- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
Actually, it makes little difference if they come here legally or not. If like 90% of illegal arrivals they arrive by plane nobody bats an eyelid. It is the politicised nature of arrivals by boat that the opposition has successfully used time & time again as a political weapon.Dveous, your post has hit the nail on the head, I think when Krudd finds out what 99% of the voters think of the boat people he will do a complete back flip . Yes we can take refugees, but they ONLY come past all the proper channels.
Every interview with a prospective asylum seeker in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, etc that has been released since the crackdown has noted one consistency - the new position provides no deterrant. Only stopping the larger operators on Indon soil will reduce the numbers.
Happy you of course do realise that something like 97% of refuges that come to Australia arrive legitimately...and you also realise that many of them are traumatised and have lost family and are uneducated and don't speak English.
You do realise that...right?
I'm sure that the majoerity of Australians care about human beings, howver they are not impressed by greedy queue jumping economic refugees, who just want to leech on our social security system, bring in countless relatives on the family reunion programme who also leech our system, it's time to stop this and if it means going back to the pacific solution, then lets get started, once these people get wind of it happening, they will stop trying, and hey it just hit me, while the previous pacific solution was in place, how deafening were the press reports of the people of these places, being slaughtered? persecuted and treated inhumanely? hmmm? I cant remeber one instance, if we would be so bad to refuse entry, then wouldnt we just be joining all those other countries who do the same? how many are taken in in Japan? north Korea? alaska? iceland? russia?china? oh hang on we never hear about boat people trying to get in there, whynot? climate not good? politics no good? welfare no good? lifestylr no good? time to look at what works, has worked in the past and will solve this crisis and yes, it is a crisis,
...While we have homeless Australians, many because they can't get proper treatment for their mental illness...
Pretty easy for us to sit in our comfortable homes and pass judgement, I guess....
Crisis??LOL
"leech on our social security system"Evidence please and no, don't try to source from TT or ACA. Credible evidence thanks..
At the same time, I just can't begin to imagine how distorted my thinking and moral sense would become if my homeland had been torn up by bombs and suicide bombers, my family killed or tortured, and any sense of security I'd briefly had completely destroyed.
Pretty easy for us to sit in our comfortable homes and pass judgement, I guess.
so tt and aca are just liars? they have absolutely no creditability?
They're still all applying for the same temporary exemption Visas!Mofra, I don't know how many times you need to be told, but the people who arrive by plane are not illegals entrants. They have visas. Those who overstay their visas are here illegally.
"Because [boat] people arrive without a valid visa it's easier for them to be portrayed as somehow doing something wrong," former Democrats leader Andrew Bartlett, now a research fellow at ANU, said.
"You could just as easily say that people who come here on a tourist or student visa with the intention of claiming asylum once they get here, while still legitimate, are claiming a visa partly under false pretences."
The proportion of asylum seekers who are granted asylum (the cream of the crop in many cases) tend to pay more than $80,000 over their tax-lifetime once granted asylum.The blame for not rounding these people up and sending them back rests squarely with the lax enforcement of our immigration laws by the Rudd bureaucracy. It costs $80,000 to process each illegal on Xmas island. I am sure they could nab each overstayer for a fraction of that... especially if they paid a bounty on each dobbed in.
Julia, well summed up. I don't like the idea of my tax dollars being used for detention as there are certainly a mix of unsavoury characters amongst those seeking asylum, however hearing the voices in interviews there are many people amongst the seekers who have a greater work ethic than the average Australian and are likely to repay the investment in processing with ongoign tax dollars in spades.While we have homeless Australians, many because they can't get proper treatment for their mental illness, I'm damned if I want to see my tax dollars building a gym for detainees.
At the same time, I just can't begin to imagine how distorted my thinking and moral sense would become if my homeland had been torn up by bombs and suicide bombers, my family killed or tortured, and any sense of security I'd briefly had completely destroyed.
Pretty easy for us to sit in our comfortable homes and pass judgement, I guess.
Nobody ever went broke by underestimating the publicAre there people too stupid to realise this? Surely not. Everyone realises they're comedy shows, not any form of news or informative progam, don't they?
It's amazing how people get so emotive about the method of arrival. Asylum seekers are asylum seekers.
Interesting that the "dark skinned" bludger/gov. benefits seeker myth still gets exposed by people who have no experience with the issue.
Less than 10% of assylum seekers come by boat and I think the brits are the country which have the most people living off our tax payers money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?