"Then to discover that, not only had this happened, but that the call had been pre-recorded and the decision to transmit approved by your station's management, was truly appalling."
http://www.news.com.au/world/radio-...y-to-face-public/story-fndir2ev-1226533223652Amber Petty, a 2DayFM breakfast presenter for more than four years, said humiliating stunts were "very much a part of the culture" at the station.
"It's not all commercial radio, it's that company (2DayFM)," she said.
"They just want you to be talked about - they don't care whether it's good or bad."
Another former Austereo breakfast presenter said she was encouraged by her then program director to make listeners cry and would be paid $50 when she did.
She said prank calls had long been part of the fabric of commercial radio.
The more I think about it, it's not the presenters who are to blame, the prank was pre recorded and it was up to management to ok it's airing which they did.
People in charge of the station were responsible for this going to air.
Toxic is the only word to describe the culture at that place and the management should go along with that grub Sandilands, I doubt the 2 presenters who did this would ever go on air again, this will follow them for the rest of their careers.
On the point of illegality, isnt there a law somewhere that says it's illegal to impersonate ?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120303131144AAInuhZ
I agree with P Fitzsimons opinion
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/a-tragedy-but-who-is-at-fault-20121208-2b29q.html
As a student of human nature I find it very difficult to believe that the poor woman was not bullied/ridiculed by her boss despite whatever PR they put out after the event. Just look at his body language during interviews.
Does anybody really think she would have committed suicide if she had proper support from her employers/workmates?
I thought there was a law that they werent allowed to replay anything on radio, unless they ask you first, has to be with your permission, I could be wrong.
The Peter FitzSimons article is a pretty good analysis I think.
As to whether she was bullied at work, I didn't get that impression myself but it's of course a possibility. It's also possible the nurse may have had personal issues that we are not aware of. The other nurse involved has not taken a similar course of action so to say the prank phone call resulted in this woman's death is taking things way too far IMO.
On the point of illegality, isnt there a law somewhere that says it's illegal to impersonate ?
5 Prohibition on use of listening devices
(1) A person shall not use, or cause to be used, a listening device:
(a) to record or listen to a private conversation to which the person is not a party, or
(b) to record a private conversation to which the person is a party.
...
listening device means any instrument, apparatus, equipment or device capable of being used to record or listen to a private conversation simultaneously with its taking place.
alright. Different slant on an old topic.
Here is proof I do have friends who are Royalists ... and we respect our different opinions
A really clever collage of morphing pictures has been posted here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=E8nJhG1xE5o
Enjoy watching.
IMO it's unlikely that the nurse concerned ended her life due solely to the hoax call, but it certainly seems to have been a contributing factor.
Hi pixel,... Enjoy watching.
+1
Highly unlikely (but still probable), that this person DID NOT ended her life because of this one incident.
**TYPO**
Added *DID NOT*
Sounded right the first time. Your correction changes it to what you didn't mean to say, although I would change "probable" to "possible".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?