This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Cashless society

and maybe that 1% will be perfect , especially with the agenda to stop selling fossil fuels of course for farm use maybe converting the ute to a wood-burner( steam ) might work but initially could be cost inefficient ( plenty of dead wood around once converted ) and two horses can be self-replacing over a few years ( no more reliance on Toyota or Ford for parts )
 
Yeah, a cashless society will save consumers money

“Merchant acquirers – banks – are gouging merchants who are then passing costs on to consumers,”
Banks were also enjoying hefty profits due to the gap between the wholesale amount charged for eftpos transactions, which Mr Kelly said made up about 75 per cent of card purchases, and the fees they charge merchants.

 
Have noticed a few signs appearing in shop fronts re cashless society.
This one was in our local bakery.
Happy to accomodate them this morning.
i thought most of the merchant fees were attached by the intermediary providers like Tyro, Square and other hustlers. Some optionsl, some mandated.

But hey, love a good Big Bank Bash.
 
i thought most of the merchant fees were attached by the intermediary providers like Tyro, Square and other hustlers. Some optionsl, some mandated.

But hey, love a good Big Bank Bash.

The widespread transaction fee ripoffs have led Reserve Bank governor Michelle Bullock to warn the payments industry that regulation is on the way to force it to cut processing costs and pass on savings.

To reduce processing costs, Ms Bullock wants industry to adopt what’s called “least cost routing”, or LCR, where transactions are automatically allocated to the cheapest processing method possible. Mr Kelly said LCR was currently used by 54 per cent of merchants.
 
sounds effective ( not ! )

if the majority are already using the system Ms. Bullock is lining up for another hit to the reputation
I'm not too sure about lower transaction costs on credit cards. Ours which is used only for business usualy gets hit with somewhere between 1.5 and 2.5 per cent of the value purchased, when it only would cost the bank/merchant a few cents to transact.
 
Merchant fees vary, but the basically the system costs of processing your transactions are Covered by merchant fees include.

1. your card issuer earns a fee (eg cba, westpac, Nab etc)

2. the terminal provider earns a fee (which ever bank operates the terminal)

3. The processor earns a fee (Mastercard, Visa, American Express etc)

4. Awards points rebated back to the card user have a cost.

5. cost of capital between the when the sale happens and when you pay your bill.

—————————
Even if you pay a 2.5% there is a chance you can recover most of that value back.

for example if I spent $1000, even at the highest fee of 2.5% I would only be charged $25.

but the points I earn are worth $23.40 when I convert them to my frequent flyer account.

+

having that $1000 sit on my home loan account for an extra 40 days until my credit card payment is due saves me $6.40 in interest so that $25 fee brings me $29.80 in value.

and all the times I purchase with out having a fee added is just free money.
 
I am assuming the fee would include buyer protection as there would be a cost to building that in. I have received a text asking me to verify a purchase. They were valid purchases I made. Hasn't happened often though. I use Visa branded debit cards.

 
@JohnDe is it Me Bank?

From the Me Bank website:


Eventually , I received a SMS about an hour ago about the ongoing "technical issue".

Being sorry for the inconvenience and for letting the customer down isn't much help now is it?
 
does crime translate to any financial activity not done by government ??

because that is the interpretation i am seeing

and since when is hoarding a crime ? ( when the government is ultra desperate to waste YOUR money )

remember hoarders are a natural restraint on inflation ( i call in 'forward buying', but tomatoes/tomatoes )

nice to see the AFR discretely bash their consumers ( i love the reasons they create to deter me from buying their out-pourings)

by the way Fairfax thanks for divesting TradeMe ( TME when it was ASX listed ) is was clearly the best part of your dog's breakfast
 
Mr frog 'tis well known those that travel outside of the law have and deal in cash.
The odd few I have dealth with over the years always have a suitcase of the stuff.
well you can't count on the banks to keep it safe ( or to keep it hidden from the government prying eyes )

besides now they have 'currency sniffer ' dogs at transit terminals it is slightly more difficult to transact internationally
 
well you can't count on the banks to keep it safe ( or to keep it hidden from the government prying eyes )

besides now they have 'currency sniffer ' dogs at transit terminals it is slightly more difficult to transact internationally
Just been talking to a cousin in the north-east wheatbelt, a Neighbour of his wanted to with draw cash from the local bank. Was told go to the Post Office. Apparrently this is the norm. Or the alternative is a round trip of about 150k to Moora.
 
Just been talking to a cousin in the north-east wheatbelt, a Neighbour of his wanted to with draw cash from the local bank. Was told go to the Post Office. Apparrently this is the norm. Or the alternative is a round trip of about 150k to Moora.
i don't know if your Post Office is a franchise ( or not ) ( the nearest one is here )

but that smells like a soft default to me ( after all a 'bank' is supposed to have 'secure storage' .. and insurance against overt theft ) while a Post Office is basically protected by federal law

sounds like that bank branch is not a real bank much like a shop counter much like the average Telstra shop
 
I see a lot of businesses that have a sign that says " No Cash Kept on Premises".
Won't be long before the banks have similar signs.
mick
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...