Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

****ASF Breaking News****

Jump to new
Miner said:
The killer in Melbourne should have held alive even half dead, so that police could have extracted inside information about who sent him and why? It is unthinkable that anyone alone would have acted on such crime. There is always a mastermind.
Oh yes, no one says how could be all terrorists worldwide appear to be coming from one religion
Click to expand...

That is a lot of information for that policeman to mull through in that split second that the attacker was lunging at his colleague. Perhaps he could have, in that same split second, tried to ascertain whether he was a terrorist or just a madman, whether he was Christian or Muslim and whether a bullet to the leg that would for certain not have killed him might have gone through some soft tissue and ricochet into some innocent passerby that was in the crowd behind. I think a bullet to the chest was the right decision.
 
sptrawler said:
I guess the other side of the coin is, the prisons are full of people, who have killed and still say nothing.
Most will be out in 10 to 15 years.
Just another angle on it, not saying it is right or wrong.
What if there was no mastermind and two police personel were killed trying to capture him, what if one was your partner or your child?
Click to expand...
Sptrawler
I hear your point and understood.
But remember I have been referring also incidences from 1964 (JFK) , 1984 (Indira Gandhi) - both the cases the assassins were killed and the mystery of motives remained unknown.
When people are dealing with criminals, then there are many attributes with those specialists - calmness is one key. They are not like civilians and emotions are last to be considered. By not capturing them even in half dead (please mind the word and I am not saying unhurt) those people have potentially deprived many others to see justices are done by not sparing the people behind them. I would be childish to suggest that there were no masterminds. it is like drug peddlers - there are always people behind with motive, money and machinery behind.
I do believe if Australia has no death penalty that is for a reason but that does not stop us to interrogate the criminals to save thousands of innocents and capturing the people behind.
I also have referred why one particular religion always gets involved.
Have a good night.
 
bellenuit said:
That is a lot of information for that policeman to mull through in that split second that the attacker was lunging at his colleague. Perhaps he could have, in that same split second, tried to ascertain whether he was a terrorist or just a madman, whether he was Christian or Muslim and whether a bullet to the leg that would for certain not have killed him might have gone through some soft tissue and ricochet into some innocent passerby that was in the crowd behind. I think a bullet to the chest was the right decision.
Click to expand...


Police gotta aim for centre body mass with adrenalin and movement etc right @explod
 
I like the idea of a prison in the Simpson desert for these b@stards. Just shove them in there and don't ever let them out. No visits, no Korans just an empty landscape to look at for the rest of their lives.

Unless they fess up and dob in their handlers in which case they might get out in 20 years.
 
Sick twisted radicalised
Start stabbing shooting
people no hesitation.

No taser, talking , BANG.

If you make any extremest
Watchlist your DEPORTED.

No ifs ,rehabilitation , GONE.
 
I was a bit surprised the officers took so long to shoot with a couple of people stabbed already and the attacker being so big not much choice but to shoot at the chest area as trained.

In that sort of situation tasers are a 50/50 chance of missing (as told by a copper who had deployed them a few times)

Heart goes out to the police officer taking a life no matter the circumstance is very heavy hope he has plenty of support.
 
He did a good act. Now he can do another one.

Donate his GoFund money to the victims of his previous crimes.
 
SirRumpole said:
So he's a petty thief, but he still did a good act.

I wonder how he ended up on skid row, another victim of technological change perhaps.
Click to expand...
Yes it will be interesting, to see if he can turn his life around, the donations are a good chunk of money.
I'm sure all that is needed, is a start for some of these people.
I can't understand why the local Governments, don't start up a community help centres, something like men's shed. Where these people can go to learn some basic skills, and gain some confidence.
They have to try something, because the problem is going to grow. IMO
 
Well he sold his popularity with that act of thuggery. He won't get much sympathy from Melbournians that are sick of crime, violence and the erosion of our freedoms as a result.
Maybe his trolley act was a demarcation dispute with a terrorist on his turf.
 
basilio said:
This is how the world looks when one can just recreate reality with...

A 69-year-old man says he identifies as a 49-year-old and wants his age legally changed so he can meet more women on Tinder

Kelly McLaughlin
Nov 8, 2018, 6:53 AM

YouTube/Omroep GelderlandEmile Ratelband.
  • Emile Ratelband filed a lawsuit against the Dutch government in an attempt to change the birth date on his passport.
  • He wants to change his birthday from March 11, 1949, to March 11, 1969, which would make his official age 20 years younger than his actual age, 69.
  • A court in Arnhem, in the eastern Dutch province of Gelderland, is expected to deliver its decision on Ratelband’s age within four weeks.
A 69-year-old entrepreneur in the Netherlands wants to legally change his age to 49 so he can go back to work and meet more women on Tinder, according to his lawsuit.

Emile Ratelband filed a lawsuit against the Dutch government in an attempt to change the birth date on his passport from March 11, 1949, to March 11, 1969, the Dutch publication De Telegraaf reported.

The self-proclaimed positivity guru argued that he feels 20 years younger, and compared the age difference to being transgender, despite the concepts being completely different.

“You can change your name. You can change your gender. Why not your age? Nowhere are you so discriminated against as with your age,” he told De Telegraaf.

Ratelband argued that he is a “young god” and said changing his age would allow him to “live differently,” saying he would get more matches on Tinder if he could use a younger age.

Ratelband also argued in court that he feels discriminated against because of his older age, according to RLE Nieuws. The Netherlands’ constitution “prohibits direct and indirect distinction in employment relations on the basis of age,” but some claim that people over 50 have been the most impacted by austerity measures in the country.

He said he fears companies won’t hire him and that employees will look at him differently.

“When I’m 69, I am limited. If I’m 49, then I can buy a new house, drive a different car. I can take up more work. When I’m on Tinder and it says I’m 69, I don’t get an answer,” he said
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/...wants-to-legally-change-his-age-to-49-2018-11
Click to expand...

The give away is usually a persons neck. The neck ages and is difficult to disguise and why actresses in the distant past adorned scarves. One well known died due to her scarf being trapped in a car wheel.

Some famous people aged 49:
]
NbwcMN4ckvGp5qPz1w_d1XN-EFo7Qo_uFvQu-lnlO5ktkuMMuA.jpg
I6LEhA-QBN6W-_F1arTGpbY8vMyvPjC5_czAsDHDizt3gyqpWw.jpg
RzamIYDvcNmqVrs1hu3KyFzaF1y5RcKzxU59vRVCehvNJvK8F1.jpg
black-white-lowland-gorilla.jpg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-28_0-44-2.jpeg
    upload_2018-12-28_0-44-2.jpeg
    5 KB · Views: 34

Similar threads

Glen48
Life in the USA
Replies
4
Views
4K
Monkey C Doo
M
R
IRAQ: the Big (neo) Con
Replies
1
Views
5K
basilio
basilio
Top