- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
Was driving the kids to school way back when and some cow came on the radio with a filthy joke, I almost ran off the road trying the switch her off.
That woman would have felt humiliated globally and just couldn't handle it.
The juvenile idiots who caused her death have now scurried away to hide somewhere.
Nurse duped in Kate Middleton prank found dead
It was a harmless prank. Fallacious reasoning;
post hoc ergo propter hoc
It was a harmless prank. Fallacious reasoning;
post hoc ergo propter hoc
Coles and Telstra have pulled advertising from Sydney radio station 2Day FM after the nurse who answered a royal prank call by the station's presenters was found dead.
British media turns on Kyle Sandilands after 2Day FM royal radio prank
Australia radio station which staged pregnant Kate phone prank forced girl to confess to her mother she was raped when she was 12
Radio network Austereo has reportedly suspended all advertising on 2Day FM amid a fierce backlash over a prank phone call made to a London hospital, and the death of the nurse who answered it.
I hope more follow, it's not just this but Sandilands is a creep and was let off easily for his last "funny" stunt.
I know this was unintended but someone's dead as a result of it, no escaping that.
Not as a result of the prank, but rather as a result of the irrational hype and pretense that one little peanut, one particular woman's womb and resulting nausea, should deserve more attention, yet at the same time, privacy, than any other. Why is it that family and fans of an otherwise healthy, although somewhat anorexic-looking, woman relish the attention in news and pictures when it suits them, yet incite outrage at the thought of somebody trying to do something slightly different.
As I said before, this death is tragic, but IMHO a result of people's obsession with royalty and the resulting double standard of who is allowed to publish what and in which context.
Not as a result of the prank, but rather as a result of the irrational hype and pretense that one little peanut, one particular woman's womb and resulting nausea, should deserve more attention, yet at the same time, privacy, than any other. Why is it that family and fans of an otherwise healthy, although somewhat anorexic-looking, woman relish the attention in news and pictures when it suits them, yet incite outrage at the thought of somebody trying to do something slightly different.
As I said before, this death is tragic, but IMHO a result of people's obsession with royalty and the resulting double standard of who is allowed to publish what and in which context.
Not as a result of the prank, but rather as a result of the irrational hype and pretense that one little peanut, one particular woman's womb and resulting nausea, should deserve more attention, yet at the same time, privacy, than any other. Why is it that family and fans of an otherwise healthy, although somewhat anorexic-looking, woman relish the attention in news and pictures when it suits them, yet incite outrage at the thought of somebody trying to do something slightly different.
As I said before, this death is tragic, but IMHO a result of people's obsession with royalty and the resulting double standard of who is allowed to publish what and in which context.
Or maybe simply as a result of someone being in a fragile state of mental health.
(I do agree there was too much hype about the preganancy though)
I think that's quite unfair as far as the royal family is concerned. They are who they are. I've never had the impression that they invite or desire all the attention paid to them. On the contrary, it must be hell on earth living under the constant media spotlight.Why is it that family and fans of an otherwise healthy, although somewhat anorexic-looking, woman relish the attention in news and pictures when it suits them, yet incite outrage at the thought of somebody trying to do something slightly different.
Finally, someone gets to what should be the main focus of respoonsibility.I agree that the radio prank isn't funny but is that the real issue here?
We have someone answering phones at a hospital where a member of the Royal family is being treated.
I'd have thought that fact in itself would warrant a significant level of security.If it hadn't been this prank then it could easily have been something else. The risk of a security breach is ever present in situations like this.
Either the management didn't have proper procedures in place or they weren't followed. The radio station prank resulted in those security holes being identified and proven, but didn't cause them in the first place.
Southern Cross Austereo chief executive Rhys Holleran came out to say they havent done anything illegal, he completely misses the point and should be brought to account.
Closing down some of these rubbishy FM stations would be a good start.
[video]http://video.heraldsun.com.au/2313867921/2DayFM-confident-no-laws-were-broken[/video]
RADIO presenters Mel Greig and Michael Christian were receiving medical assistance last night amid growing fears for their "physical and emotional wellbeing".
The 2DayFM duo, described as "deeply shattered", went to ground to escape the outrage over the suicide of the nurse who answered their hoax call, Jacintha Saldanha.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?