Baby Boomers and the Impending Apocalypse

[numbercruncher]

Good little read here about boomers and possible US bankruptcy

http://www.moneyweek.com/file/37424/the-silver-tsunami-about-to-hit-america.html

Casey-Kirschling is the first of America’s baby-boomers to have applied for her old age pension, heralding the start of what demographers are calling the “silver tsunami” – as the first wave of the 78 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964 reach the age of 62, entitling them to monthly retirement benefits from the country’s rapidly dwindling social security funds. With the US facing an estimated $50trn in future benefit obligations, some fear we may look back on this as the point when America started to go bankrupt.

How did the country get into this trouble?
Simple demographics – as the American population has aged over the past 50 years, there are fewer taxpayers supporting those who have retired. As World War II drew to a close, there were 42 workers paying money into the social security system for each retiree drawing funds out. Today the ratio is down to just three workers per retiree. And in the course of the next 20 years, that ratio will fall to two to one. The problem is that the number of Americans over the age of 65 (currently 37 million) is set to double to nearly 80 million by 2045, while the size of the workforce is set to grow by just 20%.

But the US government should also admit its part in the crisis. Successive administrations have plundered the social security system for their own ends. When Congress passed a deal to raise social security tax to ostensibly solve the impending “boomday” crisis in 1983, the US government spent every penny of the surplus right up until 2001 – about $35bn a year.

But as one US baby-boomer pointed out to The Times, the system was always flawed. When Social Security was drawn up in 1938, life expectancy was about 58. The system simply wasn’t designed for a generation that is now expected on average to live to the ripe old age of 82.

What strain will it put on the system?
“This is the single biggest economic challenge of our era,” says Brian Riedl of the conservative Heritage Foundation. About 49% of male and 53% of female baby-boomers are expected to take the option of early retirement – drawing a monthly cheque worth 75% of the full payment for up to four years. The current average state pension stands at $1,079 (£500) a month, which won’t exactly sustain a decadent lifestyle, but the real elephant in the room is Medicare. “It won’t take much sky-diving, bungee jumping and white water rafting before we all require new hips, knees, pacemakers and steel plates in our heads,” notes PJ O’Rourke in The Weekly Standard. With health costs escalating, there is no telling how much the baby-boomer medical bill will swell to.

This is a generation that “created a way of life entirely based on drugs”, says O’Rourke – and you’ll see them do it all over again with over-the-counter pharmaceuticals. Except this time, it will be the taxpayer who picks up the bill. By 2013, Medicare will be paying out more than it takes in from payroll taxes. By 2019, it will have run dry.

(Article continues below)

Advertisement

Will anything be done?
There is a reason why Americans refer to the social security system as the “third rail” of American politics – touching it can lead to political death. When you consider that those 78 million baby-boomers account for a third of the American electorate, it’s difficult to see how Washington will muster the political will to make the tough changes that are necessary.

Maintaining pension and healthcare benefits at current levels alone would require taxes to increase by 33%-50% by 2030, notes Andrew Ward in the FT. In truth, shortfalls in social security could easily be made up by a modest rise in the retirement age. But addressing the Medicare crisis would require a radical overhaul of the American health system. Who in Washington would bite the bullet there?

Is the US the only country in trouble?
No. Japan and Britain had baby booms of their own after World War II; the average age in Japan is set to jump from 43 to 55 by 2050. With Japanese retirees relying on federal pensions for two-thirds of their retirement income, the country is going to feel the pinch, says Terrie Llody in Japan Today. Fortunately for the young, Japanese parents were savers, with the over-50s holding 80% of the country’s $13.1trn in personal assets.

The same can’t be said for Britain; think tank Reform says that 18 to 34-year-olds face an effective 49% tax rate as they fund the pension and health care costs of their elders, as well as paying tuition fees. With the number of over-75s in Britain set to grow by 76% to 8.2 million by 2031, they could be paying out for a long time to come.

Where will it all end up?
“In 1967 they were the flower children,” says Suzanne Goldenberg in The Guardian, “now it’s all about the cheque.” Baby-boomers certainly haven’t left much for their kids – remortgaging their homes to the tune of $8trn and going on a colossal spending spree that has seen consumer debt climb to $11trn. But the baby-boomers are just doing what they do best, says PJ O’Rourke – shaping America to their will and making the entire nation conform to their ideals and tastes. That won’t be popular with the young professionals facing the prospect of funding their elders’ ski trips and summ cruises through their taxes. “America’s fate can be summed up in one word,” says O’Rourke: “Youthanasia”.

 

[Happy]

From ABC, 3 Dec. 07

Baby boomers advised to rethink investments

A financial services provider says baby boomers will have to look at new ways of investing in order to maintain the standard of living they are used to.
James Holt from Zurich Financial Services says bonds are a traditional source of income for baby boomers, but they are not yielding as much as they once did.
He has told ABC television's Midday Report that investors should look at new alternatives such as "buy write" funds, which generate income without any leverage.

"One of the key advantages is it can generate much higher income than what they're getting out of traditional bonds and things like that but also it can reduce their risk in equity portfolios," he said.
He says investors should look to new solutions to supplement their retirement income.

"On the one hand baby boomers can't get the yield like they used to - that's one challenge - and the other side of it is that they need more and more growth in retirement as they live longer and longer," he said.
"So buy writes provide a bit of a solution - they can be structured so they provide high levels of income, but also some long-term growth, which is what bonds don't provide traditionally."
Mr Holt says the subprime crisis in the United States has also highlighted the risks in highly geared investments.

Looks like a plug for Aurora Infrastructure Buy-Write Income Trust