ekman said:I had read an article by fProphets (i may be wrong as i am not a 100% sure on the name) where they said the stock was around $1.10 - this was when the sp was around 60c
I may have the wrong analyst
The very first research report was done by Carmichael on the 04/07/05 where they valued the stock at $3.00. This was made before the share split. At current prices the shares would be trading at $4.695 if the share split didnt go ahead. The share split is all history now but it does confuse some people when they look back on the price history.
The next research report was done by Fat Prophets on the 30/08/06. They recommended a buy at 67.5 cents. This was recommended after the share split. So on the old valuation they recommended a buy at $2.025
Carmichael then put out another report on the 25/09/06.
They put out a recommendation when the share price was at 1.10. This may be where your getting confused. They predicted over a 6 month period a target of $1.60. They have reached this target.
Fat prophets then put out another report on the 08/11/06 where they recommended that their members "hold" Bannerman. The shares have since hit a high of $1.795 and are trading steady above the last break through level of $1.50. They are consistantly threatening their high of 1.795 and I think its only a matter of time untill we see a $2 stock. It wont be long IMO.
Bannerman is heavily backed. Lots of support when they fall into the 1.50's. I think tomorrow we can see them back into the 1.60's sp. Results are due soon and there would be a number of investors not wanting to miss the results.