Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
I laugh, as soon you will not have a job to pay the mortgage.
By this I presume you mean that, due to the wonders of globalization and labor arbitrage, you can now employ Indian, Chinese or whatever labor at a fraction of the cost of employing someone locally. True enough, we can't compete with people who can be exploited by paying them subsistence wages, often in substandard working conditions we would never except, in their home country all done under the guise of being "competitive". What of the decimation of people's jobs and futures locally in the name of ever greater profits? Such is the essence of capitalism where profit motive overrides all other considerations.
Sorry for the diversion off topic but satanperca, you are just contributing to the very problem you are highlighting here. Sounds like you have essentially offshored your business already with just a satellite office in Aus. How many local jobs were trashed in the process I wonder? How many loyal, hard working local staff were told to train offshore workers to replace themselves prior to being sacked? What's the human cost of your business decision? Care to share that part of your business success story?
I don't think the average Australia really understands the international competitive world we live in today. Why should I pay a graphic designer $75K here when I can employee three for that price in Vietnam
...
I ask you this, while we have a central bank determining interest rates and not the market
I have friends in India, who live the life of Riley on a fraction of what it would cost them here. It's the unaffordable housing, the lack of infrastructure, and a generation that has been dumbed down by decades of neglect, that has caused this problem.
we now have to pay an additional "insurance premium" to protect ourselves against loss of income.
Really! You think that when the average Aussie sees the made in China label on just about everything, does more and more shopping online and steps into a JB HiFi filled with only foreign made goods they don't understand what's happening with global sourcing and competition?I don't think the average Australia really understands the international competitive world we live in today.
And I might add, why pay someone here to make clothing when it can be done in Bangladesh so much cheaper! Yes, we should all envy the lifestyles of those living in the likes of Vietnam, Malaysia and India. While we live in our overpriced houses they have millions living in squalid huts working for peanuts (their primary competitive advantage). I wonder though when the wages eventually rise in these countries and they aspire to the standard of living we have here, where will the opportunities arise to exploit cheap labor again? Mongolia perhaps?Why should I pay a graphic designer $75K here when I can employee three for that price in Vietnam, all trained by our own institutions, RMIT. How does a bookkeeper demand $35 an hour when I can have a suitably trained person in Malaysia for $15, or an IT person $100K when I can have a team for that in India - ah the cost of living and supporting property prices.
By this I presume you mean that, due to the wonders of globalization and labor arbitrage, you can now employ Indian, Chinese or whatever labor at a fraction of the cost of employing someone locally. True enough, we can't compete with people who can be exploited by paying them subsistence wages, often in substandard working conditions we would never except, in their home country all done under the guise of being "competitive". What of the decimation of people's jobs and futures locally in the name of ever greater profits? Such is the essence of capitalism where profit motive overrides all other considerations.
Sorry for the diversion off topic but satanperca, you are just contributing to the very problem you are highlighting here. Sounds like you have essentially offshored your business already with just a satellite office in Aus. How many local jobs were trashed in the process I wonder? How many loyal, hard working local staff were told to train offshore workers to replace themselves prior to being sacked? What's the human cost of your business decision? Care to share that part of your business success story?
Globalization is the great equalizer, dragging everyone down to the lowest common denominator. Nothing to celebrate IMO.
Yes, you must be right. All the people around me working 50+ hours a week are really just lazy bastards looking for a handout, they are just fooling everyone. From a recent article "Nearly 1.7 million Australian employees - that's about one in six - work 49 hours or more each week, the latest census showed." Yep, we Aussies are just plain lazy.I have and find the vast majority happy and willing to work for a better future, not expecting it to be handed to them.
I'd say you are doing more than just working within the rules but actively exploiting them.I wonder how many products surround you that are made off shore, your clothes, computer, television etc. Did you stop to consider when purchasing who made them and under what conditions. No. I didn't write the rules, just have to work within them.
The point is you don't care and neither does any other employer. Profit potential is all that matters.As for trashing local jobs, I stuck it out for long enough employing locals, at the cost of my own financial situation. Did you or any one else care, I think not and nor should you. Just another person on their high horse, but are you willing to put your money where your mouth is. Again, I think not.
Of course I do and internationally as well. My market participation is just that, for profit, just like your trade in human capital is for profit only and not for the lofty claim of benefiting greater society.Do you invest or trade? FXtrader implies you trade, does that benefit greater society or just you. Be careful what you wish for.
I was clarifying the reason for the inflation target, as you seemed to disagree with the concept. It will help to reduce the cost of wages in real terms, as well a falling AUD. Real wages and the AUD will continue to fall as long as we are uncompetitive in the global arena. I think you'll find we'll stabilise well short of a 3rd world nation.Zedd, inflation positive or low we are no longer competitive in the world market, if it wasn't for the dirt we dig up we would be a third world country
Speak for yourself. In my travels over the last two years I'm confident I can go toe-to-toe with anyone I've met in intellect, creativity and work-ethic and I'm not the best the nation has to offer by far. We might have some tough years ahead of us, but the future is anything but bleak for Australia.We are no longer clever nor inventive.
Even worse I work for a Japanese car company.Exactly, so what do you do to prevent it? As he/she sits in front of a foreign made computer.
I had to laugh at this. Are you honestly comparing the affordability of suitable housing, the level of infrastructure and our literacy/education levels to India and saying we're left holding the wooden spoon?
Commonwealth Bank Australia - ...
Commonwealth Bank Australia - Earnings more optimised than ever
● CBA reported (company defined) FY13 cash earnings of $7,819 mn (up 10% on $7,113 mn FY12), which was 3% better than both our $7,597 mn estimate and the $7,614 mn consensus average (with earnings surprise to our estimates coming through revenues and, to a lesser extent, bad debt charges).
● What we liked about the result: Reasonable lending balance growth; strong margin expansion; improving asset quality (except in unsecured personal); wealth FUA flows and balance growth; and continued half- early ROE expansion.
● What we didn’t like: FY14E cost headwinds that appear to challenge the prospect for positive FY14E cost/revenue "jaws"; declining collective provision coverage (acknowledging reduced BankWest overlays); and softer-than-expected equity Tier 1 ratio (IRRBB RWA inflation).
● Following the FY13 result we have upgraded our estimates by 1% with an unchanged $71.00 target price and an unchanged UNDERPERFORM rating.
I heard a rumour that during the last G20, there was agreement to the concept of "bail ins" where the depositors of banks will take hair cuts when the bank fails....
Anyone got better detail on this?
Not depositors, bondholders. In essence their bonds become common equity. The idea of modern banking is always to ensure depositors lose their money only when every other avenue has been exhausted. The concept of bail ins is designed to lessen the liability on governments if a bank fails.
Yeah ok, got that part. What I heard though was that if, in the event of a possible failure, the depositors would see a portion of their savings converted to some kind of bond....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?