I actually like dollar cost averaging. So if this is a preferred strategy, then yes, 2% is low and you can do much better. Here are some examples:
So you would go here: https://etfdb.com/
As an example I have selected:
View attachment 120124View attachment 120125View attachment 120126
Now reading the blurb, we see that this is an actively managed fund. Might be good, might be not so good down the road. A risk to evaluate. The dividend at 12% is attractive. In part it is attractive because 'Preferred' stock and 'Convertibles' sit higher in the capital structure than equity. This (in theory) should fluctuate less than equity. From a DCA point of view, this might not be as attractive, as you may want greater range in the fluctuations. It may be more attractive. Individual choice.
Then you can explore here:
FINVIZ.com - Stock Screener
Stock screener for investors and traders, financial visualizations.finviz.com
View attachment 120127View attachment 120128View attachment 120129View attachment 120130
So the 2 examples that I picked are simply random from the generated search. Both resources are free. Both will provide you with plenty of possible candidates.
In short, yes you can do far better than 2%, while maintaining many of the qualities that were attractive in your original choice.
jog on
duc
Just one point Mr Ducati @ducati916 , BTC can easily be divided.So as we reach the end of the trading week:
PPI inflation comes in higher than expected.
View attachment 120357
Which has triggered a surge in the 10yr to offset rising commodity prices and a weak dollar.
View attachment 120358
VIX higher:
View attachment 120360
And likely (next week) to continue higher. We are closer to the start than the finish.
Energy and Financials did ok. Everything else, meh.
View attachment 120359
Mr flippe-floppe-flye:
View attachment 120361
So the only thing that has really caught the attention of the speculators: is BTC.
Central Bank digital currencies are coming and probably a lot sooner than thought. That is now a given. They will be no different to fiat, except that the CB can track you that much more easily. So whether they come sooner or later, the ultimate difference is slight to nil as far as the desirability of holding BTC or gold/silver.
The issue is that only 1 crypto can emerge as a money. Probably BTC, all the others are irrelevant. Simply because otherwise you simply replicate the fiat issue.
Investing:
Then you have all the issues re. internet: hacking, DOS attacks, etc. Just how safe is it really. N. Korea was in the news again, hackers stealing $1.9B in BTC, so very definitely not inviolable.
Divisibility is an issue. What good is a coin worth $50K or $100K etc? It cannot be used as money easily.
Acceptability is a further issue. For BTC to become money, it will have to universally acceptable as such. Putting aside government taxes, acceptable by sellers of goods and services. You need a doctor, does he accept BTC? You want to buy a property, does the vendor accept BTC?
Doesn't its ultimate value reside in BTC becoming a de facto money? If it doesn't or can't, what is its ultimate value?
Trading:
It has just breached its long term resistance. This is very far from a confirmation. Many initial BO are invalidated. Almost invariably (by definition) we will have a test of that BO point. BTC has also drifted far from its 50EMA. On its first run up, it also got far ahead of itself and came back. My money would be on the same again.
Ultimately, it will have to pass the test of history. There will be something that tests its limits. If it breaks, it was an interesting experiment. If it passes, it passes and will continue as an additional financial asset.
View attachment 120362
jog on
duc
Just clarifying what kind of serious you're referring to?THE CORRECTION JUST BECAME MORE SERIOUS: TIME TO FULLY HEDGE OR EXIT
Just clarifying what kind of serious you're referring to?
Serious as in you're thinking the major stock indices drop modestly, say 10%, then it's on with the bull?
Or serious as in the bull's over, here comes a test of the lows from 2020 kind of serious?
Just not sure how to interpret your comment really....
Mr Ducati,
What is your view on the USD vs AUD/NZD?
For year i have successfully edged my ASX shares focussed system with USD exposure and PM
Roughly: ASX down , USD up.
And overall wealth ok
Last 2 weeks ,even before last night has been a disaster with USD crashing coupled with both mistakes and "bad luck". So a shxxy week from finance to just life.Sxxt happens, but got it in truckload in the last 10 days...
I winged about it in my journal....
More seriously, in the current context, i am really puzzled by the currency play
AUD was 58c at the end of March 2020 and 80c yesterday
That is a 37% increase in less than a year...
Noone seems to really notice.not in the news or yahoo finance..all about Zoom and Tesla
US market did well in the past year hardly break even with USD fall
Hopefully it will revert if we have a crash as people flee to so called USD safety, but not a given with the abysmal US deficit.
What is your take?
As a note
I always see wealth not within a country context but in a world context.
And by default so far, this means USD
So RE+shares+cash+PM(+BTC?) in USD
Hope this is still relevant to your thread.if not ask me and i will delete
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?