I contacted Jon several times this afternoon re this ambiguity and a few other issues.
LEts say we dont see eye to eye on a few issues.
But credit where credits due. The legalities of the canadian listing dictate what can and cant be said and in what words it has to be said.
Yes the prospectus is a lawyers dream and everyone elses nightmare. But apparently thats the way it is and live with it.
I stressed the ambiguity and confusion that exists and Jon casted an eye over HC to see what i was referrring to , so hes well aware of your concerns.
Theres an announcement due out as a quarterly or some other form on 31st jan which is only a few days away, so id suggest we all cool down and wait, see whats in that, and then if we are still in the dark or confused then we make contact asking for clarity.
Lets just wait see what comes out.
In reference to the tsx lisitng i posted earlier everything ive ben able to extract from everyone im in contact with, so go up the page and read. It appears end of feb is the target date, but its largely out of AUT control from what i can gather.
I expressed the concern that a lot of the info in relation to the Canadian listing is burried in copious detail and v ery inclear and i suggested STRONGLY the need for a specific release clarrifying the issue to share holders.
Jon whilst bristeling and giving me a rather short answer was as always proffessional in his responses and careful not to breach asx rules of disclosure.
He expressed a desire that sometimes holders just need to trust managment and allow them to go about thier job, which is a fair enough request, but i guess it works both ways , as a holder i also expect to be kept fully informed, and i personally think it takes jack shiv effort to put out an update.
I also expressed my concern about the issue price for the CR which lets say we 100% disagree on.
Looking forward to jan 31st announcment.
LEts say we dont see eye to eye on a few issues.
But credit where credits due. The legalities of the canadian listing dictate what can and cant be said and in what words it has to be said.
Yes the prospectus is a lawyers dream and everyone elses nightmare. But apparently thats the way it is and live with it.
I stressed the ambiguity and confusion that exists and Jon casted an eye over HC to see what i was referrring to , so hes well aware of your concerns.
Theres an announcement due out as a quarterly or some other form on 31st jan which is only a few days away, so id suggest we all cool down and wait, see whats in that, and then if we are still in the dark or confused then we make contact asking for clarity.
Lets just wait see what comes out.
In reference to the tsx lisitng i posted earlier everything ive ben able to extract from everyone im in contact with, so go up the page and read. It appears end of feb is the target date, but its largely out of AUT control from what i can gather.
I expressed the concern that a lot of the info in relation to the Canadian listing is burried in copious detail and v ery inclear and i suggested STRONGLY the need for a specific release clarrifying the issue to share holders.
Jon whilst bristeling and giving me a rather short answer was as always proffessional in his responses and careful not to breach asx rules of disclosure.
He expressed a desire that sometimes holders just need to trust managment and allow them to go about thier job, which is a fair enough request, but i guess it works both ways , as a holder i also expect to be kept fully informed, and i personally think it takes jack shiv effort to put out an update.
I also expressed my concern about the issue price for the CR which lets say we 100% disagree on.
Looking forward to jan 31st announcment.