- Joined
- 19 April 2006
- Posts
- 88
- Reactions
- 0
Nick Radge said:My comment was a tongue-in-cheek slap at Duc which I'm sure he see's as a fun poke. We've met on several ocassions and share respect. He's also twice my size, so I do need to show respect
If you look at my comments you'll see they were actually written on January 24 from which time my subscribers have (hopefully) been long. I did not foresee these events of the last 24-hours because I cannot foresee anything into the future. I do however assess low risk/high reward opportunities using a variety of technical techniques. Sometimes I get lucky like this one. The market ebbs & flows, back and forth. It may well be a short over the coming days if you're bold but that is still not enough to remove the long positions. When the analysis has be proven incorrect, then I'll remove them.
reece55 said:Fab
The recent rise in BHP stock price has been great - but mate, never say never. The stock was $24.00 almost exactly a month ago - $4.00 from where it is now. Personally, I would doubt we will see those levels again for a while, but to say that it will never do that is fraught with danger.
If you are looking to extract value out of dividends/capital returns, BHP is hardly the pick of the bunch. Try one of the many infrastructure trusts, buy a warrant and extract the dividend. These provide much better yields and are more stable - just my opinion though!
Cheers
By your count accounting policy manages to change real cashfows.ducati916 said:Hi Nick,
The thread is divided between traders [yourself + others] who are looking to trade significant swing points, and the Fundies arguing over the quality of the business and longer term implications.
Somewhere in here there is also an economic argument raging over the impact of the emerging economies, and their impact upon BHP amongst others.
As you know I am an Elliot Wave afficinado, with a Doctorate based on the research presented in relation to the applicability of EW. to econometric models of bank NPL's & interest rates.
By my count, BHP is doomed.
jog on
d998
If you can find a someone to second your opinion that LIFO/FIFO policy changes cashflows then I'm all earsducati916 said:haem & BSD
Accounting and cash-flows has already been detailed in previous posts.
If you still don't understand, or worse, still disagree, then so-be-it.
jog on
d998
rederob said:BHP is doomed, according to ducati.
I would find it hard to get a better "buy" indicator for a stock.
Accordingly, expect BHP to appreciate no less than 20% by year's end on the basis of extrapolating his contra-indicated "values".
haemitite said:If you can find a someone to second your opinion that LIFO/FIFO policy changes cashflows then I'm all ears
Even better - can you find someone else who also believes BHP should be $8 based on their book depreciation?
annalivia said:The most compelling reason for investing in BHP remains the attractive valuation. Given the general overvaluation of the market at this point, BHP remains a compelling opportunity. Unlike many stocks that are 'priced for perfection', BHP remains 'priced for disappointment'.
BHP currently trades on a price-to-earnings multiple of around 9.4 times, while the price to cash flow multiple is around 7.2 times. Profitability remains exceptionally high with return on equity expected to exceed 40 percent.
But what the hell do I know, I'm just a dumb value investor.
al
annalivia said:The most compelling reason for investing in BHP remains the attractive valuation. Given the general overvaluation of the market at this point, BHP remains a compelling opportunity. Unlike many stocks that are 'priced for perfection', BHP remains 'priced for disappointment'.
BHP currently trades on a price-to-earnings multiple of around 9.4 times, while the price to cash flow multiple is around 7.2 times. Profitability remains exceptionally high with return on equity expected to exceed 40 percent.
But what the hell do I know, I'm just a dumb value investor.
al
ducati916 said:This really is the underlying problem, BSD thought FORD = F and you think I said $8 = the value after book depreciation.
I actually said nothing of the sort.
If you wish to *quote* me, at least try to be accurate.
As to LIFO/FIFO, as stated, I am indifferent to your acceptance or understanding.
jog on
d998
might cause a blip on the graph - up ? or down i guess?Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum delegates have begun a week of meetings in Perth to discuss the mining industry. The Ministers Responsible for Mining meeting brings together more than 350 delegates from 19 of the 21 member economies of APEC, including Australia, the United States, China and Japan.
Also attending the meeting are executives from some of the world's major mining companies, such as BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, Alcoa and Barrick Gold. Federal Industry, Tourism and Resources Minister Ian Macfarlane says economic and environmental issues in the mining industry will be key points of discussion at this week's meeting.
The delegates will spend the week consulting with executives from some of the world's major mining companies before releasing a communique outlining a set of non-binding policies governing mining practice. Mr Macfarlane says the meeting is crucial to maintaining the growth of the region's resources sector. "Australia wants to see the economies of APEC develop," he said. etc
dhukka said:If you are truly a value investor then you know that price and value are independent of each other. You also know one of the inputs in the p/e ratio is price, how then can any measure that uses price as an input be an indicator of value? Answer, it can't. ROE's are what's important, whilst BHP is on track to post ROE of over 40% for 2 years running now you'd have to overly optimistic to think it could continue. 10 year average ROE currently stands at around 20% - still good but does it represent good value?
Personally I think the stock will keep running on the strength of the 1H07 result. Going forward what is the upsdie and downside risk to earnings? Upside: Further increases in commodity prices? Doubtful, increased production? Too far off to have any short term impact on earnings. So we are left with capital management initiatives. Downside: falls in commodity prices that can happen suddenly and have immediate impact on earnings, margins and returns on capital. The Downside is far more frightening than the upside is exciting IMHO.
BSD said:No Chief - I thought the FORD you were losing money on was FOMOCO and I was wrong in that assumption.
By the way FORD is a dog too.
You still are yet to show us how accounting treatments effect cashflow. And unlike me, are unable to accept your obvious MISTAKE.
We don't care whether you are indifferent to our absolute disagreement, with your MISTAKE, we just wan't you to accept that LIFO/FIFO policy changes DO NOT effect cashflow.
Then again, you can keep losing money making dumb mistakes...
Ducati prefers the obvious superior 'value' available in FORD
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a.peELHwidUY&refer=home
Going well it appears!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?