MovingAverage
Just a retail hack
- Joined
- 23 January 2010
- Posts
- 1,315
- Reactions
- 2,565
I view IMF differently from all the listed law firms. While IMF plays in the legal space its biz model is very different. IMF is not a provider of professional legal services—like the IPHs etc. IMF bank rolls big ticket litigation (mainly class actions) and in return takes a slice of the damages payouts. IMF doesn’t run the litigation but it does pay the lawyers fees.i am WATCHING ( not buying ) QIP currently the share price is above my target ( ditto for SHJ )
previously i held XIP ( taken over by IPH ) and yes i made a profit on that in the past i held IMG ( and their hybrid note ) ( IMF has since 'rebranded ' ) and left with modest profits there
i also held SGH where the outcome was nothing close to break-even ( in a bad way )
these companies involve themselves in legal cases , and sometimes these cases go for years ( decades ) so you must take forecasts with a bag of salt .
now sure the IP looks like a commercial tax ( or insurance policy ) ,regular yearly income from the client but it is those few litigations that can be a gorilla with a wrench ( tying up time and resources )
DYOR ( very carefully in this area )
now if we are talking about fund managers/analysts and their support for different investment areas , maybe a deep dive into the research is still necessary , before you part with your cash
i would suggest IF you buy into this sector you watch it closely AND be ready to jump if necessary ( SGH for one proved they had no ability to do due diligence , nor auditing capability )