- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Posts
- 1,941
- Reactions
- 2
I'm not quite up to date with this debacle but the gist I think is for cents I can buy a mountain of shares but also a complimentary liability. I understand everybody who has subscribed has done their butts!. So far so good??
It seems to me then someone is going to financially suffer...If I was a large holder I'd rather the company and its lenders to hurt rather than me personally. Therefore why wouldn't you just muster up a lot of shareholders who have everything to lose and nothing (as in zero) to gain and conduct an EGM and change the constitution or whatever other instrument needs changing so that the liabilitity is waived?
Everybody gets to be the proud owner of a piece of rubbish.
This would I (if plausible and successful) give rise to some really interesting discsussions about placement fees and underwriting fees if presumably the company was placed into receivership or liquidation. MacBanks creativity would surely be on stage...
I am not a lawyer and this is simply the rantings of someone who does not have a mountain of these shares or gives a damm about the liability.
I ask myself why can't the company just run a public auction/book build process for forfeited stock - just like the old NL companies I spoke about a few posts above used to do on their no obligation contributing (CA) shares - that would probably get the best return for BCS with the least headache.
Thats a very interesting suggestion. In fact its quite possible some of the institutional holders aren't that keen on paying the subsequent installments any more either,
haha - there's an interesting thought - far fetched as you imply, given they'd have likely already entered enough contractually binding commercial obligations with suppliers to cover the bulk of the funds they hold, if not more.Edit: Just another mischevious thought - what if you could just buy enough shares at 0.1 cent, to get the company to pay you the rest of the remaining cash, and then shut down the company? As a shareholder, and not even a director, you would have not signed any director's gaurantees for anything.
However it may as well be $10,0000 because I dont have that kind of cash.
I have never invested in shares before. Its only because I work for Thiess who are involved in the project I thought I would chuck $500 at it.
rocket,
you may have already answered this,
but what was your thinking when u purchased at .001c and saw no buyers in the market depth?
i assume you viewed the depth prior to purchase as implied by your post 27. on pg2.
thanks
James
If you have not done so all ready plonk them in the sell queue at 0.1c.I bought them in early november when there were still plenty of buyers at 1c. I jumped in the queue and waited a few days to get them...I knew they werent bhp but was perfectly fine having a gamble with a couple of K and had no probs if I lost the money.
I've been looking at the PDS, and wonder if I might have found an angle for the lawyers to pursue:
The BrisConnections PDS does not adequatly inform investors about the potential risks in investing in the company. As Briscon have misinformed investors through the PDS, they can't then use the provisions described in that PDS to take debt recovery action against shareholders.
Now the PDS does talk about risk. There are five pages of it listing bad things that could happen that would adversely affect the share price. But the PDS always assumes that there is a share price. That is where it fails. Events have shown that the is no share price for Brisconnections shares. Most shareholders would gladly give their shares away, or pay to get rid of them. Brisconnections represents a failure of the market for investors, and the PDS did not warn of this possible risk.
Does anyone think that this line of argument has a future?
I just checked. They do have voting rights.I wonder if the units even have any voting rights attached to them anyway - as they are not ordinary shares they may not.
If the lack of a market for the shares is listed as a risk then no.Does anyone think that this line of argument has a future?
Someone just bought 100,000 of them...for 100 bucks they now have a 2 hundred thousand liablity...
cuttlefish said:In fact - this is the pithy three liner that the ASX provides for investors under the risks part of their 'what are shares' page - quite pathetic really (see below). Ultimately it is the ASX that provides the mechanism whereby these highly risky instruments can be exchanged.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?