- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,306
- Reactions
- 19,674
We knew it was a short-time play, but I guess you have to understand that not everyone knows what exactly that means. I think even amateur savvy invsetors would have been in and out. hate to see people lose large sums of money though!I understand (a bit) jumping on the wagon but at the very least be realistic and once it started plunging, it was really a case of get the Fxx out ASAP.you could hang onto Afterpay or even Tesla after a crash, but that was really a play against the short so with an expiring date even if it worked..which it did in a way, then the funds got the final laugh on the late (re) tarded suckers jumping onto what was just a wagon to oblivion
Not sure if we should laugh or cry.The enthousiasm and stupidity of youth I think
View attachment 119757
Not a good sign for the so called background in finance, am I the only one to have a smile when my eye caught this?
mine?would like to see your current holdings
Yes and ducati'smine?
Yes and ducati's
And as discussed elsewhere: hard to do on asx only bboz and bear are short available ETFs here..so definitively a US playEssentially any ETF that has both a long and short component. Those that have leverage x3/x2 are preferred to those that are simply x1. The reason is that I play a market neutral game.
jog on
duc
Great analysis as always but i found these charts style just unreadable. :-(The bull market remains in place:
All of the below, should turn upwards in a bear market.
View attachment 120024
Europe looking to break out.
View attachment 120025
As are Emerging markets:
View attachment 120026
Most importantly for the US, Financials are moving (although this is a very select sort of financial). The reason financials are doing well is due to the steepness of the yield curve. It has to be said that European financials are f***ed, an absolute cesspit. US financials require some caution also.
View attachment 120027
IPO's contain plenty of SPACS. Many of these are destined to end horribly. But not today.
View attachment 120028
Mr flippe-floppe-flye
View attachment 120029View attachment 120030
The SPY: the red box is the 'reversal' box.
View attachment 120031
BTC: Below the 20 is obviously an issue. The Blue is the 5.
View attachment 120032
Gold: the green box is the reversal box. Red is the 5, Purple is the 20. Gold looks to be finding support at the 20, but confirmation is if it passes through the reversal.
View attachment 120033
Another view: the 10yr looks bullish, which generally spells lower prices for gold. I'm (guessing) that the gold chart above, will fail and gold will fall below the 20, which previously supported it. If 'gold' moves higher, it is potentially in the gold miners as opposed to gold itself.
View attachment 120034
Overall, the bulls remain firmly in control. We are definitely in 'buy-the-dip' territory, as of course there will be dips along the way. Inflation while picking up, is not yet an issue for the market.
Scenario 1.
Inflation (will likely) continue, yields will continue to rise and at some point (somewhere between 2% & 3%) the market will falter. There could start to be defaults on debt loads. This is deflationary. For the Fed, this is a far bigger issue than inflation.
Scenario 2.
Inflation will continue, rates will rise, the Fed. will cap rates. Gold will come back in a big way, stocks will continue higher for a time and currencies will become a big market issue.
jog on
duc
Great analysis as always but i found these charts style just unreadable. :-(
It conveys souvenirs of 1980 dot matrix print out , hand written math fct graphs on log papers.
in all the due respect i genuinely have for you Mr Duc, can you get visual clues, read from these?
Is it just me?
Essentially any ETF that has both a long and short component. Those that have leverage x3/x2 are preferred to those that are simply x1. The reason is that I play a market neutral game.
jog on
duc
I am invested into VGS, international market ETF from vanguard. My goal is for early retirement, thoughts?
I have some small holdings in other companies, but majority of my position is with VGS
There are a number of variables around strategies you might employ: will you
(a) Buy and hold;
(b) Trade in/out;
(c) Hedge;
(d) Employ Options;
(e) Dollar cost average;
(f) Other.
The strategy(ies) that you employ will have significant impact on how your returns look. The market direction will impact the strategies that you employ.
(Very) generally speaking, to retire, you would need the dividend yield in nominal dollars to support your lifestyle.
View attachment 120057
At 2% you will likely need +/- $4M worth of stock to give you $80K, which is a bare minimum.
So to get to let's say $10M of stock, you'll (likely) need to accumulate additional shares, unless what you hold trades high enough to sell out and pay your tax on capital gains, to net $10M to reinvest in something else.
The above strategies can all be employed to increase your total holdings to a desired level, to then live off of dividend income.
Further questions:
(a) Do markets only go up?
(b) If not, capital gains are unlikely to provide what you seek:
Therefore, some strategies will likely need to be employed.
jog on
duc
Awesome reply thank you. I follow Dollar Cost Average approach, for the vgs etf. I'm guessing 2% dividend isn't high? Perhaps I should look at other etfs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?