Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Bitcoin - Peer to Peer currency

Jump to new
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/21956040/tsvetnenko-launches-bitcoin-company/


Tsvetnenko launches bitcoin company
The West Australian

The West Australian March 13, 2014, 8:55 am
Share





Perth-based, Russian-born tech multi-millionaire Zhenya Tsvetnenko will make his ASX debut through a backdoor listing of his new bitcoin mining and digital currency trading company, digitalBTC.

Mr Tsvetnenko, who made his fortune through mobile premium messaging services, will take over as executive chairman of the new entity.

ASX-listed shell company Macro Energy says it has already received firm commitments for a $9.1 million capital raising to effect the transaction and expand digitalBTC's bitcoin trading and digital currency mobile applications.

Mr Tsvetnenko, who made his debut on the BRW Young Rich List in 2009 with an estimated net worth of $107 million, said bitcoin was an exciting and fast emerging currency system which he believed would dramatically change the way in which many people would make payments or financial transfers.

"As the Bitcoin system matures beyond its initial niche and begins to realise its true disruptive potential, sophisticated service firms will be increasingly required to facilitate the system," he said.

"We believe that sophisticated intermediaries such as digitalBTC can derive significant profit in supporting this emerging growth phase of Bitcoin, as it takes its place as a true worldwide currency.

"We are pleased to have reached the acquisition deal with Macro, which will give us the platform and capital to take our support of and growth with the Bitcoin system to the next level, as well as offering public market investors one of the first opportunities to participate in the potential upside inherent in Bitcoin."

Mr Tsvetnenko said the company would also be involved in other emerging digital currencies.

The new entity is being touted as the first ASX-listed company offering exposure to the Bitcoin system.

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer payment system and digital currency, with a total market capitalisation of more than $US8 billion and about 66,000 transactions occurring daily at a total trade value of $US55 million.

Across the major US Bitcoin exchanges, in excess of $US20 million is regularly traded every 24 hours with more than 44,000 merchants accepting Bitcoin around the world.

However the online currency is considered a shadowy development in the online world by critics for its regular use in the trade of illegal goods such as drugs and weapons.

Governments are yet to fully grapple with how bitcoin trades can be controlled and monitored and regulations surrounding its use are still a long way off.

Last month, Japan-based bitcoin trading company Mt Gox collapsed, announcing about 850,000 bitcoins (worth about $450 million) belonging to customers and the company were missing and likely stolen.

However Macro Energy managing director Brett Lawrence said digitalBTC offered existing Macro shareholders significant potential upside in a fast growing and revolutionary sector.

Macro will change its name to DigitalCC Limited and conduct a share consolidation as part of the deal, subject to shareholder approval.

Following completion of the transaction, the new entity will have an implied pro-forma market capitalisation of $33.2 million, with approximately $12.4 million in cash on-hand and an enterprise value of $20.8 million.

Macro Energy shares were up 1.4 cents, or 54 per cent, to four cents at 8.50am.
Share
 
Im looking at purchasing some bit coins for a bit of fun..

Anyone know where I can buy some from that I wont get ripped off from?
 
matty77 said:
Im looking at purchasing some bit coins for a bit of fun..

Anyone know where I can buy some from that I wont get ripped off from?
Click to expand...


I use this lot

https://www.btradeaustralia.com/


Professor Susan Athey: ‘If People Use It, Bitcoin Has Intrinsic Value’
Carrie Kirby (@carriekirby) | Published on April 1, 2014 at 18:29 BST | Analysis, Bitcoin protocol, Blockchain, Exchanges, Investors, Merchants, News, Regulation, Startups, Wallets
inShare8
Share
23
Susan Athey

Susan Athey is a senior fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economics Policy Research, specializing in auction-based marketplaces and the economics of the Internet. She is also an advisor at Ripple Labs and serves as Microsoft’s Chief Economist.

Athey brought an independent academic perspective to discussions at CoinSummit San Francisco last week, using her expertise and research to assess the technology’s potential on many fronts.

CoinDesk spoke to Athey about what gives bitcoin intrinsic value, the novelty of the Bitcoin protocol, possible scenarios for bitcoin’s future, and the currency’s value as an investment.

______________________________________________________________________

CoinDesk: When we saw your name and credentials listed on the agenda, we thought maybe this is the responsible grownup who is going to tell us how crazy bitcoin is and how it won’t work. But it seems like after examining bitcoin with a skeptical academic eye, you are not dismissing it. When you first looked into bitcoin were you sceptical?

Susan Athey: I was introduced to bitcoin by some early aficionados. The first things I read when I got home were about bubbles. I pulled out my books about asset bubbles and tulips, and I worried that it was a Ponzi scheme in the sense that a lot of rich people were investing in it and telling their rich friends to invest in it, and so the price was going up as rich people were putting their money into it.

Also, the arguments in favour of it by some of the early adopters didn’t resonate with me: the idea that we needed it because something terrible was going to happen to the US dollar. In steady state as a store of value there may be better financial instruments.

Right now the price is growing, so it’s a good investment because the upside offsets the risk. But if it were in steady state and no longer growing, there may be better ways to protect your money than bitcoin in the United States.

What fascinated me and captured my imagination was the technology itself, understanding what the ledger meant, what it accomplished, and why a native currency was essential to the overall technology.

Let me unpack that a little bit. When we start thinking about the actual technology, the block chain, the ledger and the security around the ledger, that’s clearly a powerful thing. We have lots of other expensive and cumbersome institutions to establish that things of value have moved in ownership from one person to another. The block chain doing that in a decentralized, frictionless way – a pure way – is a powerful innovation.

But then the first question you ask is, ‘Why did you need to invent a new currency? Was that a gimmick? Something that you added on, a marketing tool to sell this thing that was really just a ledger?’ Then I realized that bitcoin itself is sort of fundamental to the ledger.

Let me explain that. I could have entries in a ledger that describe ownership of dollar bills. I could, in principal, use a security protocol: If I owned a ledger entry I could send a message to move a dollar to someone else. But that would just be a message. It would be a promise. We haven’t invented the technology to beam dollar bills and have them appear on your keyboard.

The SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) international system is a system of messages that tells people where money has moved, and then underneath it, the money actually moves through clearinghouse systems. Being able to send messages is very powerful, but it’s not as powerful as actually being able to send value.

The bitcoin is the only thing where the complete definition of ownership is the entry on the ledger. It has to be a native and new currency because the definition of the object is the ledger entry. That doesn’t correspond to a dollar or a piece of gold or something else. It is what it is. The entry on a ledger of a bitcoin is a fundamental unit whose value can be moved electronically through the security protocol.

Does the value of the technology mean that it’s not a bubble or a Ponzi scheme?

It’s a technology that can be used in a variety of ways. We’re perfectly capable of coming up with Ponzi schemes in the old economy. I couldn’t say that you couldn’t put a Ponzi scheme on top of bitcoin. But the technology has use and so, to me, the thing that gives bitcoin its fundamental value is its use.

The ability to move value electronically without counter parties and without IOUs and promises is very useful. If people use it, it will have value. That’s what makes me think that it does have intrinsic value.

One way to think about the transaction volume and the intrinsic value is that, at any moment in time, there’s a fixed number of bitcoins, and suppose you want to run half a billion dollars-worth of transactions through the system in a day.

There’s a fixed number of bitcoins, and a dollar value of transactions that needs to be supported on them, and each bitcoin can only be used once in a day, then the market cap of the bitcoins would have to rise to support the dollar value of transactions. There’s a market price for access to the bitcoins.

You have examined the relationship between transaction volume and price. So are you saying that the volume that you saw justifies the price?

Yes. That’s not a complete theory of price, because if the volume is driven by speculation, it’s possible that the volume could support the price, but it’s still possible that the price could fall, and the volume could fall.

I’m just saying that ‘the volume justifies the price’ isn’t a complete theory of what the future price should be. It’s more of a high level impressionistic view of the market that the prices and the transaction volume have moved together in a way that makes sense.

In steady state, when speculation is no longer the primary driver of volume, then it would be possible to relate the transaction volume to the price in a more defensible way.

A lot of the volume is related to speculation. What you might like to do is look at the parts of the ecosystem that are really being used for commerce. That transaction volume is the thing that will matter if you’re at a steady state. If it gets to a steady state size, then people are no longer coming into it because they think it’s going to grow. And then the value is determined more by the transactions on the system.

I have a very simple theory of what the price should look like in steady state. That theory, when applied to what happens today, doesn’t do badly in matching up with the data, but we’re not in steady state right now, so the theory is incomplete.

I have heard people warn that, one day, this value is going to evaporate and nobody is going to want bitcoins anymore.

It could happen. Let me give some of the scenarios where it would happen. One might be that there’s a security flaw found, or some sort of attack occurs that undermines the trust in bitcoin.

Given where we are today, I would imagine that in that scenario we would migrate onto an alternative coin. This is one reason why I think it’s good for the bitcoin ecosystem to have a number of other coins out there, because if something catastrophic happened to bitcoin, I think we could move in a pretty orderly fashion to another alt-currency, and while certainly there would be some redistribution of wealth in that transition process, the overall investments in the ecosystem would be maintained.

The venture capitalists are backing a number of firms in the virtual currency space. Most of them could pivot to another virtual currency with relatively little effort. In terms in the application layer, yes, it’s specific to bitcoin, but if it needed to, it could pivot.

Now, we understand the security properties of bitcoin very well. There would be a period of uncertainty with that new protocol and that testing process could lead to migration to a third alt-currency.

So if something catastrophic happened to the Bitcoin protocol, there would be disruption and there might be a period of uncertainty as we figured out what would be the best alternative, and maybe a rebirth of bitcoin once they had fixed whatever the problem was.

So, if people think everybody else is leaving bitcoin, everybody will get out of bitcoin, and the price will fall. There are many other types of businesses and investments that have that property.

For example, a marketplace that needs buyers and sellers. If the buyers and sellers all started migrating to another platform, you could see that. Think about a social network. We saw people using MySpace, and then they migrated to Facebook. We see many types of platforms and institutions and firms where the utility of the platform is based on other users using it.

That doesn’t mean you can’t value a Facebook, just because things are only useful when other people are using them. The risk profile of a bitcoin investment is less like a really safe store of value.

I actually look at it more like the risk profile of, say, a marketplace startup that has an initial user base. If the users stay and they interact with each other and it grows, it will have a lot of value. If the users pick another platform for whatever reason, then you won’t have any value. If you were buying stock or taking a venture position in this kind of a startup, you would realize there’s some probability of it going to zero and there’s some probability it’s going to grow big.

That’s the way that I look at bitcoin: there’s some probability that people shift to another platform for whatever reason; if they don’t, it grows and it has intrinsic value based on the transaction volume.

You consult with world governments on economic issues. Have you discussed bitcoin with national or international economic authorities? Are there widely divergent views around the world in regard to whether bitcoin is going to be important, whether they fear it, are ignoring it, and so on? What is the vibe you are getting?

One thing that’s kind of interesting is that the individual people from the various branches of government who have gotten interested in it, like almost everyone who takes a look at this, become fascinated by it.

This is just really interesting and challenging and intellectually fun. It’s fun because it’s hard. To think through all the implications of this new technology and to think through all the ways that various regulations could have good and bad consequences is a challenging problem. So one vibe that I get is that they, like the rest of the community, find it really intellectually engaging and challenging.

A message that I have found to be resonating is that it is very important that the environment in the US is friendly enough that the ecosystem stays here, because there are a lot of resources in the US to support that, and a lot of those resources will also encourage that development to favour more legitimate uses and safe uses. If it becomes illegal then it develops more in [unwanted] directions. It is in the US national interest to have this ecosystem develop here.

And you think that people in authority in the US understand that?

I think they do. Now, understanding that and being able to act on it in a timely and clear way are different things. No individual regulator can solve the whole problem, and banking regulation is an extremely challenging and complex area. But as it sinks in that this protocol and technology is here to stay, and that it needs to be dealt with, then the attention turns to dealing with it right.

At a fundamental level, you can certainly throw tacks in the road. You can make it difficult to buy things. Like the latest tax ruling makes it challenging for people to comply with tax law; they need to do a lot more accounting if they’re using bitcoin for small transactions.

For bitcoin investors, the tax ruling is actually helpful, because it provided clarity. If you’re just buying and selling, the tax ruling was quite simple. For someone who had a stash and was spending them on small purchases, you will probably need accounting software to file your taxes properly.

Those kinds of things can certainly be tacks in the road. Lack of clarity in banking relationships is a huge hurdle in the road. But at a fundamental level, you can’t really outlaw a ledger. This is a piece of computer software that has lots of different uses. You can regulate how fiat currency goes in and out of it, but you can’t really stop it from being used.

Some of its uses don’t relate directly to currency at all, some of the multi-signature applications where you have multiple people signing a transaction, keeping things in escrow, title, applications where you’re using this as a way to send a public message that has a timestamp that verifies it. Companies could build their own internal ledger. They could just fork the Bitcoin protocol, they don’t need to move any money in and out of banks, they just use this ledger to manage their internal books, if they move money across divisions within the firm.

There are lots of these applications out there, and many of them don’t really require the approval of regulators. Once you recognize that the technology’s out of the bag, it can’t be stopped, it has lots of interesting applications, it only makes sense to put a framework around it that makes it possible for it to work.

Are you working on research papers or projects related to bitcoin?

I’ve been working on analyzing the block chain and trying to describe the evolution of the block chain over time, what kinds of transactions are occurring, trying to document the flows of funds …

It’s a pretty challenging exercise to do well because of the idiosyncrasies of the way the block chain records information: the fact that there’s not one wallet number to one individual or entity on the block chain, and they don’t have any identifying information.

At an individual level you have a fair bit of noise in understanding what’s going on, on the level of a single block chain transaction. But you can still look at aggregate patterns. I’m doing research in this area.

It’s a bit time-consuming to get it right, but interesting patterns emerge from understanding the block chain. It’s only going to become more interesting as companies like BitPay expand their reach and allow more and more people to do transactions.

If actual people buying and selling things is only a few per cent of what’s going on, it’s a little bit less interesting to analyze, but that’s changing. I think that real commerce is in the double digits on the block chain, and it’s growing. People finding utility from the block chain, from an economic perspective, is much more interesting to study. I’m doing research and also in parallel waiting for the community to evolve to the point that it’s more interesting economically.

Is this a popular topic that graduate students want to sign on to research?

There’s a lot of interest. [However] there are not very many people yet who have mastered the technology required to study it well. My guess would be that within a year you’ll see an explosion of analyses.

Based on my own experience, there’s a pretty big startup cost to sort through all the institutional details, to really convince yourself that you’ve understood the informational content of the block chain. Think about some of the things that change over time.

People use anonymization techniques in order to disguise themselves. Use of that and the way that works changes over time. The identities of the exchanges and the way they interact with the block chain change over time. Some services do a lot of stuff off the block chain, while other services do a lot of things on the block chain.

It’s a moving target and a complex target to understand what’s on the block chain, what’s off the block chain. There’s a barrier to entry with this research, but I think people will surmount that barrier.

Have you purchased any bitcoins yourself?

To study any market you need to be a participant in the market, to understand the user experience and wrap your head around it. So I’ve been in and out of bitcoin, but at a low level. I’ve tried to try out different exchanges, and as new firms come on I’ve tried to experiment with them and see how they work.

If I was in the position of doing a lot of more risky investments, I think it totally makes sense that a lot of the wealthier investors have taken a position here. It’s got a very interesting growth profile.

One thing I would say about investing in it: most Americans should be holding US dollars and index funds. That’s the tried and true way to hold money. But for people who are looking for the kind of risk profile that’s associated with new ventures, which is some probability of zero and some probability of growth, an interesting thing about investing in bitcoin is that it democratizes access to an investment of that profile.

You as an individual are not offered a share of a venture capital fund. You can’t buy that. You have to be a large investor, and even if you’re a large investor, you still have to be invited to participate. So it’s interesting that not only has bitcoin democratized access to moving money, but also, at the moment, buying bitcoin is like taking a stake in a startup. That’s a risky bet, but it’s got high growth potential.

Instead of investing in five bitcoin startups, you can buy just bitcoin, and that’s probably going to go with the bitcoin startups. The one caveat to that is that many of the bitcoin startups could pivot if the Bitcoin protocol blew up. The bitcoin itself could go down.

One of the things about investing in bitcoin is that you wouldn’t want to be caught unawares if something started shifting, if another protocol started gaining traction.

So there are some issues with holding bitcoin, but it’s an opportunity if you wanted to take a very risky position in your portfolio, high risk/high return. It’s a much more liquid way to get that investment profile than many other investments that have the same risk/return profile.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

bitcoin investmentcoinsummitinterviewpricesSusan Athey
inShare8
Share
23

Previous Article
Goldman Sachs Tower
Why Goldman Sachs Got it Wrong on Bitcoin
Next Article
btc-e-april-fool
The Official CoinDesk Crypto April Fools' Day Roundup

silicon valley
Will Bitcoin Venture Capital Investment Reach $300m in 2014?

Just a month ago, the 2014 run rate for venture capital invested in bitcoin startups stood at $100m.
shutterstock_66611386
PBOC Officials Discuss Bitcoin as China’s
 
Im curious if people could give me advise on how to store your bitcoins?

is there a non electronic way to store it? Or can I store on say multiple USB with back up, and put the USB in a safe or something? Really I dont know too much about it but want to make sure i store the key properly..

:xyxthumbs
 
matty77 said:
Im curious if people could give me advise on how to store your bitcoins?

is there a non electronic way to store it? Or can I store on say multiple USB with back up, and put the USB in a safe or something? Really I dont know too much about it but want to make sure i store the key properly..

:xyxthumbs
Click to expand...

If you google 'safe bitcoin wallet' or 'safe bitcoin storage' there is loads of information and numerous options.
 
Hmm im going to go 50/50 with 2 different sites.

Will buy 1 bit coin for each to start off with then go from there.

Coinbase and blockchain seem to be the biggest and most well known so thats a good starting point I guess.

talk about diversification on investment strategies haha
 
Bitcoin Price Drops 10% as Chinese Exchanges Stop Bank Deposits
Jon Southurst (@southtopia) | Published on April 10, 2014 at 09:26 BST | Asia, News, Prices, Regulation
inShare4
Share
136

Bitcoin prices crashed today as Chinese businesses began receiving official deposit shutdown notices from banks, confirming recent suspicions of an impending crackdown. Exchanges will stop account recharging via bank accounts between now and 15th April.

Even though the news has been anticipated for over a week now, bitcoin prices sank under $403 from a high of $450.74 on the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index after companies began making public announcements on their sites.

coindesk-bpi-chart

Exchange BTCTrade.com made an announcement just before lunchtime in China, followed shortly after by BTC100.org and Huobi. Interestingly, it appears Chinese banks started with smaller exchanges before working up to those with larger trading volumes.

The announcements have all come via the banks themselves, as the PBOC has still not provided exchanges with any official announcement ‘on paper’.

BTCTrade’s statement read:

“With a heavy heart we make this announcement, that BTCTrade just received a telephone call from our bank the Kejicheng (Tech City) branch of China Agricultural Bank Hangzhou, that if we do not stop using our bank account to conduct bitcoin related businesses by 4/15 our account will be frozen. Therefore, we are forced to stop all RMB deposits by 4/15 midnight, although withdrawals will not be affected at [present].”

BTC China CEO Bobby Lee said his company would not be changing any of its banking arrangements until it receives some form of official notice, which hasn’t arrived yet.

“So far, we still have NOT received any official notices from Banks or the PBOC,” he said.

“I have indeed heard that some other exchanges apparently have received notice, but we have not.”

BTC38.com, which specializes in altcoin trading, suspended account funding via bank deposits on 4th April.

At that time, prices of digital currencies other than bitcoin dropped by 20% or more. Hardest hit were megacoin (MEC) and TAGcoin (TAG), which each lost around 50% of their value, while quark fell by 40% and dogecoin around 25%.

Even litecoin, which is traded on most major platforms and is not considered an altcoin per se in China, fell by over 20% in value last week. It is currently trading on BTC-e for just $10.22.
Focus elsewhere

OKCoin and FXBTC also stopped some account funding options after receiving notices from their banks and payment processor partners, but promised to continue trading otherwise after April 15th.

OKCoin CEO Star Xu said, however, that the company was focused more on future expansion plans, and would maintain regular daily operations otherwise.

Said Xu:

“OKCoin’s margin management, risk management, and cash withdraw and coin withdraw functions are working properly at this moment, OKCoin’s English version site will be up quickly, OKCoin will establish overseas offices and move servers there if needed.”

Community unperturbed

In fact, much of China’s bitcoin community shares that spirit and does not seem perturbed by regulatory moves.

“OK is always here, rumor-spreaders can leave now, we already have plans for April 15th,” said OKCoin’s Vice President He Yi.

The industry so far has shown nonchalance in the face of previous government bans, whether implied or actual, since last December, and have developed new ways for customers to move money in and out of exchanges without direct access to bank accounts. These have included a variety of third-party payment processors, pre-paid cards, and a voucher system.

Even BTCTrade’s announcement today ended on a positive note, informing of the company’s intentions to expand overseas in the near future.

“BTCTrade has always set our sites on the global market since coming online, and we have already registered companies in mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan and the US. We are planning to commence USD services soon, and the Japanese version of our website is already online and operational, and a new version will be online before 4/15.”

“Very soon we will publicly reveal our cold wallet address, and utilize 100% proof of reserves, in order to ascertain that the platform does not engage in any transactions, and that user assets are safe, open to public scrutiny.”

CoinDesk will continue to monitor and update this developing story.

ChinaHuobiPBOC
 
China’s Central Bank Governor: PBOC Won’t Ban Bitcoin
Pete Rizzo (@pete_rizzo_) | Published on April 11, 2014 at 14:02 BST | Asia, News, Regulation
inShare31
Share
218

The price of bitcoin recovered from a low of roughly $380 and rose past $420 at press time on 11th April, on the news that Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), had issued new statements potentially clarifying the central bank’s position on bitcoin.

According to reports, during Boao Forum, Xiaochuan offered his opinion on the nascent technology, saying that China would not seek to ban bitcoin and other digital currencies entirely.

Said Xiaochuan:

“It is out of the question of banning bitcoin as it is not started by central bank.”

Xiaochuan continued his statements, offering a potential new potential classification for bitcoin, and suggesting that the PBOC may be actively considering how to treat bitcoin.

Xiaochuan said:

“Bitcoin is more a kind of tradable and collectible asset, such as stamps rather than a payment currency.”

Boao Forum is a regional economic conference that seeks to address economic problems in Asia, and to promote collaboration on solutions.
Price rises

At press time, the price of bitcoin on the CoinDesk USD Bitcoin Price Index (BPI) rose sharply on the news, climbing more than 18% to pass $420.

china, pboc, ban

Likewise, the price of bitcoin on the CoinDesk CNY BPI was up 12.9% at press time to reach ¥2630.70, up from the day’s open of ¥2,329.99.

Screen Shot 2014-04-11 at 9.07.14 AM
Uncertainty lifts

News of the statement first surfaced at roughly 7:00 GMT, with the publication of a report by China Securities Network, a news outlet that provides real-time financial reporting, and later resurfaced on a number of similar news channels.

Though the remark may simply amount to an informal statement, it seemingly dispels fears percolating since March that China would potentially seek to ban bitcoin altogether.

Though, the PBOC is still likely looking to step up enforcement of past rules aimed at separating domestic banks from the alleged risk posed by the nascent digital currency industry.

In recent weeks, the price of bitcoin has dropped rapidly, from above $500 to below $400, on the news that China would seek to freeze the ability of major exchanges to conduct yuan deposits. Major exchanges have begun receiving notifications of account closures, and at present, Xiaochuan’s statements do not suggest a change in this policy.

CoinDesk is continuing to monitor this developing story.
 
Bit of a crash in bitcoin the other day as China moved to ban it (from use in their country).

Meanwhile...

New Colorado Marijuana Vending Machines Will Accept Bitcoin

Marijuana vending machines have long been rumored to debut en masse in certain US states, but on 12th April the first machine that can be accessed directly by consumers was finally unveiled at an invite-only event in Colorado.

Billed as the first marijuana vending machine in America, ZaZZZ units are perhaps more accurately the first ones that will not be placed behind sales counters. The machines offer a number of novel compliance features, including a driver’s license reader and a camera that captures video of users.

ZaZZZ machines also have another notable feature: They accept only a limited number of payment options including the ZaZZZ Card, cash, and perhaps most notably, bitcoin.
Click to expand...

http://www.coindesk.com/new-colorado-marijuana-vending-machines-accept-bitcoin/
 
skc said:
Interesting article about the Blockchain technology behind Bitcoin.

http://www.brw.com.au/p/tech-gadgets/behind_the_most_valuable_thing_about_rl1rStxztA6fmbZoXP8tRM
Click to expand...

I get what they are trying to do but it seems weird to me.

For every single use case mentioned in the article, by not using bitcoin and just adopting the blockchain technology (read: shared, zero trust database), all the participants would have to promise to not accumulate computing power greater than 51% of the total pool and yet have huge profit incentives to do so.

Also all the transactions will be shared across all nodes in the network, gonna be hard to do anything without every node owner knowing (or being able to know) what is going on.

I know the creator of mpex.co which is a serious exchange, basically like the CME or maybe NYSE for bitcoin stuff and to me that model seems much more in tune with reality.

My :2twocents on the article is that these banks are just scared of being behind the curve like they were for the internet. But they don't really know what they're doing, some capital will be misallocated to the mentioned startups and not much else of significance will happen. I'll be quite surprised if any permanent changes to how the banks operate come from research into blockchain technologies that doesn't leverage the existing massive decentralised pool of miners i.e. bitcoin itself.
 
matty77 said:
Hmm im going to go 50/50 with 2 different sites.

Will buy 1 bit coin for each to start off with then go from there.

Coinbase and blockchain seem to be the biggest and most well known so thats a good starting point I guess.

talk about diversification on investment strategies haha
Click to expand...

So i ended up moving house and literally ran out of time to buy the bitcoin, if i had bought the bitcoin price was around$450 per coin, so that would have been a $900 investment with a return of $20k at todays low prices! haha lol

should of could of..
 
Does anyone know if it is possible to dispute Bitcoin transactions? One of the safety nets of fiat currencies is that everything is traceable and you can easily obtain refunds if there is a dispute.

It occurred to me that because of the anonymity of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies that this is probably not an option with crypto transactions. You don't even know where your funds are going.

Anyone know more about this?
 
I'm no expert but I'm sure there is no way to dispute transactions as per it's nature/design. All transactions are final, there is no authority other than the blockchain itself. That's why stolen coins is a thing. Once they are transferred to another wallet, there's no reversing it and no way of knowing who owns that wallet.
Also consider a lot of malware these days demands ransom in the form of bitcoin. No traceability, no disputes, no reversals.

It's the wild west.
 
Indoril said:
I'm no expert but I'm sure there is no way to dispute transactions as per it's nature/design. All transactions are final, there is no authority other than the blockchain itself. That's why stolen coins is a thing. Once they are transferred to another wallet, there's no reversing it and no way of knowing who owns that wallet.
Also consider a lot of malware these days demands ransom in the form of bitcoin. No traceability, no disputes, no reversals.

It's the wild west.
Click to expand...
I think this aspect of cryptocurrencies is what will probably lead to its undoing in the long term. There are so many scams and ripoffs around and no protection for the average person. No checks and balances. No recourse to a higher authority. I imagine that cryptocurrency scams will only proliferate given that people are powerless once the funds have been transferred. The perfect theft is one where the victim cannot do anything about it.

There is a real downside to anonymity. The wild west it most certainly is.
 

Similar threads

Derrick Kow
Trump Rumoured to Establish U.S. Bitcoin Strategic Reserve
Replies
2
Views
1K
moXJO
M
Derrick Kow
  • Article
Bullish Signals Emerge: Market Liquidity Set to Flow into the Crypto Web3 Space
Replies
2
Views
955
Dona Ferentes
Dona Ferentes
BossMan.
Japan Exposure
2 3
Replies
52
Views
5K
eskys
E
Derrick Kow
Ethereum ETF Approval: New Era for Crypto Adoption
Replies
1
Views
776
qldfrog
qldfrog
Garpal Gumnut
Shorting Bitcoin - BITI - ETF
Replies
3
Views
2K
DannyB0000
DannyB0000
Top