- Joined
- 20 May 2011
- Posts
- 1,544
- Reactions
- 1
I've issued a challenge to you. I can get you the data. And I can get you into the firm that will back you.
If you can produce the profitable algo on ASX market.
I have issued a challenge to you. Your challenge is to walk in a straight line for one minute. Also you are locked in a 1x1 metre cube. Good luck.
But of course you cannot even show that you have placed a few trades.
What few trades? What the **** are you even talking about? Do you have multiple personality disorder? Can I remind you that we are talking about what one can do if one has a server colocated at the ASX building and is has 300 microsecond access to the ASX. Are you going to give me said colocation?
Simple yes or no will be fine.
Hardly. I know what they do.
Given I have provided a multitude of links which disprove what you said, I would beg to differ.
That is not what Alan Kohler's article was about. It was about HFT robbing super funds and retail out of their profit. With the flash orders and dodgy quotes And you swallowed it. Hook line and sinker!!
I did not even read the article, as it's contents is irrelevant to me - as I am already well enough familiar with HFTing. How stupid do you look now?
Now I've asked about 8 times can you stand by this above statement? If so can you give me more detail because the market simply doesn't function like that. if we cannot clear up the above BS then I'm wasting my time talk to some who doesn't trade.
What detail do you need? HFTers move the sp, if someone makes an order before they do, the result they will get after they do it will be different to the one they expected, and can cause them to lose money (which does not imply their trade is not profitable, merely less profitable than otherwise) as a result of HFTing actions. This is pretty easy to understand.