This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Aboriginal Rock Art One of the Worlds Great Wonders

IFocus

You are arguing with a Galah
Joined
8 September 2006
Posts
7,669
Reactions
4,759
OK has the grand title will add some content when I get a chance starting with WA Kimberley rock art renowned through out the world yet mostly unknown in Australia.

I'll cover the research since white exploration through to present day,

if anyone else has seen or has some thing to add please do.
 
A basic search for Kimberley rock art research papers (https://www.researchgate.net/search/publication?q=Histories+of+rock+art+research+in+Western+Australia’s+Kimberley,+1838–2000) will reveal an extensive amount of research over a long period of time in this area. This area for ancient rock art is renown world wide so much so Germans were in the Kimberley's pre WWII researching the art.

A paper worth reading is "Histories of rock art research in Western Australia’s Kimberley, 1838–2000" looks at studies done over that period starting colonial through to modern day.
 
Starting with the most controversial or misunderstood rock art the Gwion Gwion or Bradshaw Rock art.

Bradshaw was a pastoralist that recorded Gwion Gwion art, Gwion Gwion name comes from the bird that bled from the beak and created the images.

The images are the earliest of any rock art world wide showing human form.

The images are extortionary perfect in proportion with no errors or mistakes.

There are a number of forms of Gwion Gwion art.

The art is in an ark around the Kimberley's with some of the best galleries coastal (keep that thought)

Because of this many claims were made that it could not have be Aboriginal art and according to "amateur anthropologist Walsh this art was made by people of a non-Aboriginal culture – most likely Asiatic in origin"

It has been dated out to 17,000 years but is expected to be much older.
 

Attachments

  • 1736597974473.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 16
  • 1736598108027.png
    562.3 KB · Views: 13
The Gwion Gwion art seems to appear out of nowhere almost as if there was a school some where teaching the same forms of art which gave many negative views of it not being Aboriginal (read the paper "Histories of rock art research in Western Australia’s Kimberley, 1838–2000" )
 
This thread struck a chord with me, because when I was a kid my parents moved to Dampier, in the early days of the resources era, before Karratha, Wickham etc.
So I thought why not google aboriginal rock art near Dampier, because as kids we foun a lot when we went camping in the 1960's, on google maps the highlighted places weren't where we found them.
 
I skim read the Wikipedia article. I give you credit for at least the mentioning the controversy around the origin of the Gwion Gwion rock paintings - the people depicted, and their attire, do not look Aboriginal. Combined with the fact such realistic depictions of the human form are otherwise basically unheard of in pre-colonial Australian art, its origin IS unclear. Half the article is about the uncertain origins, and it's there for anyone to see the evidence in greater depth, unless Mr Focus goes in and wrecks it lol.
 


There's answers for all your points and more stuff that all Australians should know, will also address the dot painting controversy (which isn't) as well.
 
I stayed at El Questro about 10 years ago and roamed about the area off road on a motorbike. I found quite an amount of rock art which didn't seem to have been on any tourist maps and was quite isolated from any white fellas structures such as bores and buildings.

So it is there but being mapped unfortunately more and more.

gg
 

If anyone bothered to read the research?

Grahame Walsh ran the theory that Gwion Gwion art wasn't Aboriginal in line with early explorers, colonist's and squatters (pastoralists)

Reasons for this logic (other than racism)

Often some local Aboriginal's didn't relate to the art and reports of some Aboriginal's calling it rubbish, some research disputes the translation. However some local oral history relates the art to the Gwion Gwion bird who created to art by drawing the images from its bleeding beak. Remembering the art is dated out to 17,000 years every chance some thing got lost along the way.

Gwion Gwion art seems to have appeared out of no where.
It simply didn't at the time before the current art was drawn (last ice age) sea levels would have been lower and the progression to todays images will be under water. Some of the best galleries are coastal.

Time lines dated when Grahame Walsh was alive appeared to show a gap between the ending of Gwion Gwion art and the start of Wandjina rock art @4,000 years. Wandjina rock art is part of local Kimberleys current population oral history.
Its now been established through more advanced dating technics the two art style over lap in time lines.

As to the images dress, clothing, bags, tassels and hair styles not being Aboriginal early photos of Aboriginal show all of this. In the Kimberly the hair styles were common, clothing, bags, tassels were used through out central Australia also common.
Medical practitioner Dr David M Welch has published a series re Australian Aboriginal Culture, the "Aboriginal Paintings of the Kimberly Region Wester Australia" shows photos clearly demonstrating that there is in fact a direct connection to the figures in the art.

Its unusual the earlier proponent's of it being non Aboriginal didn't also make the connection.

Wandjina rock art below I think this is the gallery at Elisabeth Station on the Gib River Road note there are no mouths, the Wandjina rock art is often touched up as a part of tradition some galleries have over 40 coats of ochre over the millenniums.



 
Last edited:
Another Gwion Gwion gallery note only the red ochre remains due to the binding agent used at the time (unknown) also a lot of the sites are remote from ochre deposits its unbelievably stunning, more so that Aboriginals created this art so long ago not only the art but the tools to create.

 
I was asked about racism in reference to Aboriginal art which is often thrown up as click bait usually from overseas FB users.

Often the same content which drags in the usual suspects (Australians).

This behavior only ever comes up on Aboriginal art never any other.

The link below is typical, images then talking about Gwion Gwion art work (there isn't any shown) and a fake looking Wandjina.

Also note the referances to dot painting I will talk about later.

https://www.facebook.com/
 
There's answers for all your points and more stuff that all Australians should know, will also address the dot painting controversy (which isn't) as well.
like how there isnt any known dot paintings done pre 1970s, its hardly found on any rocks or any other place
except champagne socialists arts display tying to hyjack & exploit aboriginal culture to mae a quick buck like othe rfakes like the bruce pascoe
 


There was, will get to it soon.
 
In 1971 Geoffrey Bardon encouraged Aboriginal people in Papunya community to paint the community school walls biased on their oral history after which he got them to paint on cardboard and canvas.

Due to cultural concerns they changed their style to dots.

Better explanation here and more here.

"In 1974 other aboriginal groups saw Papunya paintings for sale in Perth and Alice Springs. They were upset and angry about the paintings They felt the designs on the paintings revealed secret and sacred knowledge.

To overcome objections from these other aboriginal groups the Papunya artists obscured the sacred designs with dots. Aboriginal dot art was born."


Given all this is easily found on the web I cringe when it is regularly stated on the web Barton taught the Aboriginals to paint using dot methods and that is wasn't their own, the tone used is always negative and derogatory without failing.

Examples of dot art long before the 70's used for millennia







 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...