Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Australian Federal Election - 2019

Jump to new
Junior said:
Andrew Bolt......can we all agree not to quote him in this thread? The man has little to no credibility in my view.
Click to expand...
Okay, so long as we agree not to quote any other journalist.
 
bigdog said:
Bill Shorten is conning you: he is selling you a massive global warming policy without saying what it would cost and what it would do.
Click to expand...
No, that's just uneducated wording.
Labor consulted with industry to see what they believed was needed in order to participate in a global economy with repercussions for inaction.
The policy itself is of mitigation, not warming - so Bolt is typically bereft of brains.
bigdog said:
Would you consider buying even a toaster without knowing either the price or whether it works?
Click to expand...
Silly question! Do you want to sell goods and services overseas, yes or no?
If you do, then choose an option which is credible, sustainable and allows you to prosper into the future.
bigdog said:
So why risk buying the Labor leader’s scheme to radically change how we power our businesses and homes?
Click to expand...
This shows how ignorant Bolt is. Labor is proposing the NEG as a backstop on power. The NEG was coalition policy before coal lit a fuse that shunned Turnbull's ideas.
I can add more, but that's enough imho, to show how the Bolt's fail in a blue.
 
Bolt where do you start.............lets try money, get everyone angry then sign them up for the advertisers sound familiar?

Journalist? he may have been once long ago but really he is more entertainer than journalist like Jones etc.

Bolt is so predictable it is pointless to read his articles, absolutely bereft of intellect just read the comments they are hilarious.

Still he sucks money writing absolute crap got to be making a mill a year surely.
 
LIAR LIAR pants on fire ....

Bad day for the libs/ GOP !! they lied about costings. What tossers !! taking a leaf from their USA leaders the GOP .

"We were not asked to cost another party's policies and would not do so," the Treasury boss said in a response to a letter from Mr Bowen.

THE LIE

Mr Frydenberg said the costings showed Labor's tax plan would cost an extra $387 billion over the next decade, almost double previously estimated - a total Mr Gaetjens said his department had not provided.

AND ON AND ON THEY WENT,,, all of it a lie ...

Mr Bowen said Mr Gaetjens letter showed Mr Morrison and his treasurer had again been caught out lying about Labor.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/labors-387b-10-tax-grab-treasurer-140519353--spt.html

"This is a humiliating rebuke and confirms that Scott Morrison cannot be trusted on the economy," Mr Bowen said in a statement."

Ahhh derr ....


Here is how dear leader and future president of Australia does it !!




I do love the line ... I would never lie to you, almost like the Whitney/Dolly song, "I will always love you" !!
 
basilio said:
Just so we don't forget how the Liberal party destroyed Malcolm Turnbull and itself over energy policy.


How Malcolm Turnbull's Easter tweets help Bill Shorten's cause and Labor's campaign

Turnbull resurrects the NEG
The weekend standout, however, was the intervention of Malcolm Turnbull, who launched a series of pointed tweets about the National Energy Guarantee (NEG).
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04...ter-tweets-helped-the-labor-campaign/11034950
Click to expand...

Can you blame him ?
 
IFocus said:
Bolt where do you start.............lets try money, get everyone angry then sign them up for the advertisers sound familiar?

Journalist? he may have been once long ago but really he is more entertainer than journalist like Jones etc.

Bolt is so predictable it is pointless to read his articles, absolutely bereft of intellect just read the comments they are hilarious.

Still he sucks money writing absolute crap got to be making a mill a year surely.
Click to expand...
"No doubt you will post the evidence to back that claim." From another thread
 
moXJO said:
Wasn't the court case against a guy that was a corrupt ahole?
Click to expand...
I suppose some people might characterise Bolt like that.
" I have not been satisfied that the conduct [of Mr Bolt] is exempted from unlawfulness by s 18D. The reasons for that conclusion have to do with the manner in which the articles were written, including that they contained erroneous facts, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language and that as a result, the conduct of Mr Bolt and HWT is not justified in the manner required by s 18D of the RDA."
 
rederob said:
I suppose some people might characterise Bolt like that.
" I have not been satisfied that the conduct [of Mr Bolt] is exempted from unlawfulness by s 18D. The reasons for that conclusion have to do with the manner in which the articles were written, including that they contained erroneous facts, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language and that as a result, the conduct of Mr Bolt and HWT is not justified in the manner required by s 18D of the RDA."
Click to expand...
He is an opinion writer. Facts don't matter to the majority of them. Only cherry-picked data.
And thats left and right. That doesn't mean all of them are wrong 100% of the time.
But people credit them with more power than they actually have.
Bolts no threat....
 
moXJO said:
He is an opinion writer. Facts don't matter to the majority of them. Only cherry-picked data.
And that's left and right. That doesn't mean all of them are wrong 100% of the time.
Click to expand...
Opinions have the currency that their audience confers. However, opinions themselves cannot be judged in terms of right or wrong.
 
moXJO said:
He is an opinion writer. Facts don't matter to the majority of them. Only cherry-picked data.
And thats left and right. That doesn't mean all of them are wrong 100% of the time.
But people credit them with more power than they actually have.
Bolts no threat....
Click to expand...
Yep, the left loves to bag out Bolt for opinion, but the MSM in most cases is also opinion

Politics is subjective, mostly.
 
Top