Re: Short term discretionary trades---Real time examples
Hi Dan
Dan_ said:
............I guess I find it amusing that Tech/A has posted a trade, which was called into question by Bullmarket who wants Tech/A to verify the information contained in that particular post (which has been verified by WayneL, and honestly in my opinion Tech's integrity is more that enough) as he claims he has proof that no trades were taken at that time. Yet his proof is a txt document which could be produced from anywhere and he claims it's from comsec?
In short he wants verifiable proof to support his proof which is unverifiable as it's only a text document? ......................
Let me clarify a few of points you make above which are not true
1) If you look back at all my posts you will see I never requested tech/a to prove his trade....in my original post I pointed out that the course of sales do not support the time and price tech/a originally claimed to have bought the shares
(and that is undeniably true).....I then went on to wish him luck with his trade if in fact he did buy some shares but at no stage did I request him to prove his trade.
2) I also posted earlier that if Wayne is satisfied with the information that he has been given then that is fine by me
but from my point of view nothing at all has been verified because the information passed on to wayne has not been passed on to me as offered by tech/a.
3) You say that the course of sales I posted is not verifiable.....imo your statement is so laughable that it's not funny
I quoted Commsec as the source of the data and surely even you could muster up enough brain power to verify the data I posted, if you really wanted to, by contacting either Commsec, any major broker or the ASX itself who I know for a fact will all be able to verify the COS data I posted.
4) Tech/a offered to provide me with the name of his broker but when I took him up on the offer in an earlier post he has since backed away from the offer and so I now believe the offer was never genuine. The only info tech/a has given (voluntarily and unsolicited) me is a name which he claims is his true identity....it may or may not be for all I know.....
I have since passed the name he gave me to someone for verification and they have emailed me back that name's address. This morning I have emailed those details to someone else who will be able to verify tech/a's alleged trade for me since tech/a insisted earlier that it be verified for me, but then backed off by not supplying me his personal details
I hope this clears things up for you
cheers
bullmarket