wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
Okay, so long as we agree not to quote any other journalist.Andrew Bolt......can we all agree not to quote him in this thread? The man has little to no credibility in my view.
He's not extreme left wing, so couldn't possibly have any credibility on anythingCan we pick apart his argument?
Yes.Can we pick apart his argument?
Yes.
Shall I do it in this thread?
I think its important and relevant to the election.Yes.
Shall I do it in this thread?
No, that's just uneducated wording.Bill Shorten is conning you: he is selling you a massive global warming policy without saying what it would cost and what it would do.
Silly question! Do you want to sell goods and services overseas, yes or no?Would you consider buying even a toaster without knowing either the price or whether it works?
This shows how ignorant Bolt is. Labor is proposing the NEG as a backstop on power. The NEG was coalition policy before coal lit a fuse that shunned Turnbull's ideas.So why risk buying the Labor leader’s scheme to radically change how we power our businesses and homes?
Okay, so long as we agree not to quote any other journalist.
Oh you mean he might be an activist like all those at theABC, The Guardian, Vox, Buzzfeed et al?Questionable description.
Just so we don't forget how the Liberal party destroyed Malcolm Turnbull and itself over energy policy.
How Malcolm Turnbull's Easter tweets help Bill Shorten's cause and Labor's campaign
Turnbull resurrects the NEG
The weekend standout, however, was the intervention of Malcolm Turnbull, who launched a series of pointed tweets about the National Energy Guarantee (NEG).
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04...ter-tweets-helped-the-labor-campaign/11034950
"No doubt you will post the evidence to back that claim." From another threadBolt where do you start.............lets try money, get everyone angry then sign them up for the advertisers sound familiar?
Journalist? he may have been once long ago but really he is more entertainer than journalist like Jones etc.
Bolt is so predictable it is pointless to read his articles, absolutely bereft of intellect just read the comments they are hilarious.
Still he sucks money writing absolute crap got to be making a mill a year surely.
You might like to hear what a former PM said."No doubt you will post the evidence to back that claim." From another thread
Wasn't the court case against a guy that was a corrupt ahole?You might like to hear what a former PM said.
Or see how he skates on thin ice wrt to the law and ACMA.
I use him as a benchmark for quality in journalism, specifically where little exists.
I suppose some people might characterise Bolt like that.Wasn't the court case against a guy that was a corrupt ahole?
He is an opinion writer. Facts don't matter to the majority of them. Only cherry-picked data.I suppose some people might characterise Bolt like that.
" I have not been satisfied that the conduct [of Mr Bolt] is exempted from unlawfulness by s 18D. The reasons for that conclusion have to do with the manner in which the articles were written, including that they contained erroneous facts, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language and that as a result, the conduct of Mr Bolt and HWT is not justified in the manner required by s 18D of the RDA."
Opinions have the currency that their audience confers. However, opinions themselves cannot be judged in terms of right or wrong.He is an opinion writer. Facts don't matter to the majority of them. Only cherry-picked data.
And that's left and right. That doesn't mean all of them are wrong 100% of the time.
Yep, the left loves to bag out Bolt for opinion, but the MSM in most cases is also opinionHe is an opinion writer. Facts don't matter to the majority of them. Only cherry-picked data.
And thats left and right. That doesn't mean all of them are wrong 100% of the time.
But people credit them with more power than they actually have.
Bolts no threat....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?