skc
Goldmember
- Joined
- 12 August 2008
- Posts
- 8,277
- Reactions
- 329
When I run a check of my last years results I found although I have profited overall from both sides it seems like the long side of the trade has been much more profitable. Even when I check the stats since march where the market has moved sideways the long side seems to have doubled the short side in profits. Maybe there is something to be checked there?
Since Aug last year, the long leg was responsible for >90% of the total profits. That's understandable considering the overall market is up ~20% since that time.
What I don't know is whether the profit from those longs was due to the long leg diverging (i.e. falling) or the long leg playing catch up to the short leg that has spiked. If it's the first case then outright long may have been quite profitable, but if it's the second case, you'd be shorting the spike and generate very little profit.
Understood, thanks for the detailed answer
Remember my answer is far from definitive as I don't have the data to back up what I've said. Yet that's exactly how a trader needs to evolve and develop new strategies and approaches - by looking at the market with a curious mind, identifying potential edges and verifying them.