captjohn said:Chris 1983 is great at calculating out all the results ahead of time & estimating size & I, for one, hope he is right.
Hi captjohn I hope I am right also. I did take profits along the way though. I'm still left with a nice holding that is being free carried so If the calculations are right which is all based off assumptions we will have huge grins on our faces in a couple of years time. Its still very early stages right now. The next set of drilling results will be a big test especially if they are drilling into an area where they know historical drilling hasn't occured. I think the future drilling results will continue to be positive because all they are doing is re-drilling the historical area atm to determine a resource and bring it to JORC standards. The good thing what they are proving though is the depth extensions on the historic resource. Below is cut out from their recent announcement.
"Additionally the results prove that potentially economic mineralisation extends at depth below the level of the historic drilling."
Its fair to say Bannerman are in an area that is known for having these type of deposits which are at depth with the rossing deposit and they have proven the possibilites of having a resource at extensive depths from the surface with their recent results. Everythings looking sweet.