Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,799
- Reactions
- 10,581
Anzac Day is certainly a more important day for me, and more embedded in the Australian psyche than Australia Day.
gg
Hear hear. Nothing significant or special about a fleet of boats arriving at a land mass all those years ago. Although to me these days, public holidays have no sentimental, patriotic or celebratory value.
I feel patriotic remembering the sacrifices of our forefathers during the World Wars and patriotic when Lleyton or the Kangaroos or the athletes or the swimmers or any sportsman or sportswoman that steps up on the world stage or an inventor or an (honest) entrepreneur.
Maybe because these things are more honest and real.
I feel patriotic...... when Lleyton ....
Anzac Day is certainly a more important day for me, and more embedded in the Australian psyche than Australia Day.
gg
The problem that most Australians have is that change is not inherent in their nature, or at least rapid change. They like things to evolve.
That is why the Republican Movement fell on their collective arses...
I thought they failed because of the way the question was phrased? From memory (and I could very well be wrong) it was something like:
"would you like to be a republic with a president chosen by this particular method with these particular powers?"
rather than
"would you like to be a republic?"
with the question of how a president was elected, and what powers they would have being decided separately?
Also, I see the Opposition want us to participate in "affirmation ceremonies". WTF? Before they got booted out they tied school funding to the requirement for an Australian flag out the front of the school, introduced the anti-Muslim test (immi. test) and now they want this. Are they really that insecure about being Australian?
No Sid they failed because the Australian public didn't trust the model that was put forward. A model that would have consolidated power in and control by the present political class comrade.
Sorry, isn't that what I said? If the questions was simply "Do you want a republic?" it probably would have passed.
Galaxy poll commissioned by News Limited has found 44 per cent of Australians are in favour of becoming a republic, with 27 per cent against.
But the same poll shows 27 per cent of people want to remove the Union Jack from the flag, while 45 per cent want to retain the present flag
It would appear that us Australians certainly are a confused bunch:
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/ray-martin-leads-push-for-new-flag-20100125-msu3.html
I thought they failed because of the way the question was phrased? From memory (and I could very well be wrong) it was something like:
"would you like to be a republic with a president chosen by this particular method with these particular powers?"
rather than
"would you like to be a republic?"
with the question of how a president was elected, and what powers they would have being decided separately?
This is exactly and precisely correct. Howard played it very, very cleverly - he knew that the republicans couldn't agree on the model (yet) so by taking this path he could be seen to give them their "chance" without any realistic prospect of success, and then shelve it for years. Like him or hate him, we can't deny that John Howard was a very clever politician.
You can all stop your bleating about the flag. The Union Jack gives us perspective as to our past whilst the wonderful Southern Cross shows we are a forward looking nation. I cannot imagine a flag that embraces the spirit of any country so well as ours.
You can't blame Johnny for everything.
Its like blaming Whitlam for all the welfare, broken homes and people called River with a double barreled second name and a drug habit.
Whitlam and Johnny are gone.
gg
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?