Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

ABC is Political

Jump to new
basilio said:
Maybe they are just reporting and highlighting the fact that these two men have adopted and raised six girls from diverse backgrounds over 20 years and the outcomes are a credit to everyone involved.
Click to expand...
Such quaint naivete

As if Pravda didn't move heaven and earth to find a gay couple.

Come on bas!
 
So my little Cynic (thats you Wayne) no matter where the story of the two gay guys who raise 6 adopted girls is promoted it's still rainbow propaganda ?
 
SirRumpole said:
Of all the foster families in the community, the ABC decide to publicise a gay couple on Australian Story.

Political ? Nah.

http://www.abc.net.au/austory/
Click to expand...

Coincidence rumpole. It's kind of like watching an articulate Muslim on "the panel" , amazing that someone like that could grasp the task.

The one half was on the breakfast show too, and he is to be commended for taking in unwanteds and he comes across as earstwhile, but he knows fully well he's using his relationship wards to advance his marital cause. The children are taking second placing and used as ammunition.

There was a time foster children were removed from households where they were being used for gain.
 
sptrawler said:
At last the ABC is doing something sensible.IMO

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/abcs-lateline-axed-reports-20171004-gyumxq.html

If it couldn't become a neutrally balanced programme, it eventually would have to go, it is a shame as the potential was always there.
Click to expand...

When you turn on the ABC in the morning you get Victoria lecturing everyone about the merits and commonsense of SSM, Islam, etc, with Michael being the nodding head, the afternoon is more of the same and then great programs like 7:30 and Lateline also turned into megaphones for the repugnant causes.

I'm fairly sure the charter was factual reporting and investigative journalism, not the incubator and nursery for homosexuals, Islam, ugly people, native racists and misandrists ... that was SBS' job.
 
Tisme said:
When you turn on the ABC in the morning you get Victoria lecturing everyone about the merits and commonsense of SSM, Islam, etc, with Michael being the nodding head, the afternoon is more of the same and then great programs like 7:30 and Lateline also turned into megaphones for the repugnant causes.

I'm fairly sure the charter was factual reporting and investigative journalism, not the incubator and nursery for homosexuals, Islam, ugly people, native racists and misandrists ... that was SBS' job.
Click to expand...

God you talk some absolute sxite Tis. Or is this just an ongoing example of your culturally peculiar humour ? If this language is part of the accepted debate in ASF it's no wonder people come, read and flee.
 
Tisme said:
When you turn on the ABC in the morning you get Victoria lecturing everyone about the merits and commonsense of SSM, Islam, etc, with Michael being the nodding head, the afternoon is more of the same and then great programs like 7:30 and Lateline also turned into megaphones for the repugnant causes.
.
Click to expand...

IMO there is nothing wrong with the subject matter, as it is very current.
I just can't stand the subject being delivered, as you say, "as a personal lecture" rather than a meaningful reflection of the facts.
That really is the whole problem with journalists today, they can't deliver information in a meaningful way, they can only deliver the information from their personal point of view.
This in turn makes the information non factual, unless the journalist has some qualification in the subject matter.
They really have become lost in their own self importance, at the expense of their professionalism. I don't watch any current affairs programme's and very little news, because of the presenters. Unfortunately it isn't channel specific, they are either right wing or left wing, I haven't seen any that just present the facts.
 
Good riddance to Stan (can I have the dark make up please) Grant and his silly program.
He was the goose who recently said that he has never heard of a place called Ayers Rock :thumbsdown:
 
Boggo said:
Good riddance to Stan (can I have the dark make up please) Grant and his silly program.
He was the goose who recently said that he has never heard of a place called Ayers Rock :thumbsdown:
Click to expand...

Yes, hopefully the era of political correctness which allows no one but Journo's to speak, has come to an end.
All it achieved was the radicalization of journalists, who had the right to speak over, or rudely cut off anyone that didn't agree with them.
The last few years, has brought about a culture in journalism, where they feel they are the font of all knowledge.
It bores me $hitless listening to them, re write history, tell us how we should think, vote, live, spend, eat and anything else they can dream up to dribble on about.
 
I'm starting to think good riddance to the ABC in general. Apart from some genuine entertainment, it seem heavily skewed to becoming a marketing tool for neo socialist/liberals.

I can only think management has been infiltrated by cooptive agendas that are at odds with neutral reporting, balanced journalism and traditional Australian value systems.

It's fast becoming an infuriatingly opinionated organisation that will see its own demise as it eventually alienates it's core followers and replaces them with self indulgent airheads demanding social change for the sake of change.
 
Tisme said:
I'm starting to think good riddance to the ABC in general. Apart from some genuine entertainment, it seem heavily skewed to becoming a marketing tool for neo socialist/liberals.

I can only think management has been infiltrated by cooptive agendas that are at odds with neutral reporting, balanced journalism and traditional Australian value systems.

It's fast becoming an infuriatingly opinionated organisation that will see its own demise as it eventually alienates it's core followers and replaces them with self indulgent airheads demanding social change for the sake of change.
Click to expand...

I think you are right up to a point. Maybe when this SSM stuff is decided one way or another they will stop trumpetting it's propaganda and go back to serious reporting. Apart from that issue and the fact that they push indigenous agendas fairly often, I still trust them more than any commercial outlet, as do most of the population, but unfortunately they are dumbing down a lot of their reporting and focussing on the reporter's opinions rather than the facts.
 
SirRumpole said:
I think you are right up to a point. Maybe when this SSM stuff is decided one way or another they will stop trumpetting it's propaganda and go back to serious reporting. Apart from that issue and the fact that they push indigenous agendas fairly often, I still trust them more than any commercial outlet, as do most of the population, but unfortunately they are dumbing down a lot of their reporting and focussing on the reporter's opinions rather than the facts.
Click to expand...


There is no doubt they have better pedigree than the commercial featherweights, but we should be using the same deflection argument style that VC, Bas and Luu use (one wrong justifies another wrong or less wrong is better than a worse wrong)

Four Corners is a living fossil of what the ABC was, News Breakfast is a living fossil of what the mogul commercial stations were.

Compare QANDA first year with QANDA now. Compare Lateline now with Lateline under Kerry O'Brien, etc., et al ... have turned into fluff reporting with a social agenda backbones, rather than fearless reporting and examination:- snowflakes I think is the current term.

It's supposed to "balance between broadcasting programs of wide appeal and specialized broadcasting programs" .... lately there is no balance whatsoever that disagrees with their social dogma. They hide behind the various legislations as reason for being a vehicle for social upheaval and they use the reputation built over a long long time to give the impression of impartiality when statistically they skew their programming content and timing to suit their anti white anti anglo agenda.
 
The ABC is now the official organisational mouthpiece for whingers.

Now it's girls complaining they don't get treated the same as boys. Not FACTS mind you, just their opinions.

It's been all over the Breakfast show today ad nauseum.

The ABC should get a life and go back to reporting things that affect us all. Yesterday they cut off a speech by Alan Finkel at the Energy summit to re-broadcast (for about the tenth time) a story about Catalonian independence. How many Catalonians are there in Australia ffs?
 
SirRumpole said:
The ABC is now the official organisational mouthpiece for whingers.

Now it's girls complaining they don't get treated the same as boys. Not FACTS mind you, just their opinions.

It's been all over the Breakfast show today ad nauseum.

The ABC should get a life and go back to reporting things that affect us all. Yesterday they cut off a speech by Alan Finkel at the Energy summit to re-broadcast (for about the tenth time) a story about Catalonian independence. How many Catalonians are there in Australia ffs?
Click to expand...


Facebook is their other heavy vehicle of getting to the minds of the millenials. As soon as a pidgeon posts a NO case on any one of the multitude of ABC threads promoting SSM there is a swarm of hysterical retards who go to town on their new victim.... these are the same licentious, degenerate imbeciles who have wrongly been given equality to vote, even though they lack the moral fibre to keep our country great and unique.

When Abbott gets back in there is going to be trouble for the ABC big time me thinks.
 
A free kick to 'Crooked' Hillary, provided by our national broadcaster. Watch for all those tough questions about the Clinton Foundation, the private email server, Kosovo terror, the Benghazi attack..

I suspect this will be a soft focus puff piece - Hillary the sisterhood victim, and how that beastly Donald was mean to her.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/
Hillary Clinton
In a special edition of Four Corners, Hillary Clinton, in her only Australian television interview, talks with Sarah Ferguson.

This riveting conversation, recorded in New York, takes us into the heart and mind of the woman at the centre of the most stunning election loss in modern US history.

This is a very different Hillary Clinton to the managed political performer. Candid, open and at times angry, the former presidential candidate talks about what went wrong and her fears for the future.

Watch the Hillary Clinton interview on Monday on Four Corners at 8.30pm.
Wed 11 Oct 2017
Click to expand...
 
Tisme said:
As soon as a pidgeon posts a NO case on any one of the multitude of ABC threads promoting SSM there is a swarm of hysterical retards who go to town on their new victim.... these are the same licentious, degenerate imbeciles who have wrongly been given equality to vote, even though they lack the moral fibre to keep our country great and unique.
Click to expand...
Q&A has opinions streaming at the bottom of the screen which are 90% ill-informed trash. The wise and informed people don't tweet anything so it is a stupid idea. Maybe the ABC see it as a way for the young rebellious (and many of us rebelled at that ill-informed stage of development) to vent their root cause frustration - lack of real sex and amphetamine dependence. The only fix at the moment is to mask tape the lower part of the screen.
 
Top