Whatever method you use, their share of the deposit was only 8 million pounds. Needs to prove up more ore
No kidding. And the $14m drilling program will do just that. If you just base a valuation on JORC without allowing for probability of extension of resource you are 2 steps behind the market because someone is already doing that. Of course there are no certainties, but you play the probabilities, which in this case are very high.
I'll tell you where I see the risk - not in the resource, in my opinion it will be very big and highly economic. I believe the current JORC has only scratched the surface. I think the risk lies in the fact Heathgate controls 75% and they control the agenda, do they want to mine as soon as possible, are are they happy to sit on this a while, if they hold the view the Uranium price is going to go higher and higher over time? What I mean is, there is a chance that Heathgate and AGS' interests do not align. They should align, but who knows what a private company is thinking?
As for the resource itself, I think that will be proven up and will more than justify the current capitalisation and then some.