OK so he got done for contempt of court and has form for fraud and bashing people up.
He's eating porridge not because he is a bastion of free speech, but because he breaks the law.
It's a code of conduct thing right?
OK so he got done for contempt of court and has form for fraud and bashing people up.
He's eating porridge not because he is a bastion of free speech, but because he breaks the law.
It's a code of conduct thing right?
You are so right PZ99.
Tommy breaks the law (breach of contempt of court). In custody, sentenced, in jail within 4 hours (a British record).
Pedophiles and child rapists all over the UK over the last 30 years - still no convictions.
That's not a relevant comparison because it's not the same offense.You are so right PZ99.
Tommy breaks the law (breach of contempt of court). In custody, sentenced, in jail within 4 hours (a British record).
Pedophiles and child rapists all over the UK over the last 30 years - still no convictions.
That's not a relevant comparison because it's not the same offense.
Try replacing emotion with logic.
Here, let me get you started > http://www.thenewsmanual.net/Resources/medialaw_in_australia_03.html
But I'm not innocent am I ? Nothing new there.
Try this one... After the first incident, Davis warned her that he would find her in contempt if she did it again. She did, and in all, the judge issued 20 contempt citations against her and gave her five days in jail for each.
Keep reading > https://www.twincities.com/2012/09/...t-order-for-woman-who-wouldnt-stand-in-court/
So they didn't "first come for Tommy"
No response from ASF constituents that time.
The politics of the ABC, by one of the best journos around.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-09/laura-tingle-why-the-abc-is-a-political-football/9850360
Only problem is ABC has too many segments on Aboriginal history, Feminism and other agendas.
The, not so clever as he thinks, Malcolm Farr on Insiders this morning tried to smear the Government with the statement "very high unemployment". Even his fellow, left biased, panelists had to correct him that it was in fact low unemployment. When he heard this from them, he was most surprised. He obviously believes his own B.S.
The AlpBC is out of control.
5.6% is not "low" unemployment. 3.5% is considered full employment, politicians say 5% is low unemployment so they can dampen public expectations of their performance.
Wait till Bill is in, 5.6 will be considered unprecedentedly low5.6% is not "low" unemployment. 3.5% is considered full employment, politicians say 5% is low unemployment so they can dampen public expectations of their performance.
Wait till Bill is in, 5.6 will be considered unprecedentedly low
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?