Maybe someone with a better knowledge of BHP than me has more detail, because I really don't know. It would be an interesting analysis to read.Honest question here, but does bhp still own any of the assets we got in the Billiton merger? Didn’t most of them get spun out again when they created south32.
I am just happy to off load the holding at 40.85. Didn't think I will see it hitting 40 but thanks to the talk on copper issue, price rise steadily this morning and hit the bull's eye.I'm just going from memory here, but the dual listing was adopted to appease shareholders, and also national governments, when BHP and Billiton merged many years ago.
Certainly, BHP's board have made some really bad decisions over time, but I don't think the merger with Billiton was one of them.
KH
The merger was one of their mistakes as far as I am concerned.I'm just going from memory here, but the dual listing was adopted to appease shareholders, and also national governments, when BHP and Billiton merged many years ago.
Certainly, BHP's board have made some really bad decisions over time, but I don't think the merger with Billiton was one of them.
KH
As a follow-up to my last BHP Post, I feel I should mention, for the Beginners Benefit, that I purpously did not mention the BHP/WPL Merger.My Personal Observations on BHP’s current TA for anyone that’s interested.
BHP is at a Crossroads situation ATM.
For the last 8 days BHP has been stuck within the current 3/12/21 Gap Up Area (Pages 203 to 212) – and to add to the confusion poor ole’ BHP is in, there are several Indicator Sell Divergences (page 108 & 109), and for 4 of the past 6 days, BHPs Candlesticks suggest that Sellers are in control (page 5) – then to add to that confusion BHP’s ST Trend is UP, BUT their 4 mth Trend is still DOWN.
Also the BHP SP is still having trouble breaking above the Top Linear Regression Line.
There are a few other TA signals, like recent Candle Formations & Candle Construction that are, ‘of concern’ – Another worry is when Green Candle Days like 10/12/21, cause ST Indicators to DROP.
The only real +ive I an see ATM is the reasonably ‘ST solid base’ around the $35.80 line
IMO, ATM there are not enough TA signals that suggest a future ST or LT trend – so my advice to BHP Punters is “ BE CAREFUL”.
IMO any further drop in the SP could lead to to abt $35.80.
IMO, on the other hand any rise in the SP will strike trouble @ the next Gap Down Area $42.17 to $44.78.
View attachment 134137
Remenber to DYOR.
Cheers.
DrB
This is elephant stuff.All the more remarkable, in that BHP is sitting at no. 7 in the top ten most shorted stocks on the ASX, with 8.7% of its stock out on loan.
Just out of curiosity..so what would be a good entry share price? ?The increased weighting of BHP from 6.2% to about 10% within ASX indices would compel many Australian investors to find spare cash to buy BHP shares to comply with their index-linked mandates. Index manager S&P Global told investors in December that “material” volatility in trading volumes would occur if the market were forced to absorb BHP’s unification in a single day.
S&P floated an idea with investors in recent weeks to stagger the impact of BHP’s unification over two trading sessions: 31 January and 21 March. But on Wednesday S&P said it had decided to implement the changes “all at once” before the 31 January trading session, if BHP shareholders approve unification on 20 January.
The vote, with 75% needed to succeed, will be interesting as some fund managers aim to vote against unification of BHP out of concern the arrangement would amount to a “substantial, permanent and unnecessary” transfer of value from holders of BHP’s Australian stock to those holding the miner’s London stock.
Short positions in Australian BHP stock have risen to 8.5 per cent of the register on January 4, from 3.7 per cent in August.
The large funds I am told will vote for a single register.The increased weighting of BHP from 6.2% to about 10% within ASX indices would compel many Australian investors to find spare cash to buy BHP shares to comply with their index-linked mandates. Index manager S&P Global told investors in December that “material” volatility in trading volumes would occur if the market were forced to absorb BHP’s unification in a single day.
S&P floated an idea with investors in recent weeks to stagger the impact of BHP’s unification over two trading sessions: 31 January and 21 March. But on Wednesday S&P said it had decided to implement the changes “all at once” before the 31 January trading session, if BHP shareholders approve unification on 20 January.
The vote, with 75% needed to succeed, will be interesting as some fund managers aim to vote against unification of BHP out of concern the arrangement would amount to a “substantial, permanent and unnecessary” transfer of value from holders of BHP’s Australian stock to those holding the miner’s London stock.
Short positions in Australian BHP stock have risen to 8.5 per cent of the register on January 4, from 3.7 per cent in August.
Price: Small price to pay, and its only over the short term.The large funds I am told will vote for a single register.
Game over imo with a retracement in price.
but after divesting the WPL shares ???The increased weighting of BHP from 6.2% to about 10% within ASX indices would compel many Australian investors to find spare cash to buy BHP shares to comply with their index-linked mandates. Index manager S&P Global told investors in December that “material” volatility in trading volumes would occur if the market were forced to absorb BHP’s unification in a single day.
S&P floated an idea with investors in recent weeks to stagger the impact of BHP’s unification over two trading sessions: 31 January and 21 March. But on Wednesday S&P said it had decided to implement the changes “all at once” before the 31 January trading session, if BHP shareholders approve unification on 20 January.
The vote, with 75% needed to succeed, will be interesting as some fund managers aim to vote against unification of BHP out of concern the arrangement would amount to a “substantial, permanent and unnecessary” transfer of value from holders of BHP’s Australian stock to those holding the miner’s London stock.
Short positions in Australian BHP stock have risen to 8.5 per cent of the register on January 4, from 3.7 per cent in August.
Thanks @Sean K . I keep on seeing your chart when I browse this thread and the recovery in price seems unbelievable from $40 up. Like you I am surprised there was no consolidation.I thought $44 was going to be a spot where BHP was going to consolidate a little, but looks like it's just running... Been an outstanding run.
View attachment 135603
“Under the BHP proposal, any shares in BHP Plc that VIA acquires will be exchanged for depository interests in BHP Limited, listed on the London Stock exchange.
“If approved, the unification is scheduled to be complete on 31 January 2022 at which time Vanguard Investment Australia will commence the process to transition the depository interests into ASX listed BHP Limited shares,” the fund manager said on Monday.
“Acquisition of BHP Plc and US E-minis will result in direct exposure to the US and UK markets, which will introduce a small amount of currency risk. Currency risk is the chance that the value of a foreign investment, measured in Australian dollars, will decrease because of unfavourable changes in currency exchange rates.”
“[G]iven the significance of the anticipated impact of the proposed unification on the Australian equities market, (the changes) are being made in the best interest of investors.”
“To maintain these diversification requirements, a 10% cap will be applied to BHP based on the closing price on 21 January 2022. On the effective date, Vanguard fund weightings in BHP may be over 10% due to market movements.”
BHP is one of the biggest dividend payers in the world – and just now it has about twice as many franked dividends on its balance sheet as a typical blue chip company would retain. In fact, there is about $US16bn ($22bn) worth of franked dividends sitting on the balance sheet looking for a home.
Very soon the big miner is going to get a chance to shower its Australian shareholders with these dividends as it reports in February and happens to be enjoying an exceptionally profitable phase of the commodities cycle.
At BHP the unification, which may cost up to $450m, has some temporary issues, but longer term it allows the miner to be leaner and more flexible. But it also smooths its transition out of coal and gas and into greener future-facing metals such as copper or potash. For investors who want to be part of that future, the merger makes sense. For those who want big dividend cheques in the months ahead, it is an opportunity worth consideration.
JAMES KIRBY WEALTH EDITOR
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?