- Joined
- 6 November 2005
- Posts
- 915
- Reactions
- 0
Magdoran said:It is interesting that you take the time to
respond to a less cordial comment on Astrotrading, but my
more polite and respectful request for a dialogue is ignored
Hi Magdoran,
If you go back to the other thread you will find a post, where
a suggestion was made to to come to this thread, along with
a link ..... to avoid being accused of hijacking the other
thread ..... have been waiting for you to arrive .....
Magdoran said:What has happened to you Yogi? You seem bitter in your recent posts compared to your comments over the years. You gave the impression of being more balanced and jovial back then, albeit a bit of a zealot. Are you Ok? I just get the impression something is not right with your world recently judging by the barbs in your recent posts (some of which the moderators actually had to edit).
No problems here ... just not enough hours in a day ... !~!
Magdoran said:Now Moses (laughed my head off when I saw this, “Moses” talking to the “master” of the bible codes! Hahaha) is actually right about one thing, the onus is on the person making a claim, not the other way around, but perhaps this scientific method is “alien” to you?
Let's get this right ... every day of the week
our astrotrading targets are posted, for right or wrong .....
..... if people want to evaluate the results, they only have to
follow those posts, comparing the key dates to their FA/TA
and press releases.
That way, over a period of time, traders can evaluate for
themselves, whether this stuff works or not.
NO CLAIMS for accuracy have ever been made, though
many projected dates do come home with news/moves,
within +/- 1 day.
So what claims are you referring to, Magdoran???
Magdoran said:Certainly I belong to a different school of thought, but I have approached you with an open hand, and a willingness to converse. It is up to you how you would like to respond. But your current attitude I must admit does not inspire much confidence. I do think you have some method in your forecasting, but I suspect that it isn’t as great a “secret” or as powerful as you make it out to be. In fact, I’d say your behaviour seems quite defensive. Certainly not open, and the word “philanthropic” doesn’t seem come to mind either."
As previously indicated, Australian traders cannot buy the
astrotrading package and so they are not a target market
..... that means, the posts here presenting analysis on
Aussie stocks are definitely "philanthropic" by nature,
as there's no benefit to the poster, whatsoever ... !~!
Magdoran said:I just thought it would be interesting to compare notes, nothing more. Perhaps my questions have probed too deeply into the real basis of your methods – am I close? I think so. Ok, if you want to be a tortoise in his shell, and shy away from someone who is from a different school of Gann willing to have a genuine dialogue, so be it.
Sure, always open to any Gann-related dialogue here .....
Magdoran said:And yes, I am a skeptic when it comes to all things, I am a product of a science based education after all, and proud of it, and I will continue to investigate and seek plausible approaches and explanations. I just wanted to give you the chance to put your position out there in a constructive way...
Very generous of you ... so, where do you want to start ... ???
Magdoran said:By the way, Yogi, I do wish you well in your endevours.
Regards
Magdoran
have a great weekend
yogi
P.S. ..... that quip about the Bible codes, may well come back to haunt you ... lol