- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,638
- Reactions
- 24,526
More to the point, how the hell does a person who takes the pizz out of people because they don't ban guns, then go off and make movies involving guns.Why didn't he just have them sacked ?
Seriously, how the hell does a prop gun fire bullets ?
Haven't read the story yet, but there will be all sorts of theories.Don't know the circumstances here, but blanks can kill at close range.
But does seem more likely that these were live rounds.
They were 'shooting' a Western. Pretty much goes with the territory.Haven't read the story yet, but there will be all sorts of theories.
To me, why do movies and video games etc, have to involve so much violence?
Like I grew up with violence, being a pommie kid in mining towns in the 60's and 70's and having an off the scale violent father.
But I don't chase violence and I avoid it wherever I can, nowadays it seems as though the narrative is to be accepting and tolerant, but the reality is violence reinforcing through the media and online is off the scale.
It is a strange world IMO, is there any wonder that mental health issues are through the roof? we tell kids to be caring and understanding, then send them to their rooms to get on the computer and run over people for points, and beat the bejeezuz out of people in video games.
Weird IMO.
Heaps of ways it can go wrong, but I seriously doubt it was live ammo.
The above explains how.It is now being reported that a single shot passed through the cinematographer, causing fatal wounds, and then entered the director's clavicle, causing critical wounds. How could something that caused all that damage to two people be anything other than a live round?
Eyewitnesses are also reporting that Baldwin shouted immediately after the incident, "Why was I handed a hot gun?"
It is looking more and more like a real bullet.
Maybe he read the Victorian legislation and realised it isn't as good a job as first thought, isn't the CHO in Vic pandemic responsibilities being replaced by the premier and minister for health? Thereby leaving a possibility that the job, just becomes the fall guy for the minister?Not that fresh news..has some9ne got a conscience and ethics suddenly?
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/na...-role-days-from-starting-20211028-p59424.html
The new pandemic-specific laws, which will replace state-of-emergency powers when they expire on December 15, curtail the chief health officer’s powers, giving the premier authority to declare a pandemic and the health minister the role of making public health orders.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?