IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,650
- Reactions
- 4,725
At least they will have rhyme and reason, I'm not rich enough to vote for your mob.lolSo tax cuts promised in July not happening...tick
Environment minister dropped......tick
Review into pensions and Superannuation.......tick, bend over SP your heroes are going to shaft you.
$40 bil black hole funding about to get filled by cuts to seniors who would have guessed.......thanks Queensland.
So it's ok for bigots and the poorly educated to get expert advice but not for those better educated and with a functional value system?
Half the reason we are where we are is because the "experts" are regularly consulted and equally regularly ignored.
Humid, another rusted on Labor voter, said exactly the same thing before the election. The only difference, it was going to be Bill that was going to do it to me.bend over SP your heroes are going to shaft you.
.
I don't find that a compelling argument.Education of itself is a good thing. The problem is when it leads to hubris and that does seem to occur in some professions more than others. Under that situation no amount of advice from actual experts serves any purpose since it will be either dismissed as wrong or simply ignored.
A classic example of current relevance is the energy situation. Of all who've commented over the past quarter century of "reform" one thing stands out. Focusing purely on the economic aspects, so ignoring technical and environmental matters, the one group who got it completely wrong was the economists. Unions, operators, tradesmen, engineers, people writing editorials in newspapers, environmentalists and so on were all at least somewhat closer to the truth on the economic aspects of what was being done than the economists were.
Half the value in education is knowing what you don't know and accepting that as being so.
Plenty of people could and did spot that the economic crowd and their political supporters were embedding huge inefficiencies and making wrong assumptions about things they knew little about but those calls fell on deaf ears. Now the community's left with a cost exceeding $1 billion a month not because of education or expertise but because of hubris.
Assuming they're not lacking in intelligence those with a lesser education have an advantage in that they're generally well aware that they don't know about certain things. They're also usually quick to spot ideology from practical information.
I don't find that a compelling argument.
The NEM came about 20 years ago under Howard so power monopolies could be broken down and a "competitive market" result.
The NEM certainly needs some tweaking, but overall the "rules" are not too bad. You have pointed out issues which are very technical but, as I see it, the outcome will be that poor performers fall by the wayside.
The biggest problem with the NEM is its dominance by federal Energy Ministers who have been largely incompetent.
I am on the NEM's mailing list and market players are not backward presenting their ideas and explaining why things go wrong, and what needs to be done to fix things. The fixing bit keeps getting thrown into the too hard basket.
Unfortunately the feds pandered to the easy fixed poles and wires issue, gold plating them, instead of paying attention to how the electrons got there in the first place. If you want to know why we have amongst the highest electricity prices in the world, look out the window.
Shocking waste.
Well, you can't blame me because I didn't vote for them (or any of the Komrades), but all I have to say is....So tax cuts promised in July not happening...tick
Environment minister dropped......tick
Review into pensions and Superannuation.......tick, bend over SP your heroes are going to shaft you.
$40 bil black hole funding about to get filled by cuts to seniors who would have guessed.......thanks Queensland.
The economists said that a competitive market would be cheaper.I don't find that a compelling argument.
The NEM came about 20 years ago under Howard so power monopolies could be broken down and a "competitive market" result.
It would be and should be, but power generation is not the whole story.The economists said that a competitive market would be cheaper.
Well, you can't blame me because I didn't vote for them (or any of the Komrades), but all I have to say is....
QUEENSLANDER!
NB: WA looks pretty blue too @IFocus
Where the issue arose was with multiple plants in fairly close proximity who were sharing workshop facilities, equipment, spares and all sorts of other things.
Yep Labor took a flogging in WA as well but reading SP's comments Labor was attacking the middle class pretty well sums it up....... I think the Coalition actually will as they don't have the money.
Oh forgot another one
The surplus that Morrison has made (next year this year....clear?) gone already......tick
$600 bil double again in three years anyone.....tick
Thanks Queensland.....that line will be very useful for the next three years.
Surplus was highly unlikely to happen under ALP or Coalition's watch. They've all been claiming future surpluses for the last 5 years.
The tax cuts for next year will happen, they will be late but they will happen.
off topicWhere the issue arose was with multiple plants in fairly close proximity who were sharing workshop facilities, equipment, spares and all sorts of other things.
Eg Plant A has sufficient demin water production on site for rouinte operations but the practice for a restart following a major outage was to truck more in from plant B just down the road which had much greater capacity. Or if that failed then could have got it from plant C not far away so there was a backup plan for everyone yes.
Then plant B and plant D were both depending on plant C for their auxiliary fuel supplies.
They were all sharing workshops and so on with the only one able to do some critical works on plant D being in-house at plant E.
Duplicating all that cost a fortune and some of it never was really sorted - to this day there's work that goes overseas.
My point there has nothing to do with the power industry though, I've only used that example since it's one I know about but my point is about there being no point calling upon expert advice if you're not going to listen to it.
When I got an arborist to check the trees on my property I did so because I wanted to know if they're safe or not. I didn't tell them I wanted them to be safe or unsafe, I said I wanted to know the facts and paid them to tell me.
Which brings up another point that's of some relevance to the way politicians and those close to them think and that's about a concept known as "self-regulation". That's another one where there's a divide between the working class and the upper class (for want of better terms).
Those at the coal face will admit that it's not a great system since money talks and if you want a certain outcome then just find someone who'll do it. Those at the other end of the scale pretend with a perfect poker face that this isn't how things work and it's all above board and so on. As if......
Surplus was highly unlikely to happen under ALP or Coalition's watch. They've all been claiming future surpluses for the last 5 years.
The tax cuts for next year will happen, they will be late but they will happen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?