Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Astrostuff ... Gann from a different angle ...

You guys really should look at adding more moving averages to your charts.. :eek:

2hyfosh.png

Beamstas, you have this knack for making things so simple, like astroanalysis, simple stuff really.

Seriously, more MA's please.

TP, could you throw in some Gann MA's and S/R's to Beamstas graph? I am trying to trade it but not sure where to place my stop. At present I am looking at about 27 different possibilities, and I would like to narrow it down to just 16.

If you can help me get my stops down to just 16 possibilities, then I will do a dance for you TP. Just a few catches though. $6K for a 5 minute tease, another $6K for more of a tease, then the big $100 Kahunas to see my 'holy grail'

:bananasmi

ItsmeST
 
Beamstas, you have this knack for making things so simple, like astroanalysis, simple stuff really.

Seriously, more MA's please.

TP, could you throw in some Gann MA's and S/R's to Beamstas graph? I am trying to trade it but not sure where to place my stop. At present I am looking at about 27 different possibilities, and I would like to narrow it down to just 16.

If you can help me get my stops down to just 16 possibilities, then I will do a dance for you TP. Just a few catches though. $6K for a 5 minute tease, another $6K for more of a tease, then the big $100 Kahunas to see my 'holy grail'

:bananasmi

ItsmeST


Hope this narrows it down for you
This is all you are getting for free
If you want more then you better start paying!

2qu40p3.png

P.S They are actually moving average lines.. took a while!
 
Hope this narrows it down for you
This is all you are getting for free
If you want more then you better start paying!

Is this a long or short trade, when the price hits the sun is this stop or entry?

I may not understand Gann, but already I cant tell that I am going to have better results than I have had previously using Athena the star woman's horoscopes.
 
Hope this narrows it down for you
This is all you are getting for free
If you want more then you better start paying!

2qu40p3.png

P.S They are actually moving average lines.. took a while!

i think that's the way Tayser and the rainbow warriors trade........
 
This thread is amazing. I wish i had popcorn and some wine while reading this. I actually searched up who trader paul was after the reference in the thread.. i am thinking, this guy has to be a serious trader. crystal ball i hear.. haha! brilliant. i see that gann is actually really is here from a different angle! the angle where its all mirrors and the reflection is so bright that and you dont see f&*k all!
 
. i see that gann is actually really is here from a different angle! the angle where its all mirrors and the reflection is so bright that and you dont see f&*k all!

Ripper ! thanks for the laugh :)
 
It's funny as the years go on, you get a bunch of new guys coming in to question old threads (I did with the EW thread) and some even take the pi** out of it. Maybe make a thread like Waynes on EW, that was a good laugh, but I reckon keep it out of his thread with his own (and other astro) analysis.

Let Trader Paul do his thing.
 
It's funny as the years go on, you get a bunch of new guys coming in to question old threads (I did with the EW thread) and some even take the pi** out of it. Maybe make a thread like Waynes on EW, that was a good laugh, but I reckon keep it out of his thread with his own (and other astro) analysis.

Let Trader Paul do his thing.

Yea you are right. I am sorry. Although to be frank, after the first page, I failed to see all that much Gann discussed... But yea, good luck :)
 
Yea you are right. I am sorry. Although to be frank, after the first page, I failed to see all that much Gann discussed... But yea, good luck :)

Yeh, sorry, don't mean to be a nazi, but Trader Paul seems like a good bloke, his method of analysis and even application maybe vastly different from that espoused around here (application even as far as "let winners run, hard stop losses" etc), but there are extremelly consistent and profitable traders who don't practice any of this.

I'm sure Trader Paul has done years worth of this stuff, so if you don't understand it, then perhaps go and do the hours and then come back and have a discussion, or if you do understand it and don't believe in it, then don't practice it, but no need to keep on and on about it and rubbish their thread (not directed at anyone personally, just the general theme of which the thread has turned).

Just my thoughts.
 
It's funny as the years go on, you get a bunch of new guys coming in to question old threads (I did with the EW thread) and some even take the pi** out of it. Maybe make a thread like Waynes on EW, that was a good laugh, but I reckon keep it out of his thread with his own (and other astro) analysis.

Let Trader Paul do his thing.

Agreed to let him do his own thing, so long as we can see evidence of how he uses this to trade. It's a public forum that is up for public scrutiny. Until we he demonstrates how this astro stuff is used to trade, I would think it is acceptable that this method is scrutinized.
 
COH ..... some astroanalysis to the end of June 2009 .....

Was expecting some minor news earlier this week, but
it hasn't surfaced, as yet.

28-29042009 ..... minor and positive light on COH

04052009 ..... significant and positive cycle

11-12052009 ..... positive time cycle ... finance-related ???

2905-01062009 ..... minor and positive cycle, here.

12-16062009 ..... 2 minor time cycles come together - finances?

19-22062009 ..... minor and positive news expected here

29-30062009 ..... negative spotlight on COH

Call this analysis?

Always followed---Thats always--by self praise.

COH ..... up more than $3.oo, in the past four trading days and expect
the rally to continue, with another positive time cycle expected
Monday 04052009 .....

Now go look at the chart.
Reversed at resistance.
Pre school stuff.

Perhaps this rubbish is more to your liking

..... on the PRICE axis, the candlesticks do a great job of confirming our
astroanalysis on the TIME, previously posted on COH ..... 4 days of
positive price action and a v-bottom confirmed, since the entry to this trade.

From Friday's positive candle, closing near its highs and engulfing the doji of
the previous day, the price action is telling us to expect this rally to
continue, confirming our expectation of another positive time cycle,
due today ...

And YOU have to be joking!!!!

I'm sure Trader Paul has done years worth of this stuff, so if you don't understand it, then perhaps go and do the hours and then come back and have a discussion, or if you do understand it and don't believe in it, then don't practice it, but no need to keep on and on about it and rubbish their thread (not directed at anyone personally, just the general theme of which the thread has turned).

If I do a search of this guy and look up his copious posts just like this I would fill a whole board with examples just like the one above.

Dont understand it!!
Do the hours!!
You and I have more intellegence (I would have thought) than to pander to this crap!

Oh and notice he's disappeard!
 
the way i saw it here was ........

trader paul made many a claim , he was questioned and asked for proof....... the truth was a joke........... trader paul has not posted since........

happy to hear ANYONES analysis just happy now we know that its not actually used as real trading tool is all
 
Yeh, sorry, don't mean to be a nazi, but Trader Paul seems like a good bloke, his method of analysis and even application maybe vastly different from that espoused around here (application even as far as "let winners run, hard stop losses" etc), but there are extremelly consistent and profitable traders who don't practice any of this.

I'm sure Trader Paul has done years worth of this stuff, so if you don't understand it, then perhaps go and do the hours and then come back and have a discussion, or if you do understand it and don't believe in it, then don't practice it, but no need to keep on and on about it and rubbish their thread (not directed at anyone personally, just the general theme of which the thread has turned).

Just my thoughts.

Ha! I can't believe the word nazi is allowed by the forum.. I think the forum turned sour due to his use of at least 2 different people! I have nothing against the Gann mechanisms themselves. I do not use them for a simple reason. A line on a chart is a line. If the chart is changed from an algorithmic scale to a logarithmic scale the line still follows the market. The angle stays the same, and the use of the angle, over a longer period, does not track the market. Regardless, there are traders who use Gann to their advantage, and I know some (out of the very few traders that I have spoken to).

The criticism that I had towards the thread was the fact that after the first two pages of really interesting material (useless to trading or not) it just went way off topic, and the whole discussion of Gann techniques as a whole just went off. Maybe partly due to some questions raised about demo account use, or whatever.

In any case, I had my reasons for being critical. The reality is, I should not have said anything. My apologies to the forum :)
 
Public scrutiny and making a joke of it over and over again for pages are a different matter. This is where I think it has crossed the line. If you want the funny aspect, create a thread about it like WayneL did on EW.

I don't understand astro analysis one bit and don't care too, but how is it other astro guys understand and converse with Paul? I'm not a mod nor do I wish to be, but Tech I also remember you calling anyone trying to trade off DOM having no edge. Perhaps like you didn't understand DOM, you don't understand astro analysis. Just pointing out possibilities, then again perhaps you are fully upto date with astro analysis. I don't know. But if you aren't getting any answers and are asking legitimate, informed questions, then why keep flogging a dead horse?

Anyways, I'm out of this thread, I've made my point, mocking is different to questioning, and questioning is different to flogging a dead horse. Make any sense? Probably not.
 
but Tech I also remember you calling anyone trying to trade off DOM having no edge. Perhaps like you didn't understand DOM,

Rubbish.
I said and still do say its NOT how I wish to trade.
I dont want to be in front of a computer punching in trades like a boxer on ICE.
Not for me.
 
Top