- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
Well they are at it again today , this time on University places . Christopher Pyne says he is not changing the election promise of not capping places . But the ABC continues to skewer the story and again opens up a comments page so the Leftist nutters can vent and call him a liar. The ABC is clearly out of control and determined to undermine the new Government a every chance.
www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-25/pyne-education-university-fees-student-unions/4979282
CAPS on university places could be reintroduced and compulsory student union fees would be axed under plans to overhaul the higher education system.
Education Minister Christopher Pyne’s office confirmed he was planning the overhaul and said he was considering bringing back caps on university places amid concerns the current demand-driven system was undermining quality.
“There is some evidence that quality is suffering to achieve quantity and it would be madness for us to throw away our international reputation by lessening quality,” he said.
“We will look at whether (the cap) is having an impact on quality.”
Yes,New Ltd more to your liking?
Seriously, the way some of you guys tilt at windmills...
I could say I'm a bit bemused at this thread discussion... but I'm not!
“If one harbors anywhere in one's mind a nationalistic loyalty or hatred, certain facts, though in a sense known to be true, are inadmissable.”
― George Orwell
...to be continued.
New Ltd more to your liking?
Read more: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/natio...up/story-fnii5yv4-1226726700700#ixzz2frnn0txc
Seriously, the way some of you guys tilt at windmills...
Do you have any thoughts of your own whiskers? I'd sure like to hear them - maybe, if not laced with haughty sermonizing and astonishing hypocrisy - rather than all these airy fairy quotations.
Quotations are fine, used sparingly, but FFS!
Yes,
Not because it is biased the other way, but because it doesn't pretend not to be biased. It's a bit like the American commercial networks, biased as hell, but you know what flavour you're getting. They don't pretend to be anything but.
The sanctimonious, pious, purulent and putrid clowns at Pravda, purport to be unbiased. This is intellectual bankruptcy of the highest order.
Even Don Quixote would see the bias.
... to be continued.
Whiskers,
Using quotations is nothing more than a logical fallacy known as appeal to authority.
Another apt quotation; "Does this guy ever shut up?"
He who farts in church sits in his own pew.
Author unknown.
Well, let's consider this in the context of what I said!
Are you not complaining, even getting pretty annoyed, that the abc is biased?
Everyone is biased. There is no escaping that because we are all a product of our experiences and beliefs. Is that not a fact?
So, by definition any organisation or more particularly a programme on abc is biased by the people who produce it. I like their Landline which is biased to the rural sector, arguably the Nationals. They produce a gardening programme that arguably is biased to greens. Their 'The Business' programme is liked by myself and liberal people I know, their 4 Corners programme is generally regarded as quality investigative current affairs programme as is the many scientific and children programs of their production and others.
What are you suggesting... that they and tv generally display another program classification identifying its political bias? Maybe all programs should display a warning like indigenous people request for the deceased and some customary practices... warning this program might be seen as biased by some people.
Is it not more important to detach yourself emotionally from the bias of the presenter or program to work with the content?
I don't see any significant political complaints of bias, or more significantly demands for censuring anyone. Correct me there if I'm wrong. Rather, a competent politician faces bias everywhere, everyday and his/her job is to sway peoples bias to his/her bias.
So, is the issue really about bias or more that you (and some others comments) simply have a strong emotional disposition to people from opposing experiences?
"Our emotional disposition is the tendency towards the type of experience we have."
Well they are at it again today , this time on University places . Christopher Pyne says he is not changing the election promise of not capping places . But the ABC continues to skewer the story and again opens up a comments page so the Leftist nutters can vent and call him a liar. The ABC is clearly out of control and determined to undermine the new Government a every chance.
www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-25/pyne-education-university-fees-student-unions/4979282
The simple suggestion is that the national broadcaster should be apolitical, whereas, as the title of this thread suggests, the ABC is political.
Hmm actually Pyne is looking at capping but its actually a trojan horse for stripping funds out of uni's stay tuned another broken non core promise coming up.
ABC report facts not three worded slogans get use to it folks.
I think some form of capping is required, having a system whereby everyone gets to the top, regardless of ability is stupid.
All that has happened is our education system has fallen to the lowest common denominator.
Labor legislating that make kids stay in school to year 12, has only resulted in a bottleneck of angry, frustrated 17yr olds.
They are expected to recieve 1st year apprentice wages, a first year electrical apprentice earns $274/wk.
The alternative is to stay at school, stay at home and go to Uni. lol
This social engineering project needs shutting down.
The system in place years ago worked well, why not return to the education principles of yester year. Oh sorry that wouldn't be politically correct, in todays world.
In todays world everyone is equal, untill you hit the jobs market, then all the smart ones get jobs.
The rest are left to wallow around in no mans land at 20 years old.
Another appalling interview this morning on ABC NewsRadio with a spokesperson to the Indonesian PM. When the spokesperson said she hadn't details of the policy but could foresee problems if the Australian Navy entered uninvited into Indonesian waters, the interviewer, completely ignoring the fact that Abbott/Bishop had clearly said that our navy will not encroach on Indonesian sovereign waters under its tow back the boats policy, pressed questions on possible conflict if that happened. At no time did the interviewer indicate that that was not Australia's policy, but kept trying to elicit responses that suggested potential for conflict, even though the spokesperson was careful to qualify the circumstances under which that would happen.
A few minutes later in their next cycle of news, they didn't broadcast the interview, but instead claimed that the spokesperson had suggested conflict was possible if Abbott/Bishop pursued their boat people policy, without making reference to the context within which that was said.
Agree, and sums it up.If I don't like what News Limited says I don't have to buy it. I pay for the ABC whether I like it or not, therefore I expect it to be unbiased not peddling an agenda.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?