linden Toll, the managing director of Apricity Finance which collapsed a year ago with debts of more than $50m, has been charged with several criminal offences relating to an “alleged multimillion-dollar fraud’’.
New South Wales Police last week extradited Mr Toll, 55, from Queensland, having been granted an arrest warrant on March 13.
“Detectives attached to The Hume Police District initiated an investigation into the alleged multimillion-dollar fraud relating to loans and investment companies in the Southern Highlands between 2013 and 2023,’’ NSW Police said in a statement.
Mr Toll was last week charged with three counts of publishing fake or misleading material to obtain an advantage, three counts of an officer publishing a false or misleading statement to deceive, dishonestly obtaining financial advantage by deception and knowingly dealing with the proceeds of crime.
you can’t really go down to 7/11 and buy some Krispy Kreme donuts with gold bullion though.
Did you understand what I said about crypto not being good for actual real time transactions, and there still being a need to have clearing houses similar to visa/Mastercard and the banks to process the transactions?
for example bitcoin can not handle the large amount of transactions that happen every day, so if you wanted to have Bitcoin as the currency for all transactions, you would have to have basically the equivalent of bank accounts and credit cards dealing with all the transactions, and these institutions just settle in Bitcoin, so all the records of the transactions you made would exist in exactly the same way as they do with regular credit cards now.
Well, you do you I guess .I don't care if the bank is aware of day to day transactions at supermarkets, cafes, paying bills, ordinary things like that. But I want the option to engage in consensual momentary transactions with other private citizens that companies or the government are not aware of. I want to retain this right because I do not trust the government or banks. Everything I do is not the business of the government or any company, public or private. These entities are not my family or my friends and I do not want them to know any more about me, or my life, than is absolutely necessary.
If I was to use crypto, I would not use Bitcoin, nor would I use an Australian based crypto broker. I would do my research and transact in such a way as to not be traceable by any Australian-based entity, private or governmental. i accept that any transactions that may be subject to a police investigation could be traced and would not be anonymous. However, it is not my intention to act illegally. All I want to retain is my privacy.
It is worth pointing out that during the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the rights we take for granted were suspended by the government and we essentially became a police state for a period of time. It is clear to me that this could happen again as we have no constitutional protection from the government or the police that can't be dispensed with by the courts. Authoritarianism is only ever one day away. If we take only one thing away from the COVID-19 experience that should be it.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.