DeepState
Multi-Strategy, Quant and Fundamental
- Joined
- 30 March 2014
- Posts
- 1,615
- Reactions
- 81
It's a far cry from the rhetoric per election where every dollar of deficit was like a drop of blood cruelly taken from future generations. The world was collapsing into a blackhole of Labor debt when it was just $18B. Twin blackholes for Hockey maybe?
It's a shame some meaningful reform wasn't implemented, with the associated savings churned into IA vetted infrastructure. With borrowing rates under 3% out to 15 years there's probably never going to be a better time to start building the infrastructure we need to cope with rampant population growth that both major parties support. With project providing 20%+ returns, it would seem to be a no brainer to ramp up infrastructure spending, but then that would require a backtrack on debt is bad, surplus is good rhetoric.
The cynic in me can see the small business sector rorting the 20K immediate deduction. It's due to end when the car industry shutters, so not sure if it's a good idea to draw what could be a lot of demand forward before it finishes when 60K+ of workers are out of decent paying jobs.
There's still no coherent narrative and policy on how to get the deficit on a sustainable path to balance. The forward estimates are a joke. Wages growth is at it's lowest in decades, and will continue to stagnate till we regain our international competitiveness. The budget is predicting the ToT to plateau at a rate something like a 1/4 higher than the historical average. Hockey has set himself up to be swanned every year as the ToT continues falling to overshoot the long term average before finally balancing out.
hockey is also forecasting unrealistic non mining sector investment growth. Next FY it's 4%, beating the latest ABS CAPEX forecasts which indicates oncoming falls in investment intentions. To then predict investment growth to double to 8% the year after, when the car industry is closing down and taking a lot of the component manufacturers with it, well that's a unicorn on a rainbow too far for me.
To use the above to predict unemployment will peak at 6.5%, free lolipops for all, and a unicorn as well.
Wage growth of 2.5% also seems a bit over the top when most are receiving nowhere near that. Possibly that's a prediction for minimum politician pay rises?
All up I see the deficit will have a 4 in front of it than a 3.
As always, fantastic thinking, Syd.
Questions/Observations:
A more politically neutral document. Less strong positions. A natural outcome from the acrimony of the prior year. Table thumping about a budget emergency has given way to a more realistic appraisal that we aren't exactly heading into an emergency right at the minute. Interest payments are ~5% of revenue for 15/16. However, social security payment increases are very real and must be allowed for.
Pro family. Keeps super untouched and commits to leave it that way for the term of the government. Stimulating small business to generate employment. Got stuff for the older vote: PBS increase, pension reform. Financed a lot by various savings from rorts around the place, closure of detention centers and East-West. Nice touch on Multinationals Anti-Avoidance. Add some more to national security. All of this looks politically easier. Aiming high previously has resulted in over-reach. What's next? Lowered expectations.
Private non-mining investment is wider than the matters covered in the capex survey. For one thing, that excludes private residential and a bunch of agricultural etc. RBA policy is clearly aimed at stimulating housing. Maybe there is something to that.
ToT is forecast to decline by another good chunk next year before flatlining. Hard for me to say whether that makes sense or not. Estimates on this have been wildly wrong and this has cost the budget expectations a great deal. What would iron ore need to become to drive this back to the levels you imagine? Or, alternatively, how much more expensive must imports get in a world struggling with low-flation? Is that reasonable?
International competitiveness is somewhat questionable as an issue keeping domestic wage pressure contained. Our export mix hardly has any manufacturing in it. We are supported by primary exports. That said, the Real Effective Exchange Rate rose by more than Nominal during the boom because our unit labour cost (driven primarily by mining and related) rose strongly vs RoW. Either the AUD has to fall a lot, or unit labour costs need to come down. They are coming down in mining and related. Nonetheless, most of the wages expended here are applied to non-tradeables or non-traded. International competitiveness can also be absorbed via lower profit share from companies rather than labour. Also, over the forecast period from this year, we aren't seeing any material increase in real wages at all in the assumptions. That is a reflection of weak bargaining power of labour, all in all. Consider that we have seen real wages growth in 2013/14 and (forecast) 2014/15 of 2.5% in a period of rising unemployment and increased spare capacity looking for redeployment (geez, I still hate my tradies...). The CPI in these years was knocked about by currency impact on tradeables and, more recently, oil. Still, wage inflation approximated good prices.
They aren't looking to a weaker currency as a source of magic. AUDUSD is assumed 0.77. Neither are we to anticipate a fillip from yet lower energy prices.
One thing for sure is that the budgets of recent years have been far too optimistic in their assumptions. Maybe we will see a 4-handle with a negative sign on it in the wash up.