- Joined
- 27 June 2010
- Posts
- 4,202
- Reactions
- 328
ASH listed in Aug 2014 at $1.66 and quickly saw a high of $1.94, cut to 11 months later and the stock is trading at 53c, quite a decline considering that financial results so far have been only a little (30% approx) under prospectus forecasts.
ASH has more cash than debt, revenues of at least 250m, lots of historic growth and vertical integration. Top 20 hold over 90% with the Shrimpton Family holding about half of that...looks cheap.
~
I think half the decline is due to missing the prospectus forecast, while the other half is due to de-rating on the back of the VET debacle. Equity markets is all but closed to these training providers. If they can't grow by acquisition they are worth a lot less in terms of earnings multiple.
It remains to be seen whether they can achieve their current forecast yet. They should report soon next month and if they do achieve the figures (and pay the 4.1c dividend) then they'd receive some re-rating you'd think.
ASH listed in Aug 2014 at $1.66 and quickly saw a high of $1.94, cut to 11 months later and the stock is trading at 53c, quite a decline considering that financial results so far have been only a little (30% approx) under prospectus forecasts.
ASH has more cash than debt, revenues of at least 250m, lots of historic growth and vertical integration. Top 20 hold over 90% with the Shrimpton Family holding about half of that...looks cheap.
~
FWIW, these guys strike me as being a bit opaque and have plenty of spin in their presentations. The guidance is not exactly clear to someone having a brief look. I didn't plan to spend long on it, but ended up going round in circles to figure it out.Getting a whole lot cheaper... down to 31.5c today on the back of a "at least" 10% cut in guidance for FY16... 4 months into the year and less than 2 months after the FY15 report.
FY15 NPATA was $14.8m. So even if the haircut was 20% it'd still be ~$11-12m. Compare that with a market cap of $47m... cash of $6m ($12.5m in report less $6m dividend paid) and no drawn debt.
FWIW, these guys strike me as being a bit opaque and have plenty of spin in their presentations. The guidance is not exactly clear to someone having a brief look. I didn't plan to spend long on it, but ended up going round in circles to figure it out.
On 5 October 2015 they say the NPATA will be at least 10% lower than previous guidance. The old "you better go find it" tactic, with the investor thinking "I better go through all the announcements in case they've hidden it somewhere."
Nothing in the Annual Report on 30 Sept 2015. Announcement on 28 August 2015 says the guidance is the same as that released with the results on 19 August 2015.
On 19 August 2015 their guidance is that they expect FY16 NPATA to be in line with the Proforma FY15 result.
So what's the 2015 Pro-forma result?? Well, it isn't specifically mentioned to my eyes.
Plenty of mention of Proforma EBITDA (which was $20.7 million).
Statutory NPATA was $14.8 million.
Page 2 of the announcement on 19 August 2015 entitled "2015 result, final dividend, outlook & investor call" says that Proforma ROE (calculated as NPATA / Equity) was 13.3%.
Equity was $102.876m on 30 June 2015. Therefore Proforma NPATA must be $13.7m (102.876 x 13.3%).
So latest guidance is that 2016FY NPATA will be at least 10% less than 2015FY, which is $12.33m.
Surely it's not that hard to clearly communicate that figure. And when a company doesn't it makes you wonder.
DIVIDEND TYPE | DIVIDEND AMOUNT ($) | FRANKED | EX-DIV DATE | PAY DATE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final | 0.024 | 100.00% | 01/09/2021 | 17/09/2021 |
Interim | 0.018 | 100.00% | 02/03/2021 | 18/03/2021 |
Final | 0.027 | 100.00% | 01/09/2020 | 11/09/2020 |
Final | 0.027 | 100.00% | 27/08/2019 | 06/09/2019 |
Final | 0.025 | 100.00% | 02/08/2018 | 17/08/2018 |
Final | 0.041 | 100.00% | 02/09/2015 | 25/09/2015 |
Interim | 0.023 | 100.00% | 04/03/2015 | 27/03/2015 |
saw the ann. but couldn't copy/paste it , and missed the bottom to boot so wasn't tempted to add moreWas trying to make my mind up about an entry today. Was down over 30% at one point @ 0.36 but reversed super fast before I could fully scope it out. I was guessing a loss of $1 npat from a large contract lost to one of its segments as well as a one-off write-down of say $4m good-wiil at worst but maybe less. So reduction of say $5m npat fy24 cf fy23 of $11m and a ROE of 32%. Assuming other earnings are similar, might be looking at a ROE of ~15% on a fy23 book value of 0.23.
Also though, overshadowing this business is Albanese government acting against casual labour hire contractors.
Not Held
View attachment 164991
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?