- Joined
- 12 January 2008
- Posts
- 7,324
- Reactions
- 18,266
Can't really help with back testing as it's not my expertise. However there are things and pitfalls to look out for such as splits, mergers, take overs, bankruptcies and de-listings that may or may not be included that could skew your results in your favor especially if any de-listed bankrupt companies are not included in the back test results. I have struggled to look up stocks that have been de-listed as google or any other searches are very limited and only shows up currently trading stocks or stocks that are gone more recently. A good resource I found to look up stocks that have lost all shareholder money due to going bankrupt is by searching on website:Yes thats what the strategy does. Buy at 20 week breakout and trail stop..
-Frank
You could try using a fundamental filter to narrow the range of stocks and see what results that gives with your system.Could you suggest basic filter I could use to find small caps growth using purely technicals? Other than volume and market cap there wouldn't really much else would there?
One of those systems is Techtrader--one of mine.Nick Radge's book Unholy Grails. He discusses many systems and shows the results.
Another source of information would be Nick Radge's book Unholy Grails. He discusses many systems and shows the results.
I'd suggest you look through @Skate "Dump it here" thread. Skate himself trades many mechanical systems based on lower priced ASX stocks that have started to move higher. He trades weekly charts. His portfolio holds anywhere between 20 - 40 stocks. He accumulates positions as the profits accumulate. The thread is a long read but skip through it until you come to his posts on all the systems he tested. You're bound to find lots of good ideas to test.
Great point that we forgot to touch on @AustwideOne problem in the lower end of the small caps is when they go and raise funds with a low share price offer.
Stop loss don't preserve capital when this occurs (usually) after market. ie price opens 20% lower.
To minimise this from happening, check out section, 8.2 I think of their latest financial statement showing how many quarters of funds are being held.
With mining companies I think it's great to see the people at the helm get the thing going right from the get-go. Even if it's a small operation, if they get it running and then fund further exploration / acquisitions etc from that it's a good sign.
I've seen great deposits go to waste and management sit on them for decades continuously taking the shareholders for goose chases and spruik them up each time to raise capital till they have a hole in their pocket.
Actually there is still another stock that has debut, that may benefit from those drinkers you mentioned...CCL was taken over i no longer profit from broken , drunken , ex gamblers
One rule I have with small caps is I only look at companies with an actual, real business that generates income.With small cap stocks it's easy to fall into the fund raising trap and end up losing so much of your hard earnt. Can I just say it bluntly on this forum: The Fcking directors on some of these small company stocks are pure marketers and they keep marketing the same pipe dream each time to raise funds and keep their pay packets going. Once they empty out the shareholder savings over many years, they'll move onto another small cap to do it all over again.
Glad to hear @Smurf1976 and I am pretty much in the same boat now, after falling to the magicians/marketers tricks in the past.One rule I have with small caps is I only look at companies with an actual, real business that generates income.
Not perfect but that does remove a lot of the silly ones.
Edit - Another one is run like hell from any company where the management seems more focused on marketing the company to shareholders than on running the actual business it's engaged in.
Doubly so if the nature of that marketing includes elaborate "stunts" of any kind which are superficially impressive but in practice represent no real achievement at all. Pretty much anyone could drive a standard car around Australia or set something on fire for example. Might seem superficially impressive but that's all it is, superficial and in much the same category as the tricks a magician uses on stage to distract the audience from how they're creating the illusion.
Why don’t you manually make up a universe to trade then load that in as your universe and
Then apply your technical parameters to it through whatever software.
Here's a trick question for you @Frankieplus. As an old school fisherman I'm endorsed by your system and need to investigate it more as it shows strong probability of finding that elusive stock with rage. I'm asking are you actually scanning your stock (throwing out the net) and bringing in hand fills or are you just throwing a drop line and picking the elite. i mean i can see a stock weekly and find probability in a stock but can't back-test hundred and pick an pedigree...
Hello @FrankieplusIdeally I would like to make up a universe selection by market cap. That way I can load it up to backtest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?