- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,590
- Reactions
- 7,468
Are you suggesting that communism is the answer for everyone getting decent jobs and better pay?
Communism has failed in Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, even China until they embraced capitalism. Communism has always led to death and disaster; recorded history speaks for itself.
Where did I suggest that ? In any way shape or form where did I say Communism was great ?
Get a grip will ya and stop making up BS assertions.
Between 1950 and 1980 the Western Capitalist model has been capable of providing a very good quality of life for most of its people. It combines the initiative and drive of private enterprise with a solid Government contribution of good governance, national infrastructure support and a legal system which enables all members of society to flourish.
That includes Labour organisations as well because one of the overriding realities of an unfettered capitalist system is that individual workers will always be at the mercy of stronger capitalists. When that happens wages are crushed. People go into poverty The country quickly divides into a rich/poor community.
Of course that doesn't represent a problem for your average billionaire.
I think you're misguided. I would rather live in a world where the individual is free to pursue and seek what they wish; whether it be fortune, fame, glory or knowledge; or a combination there of.
There are no guarantees in life and we don't live in a perfect world.
Capitalism as it stands at the moment, could be more fair to those who are talented and hard working, no question about it; but communism is certainly not the answer, if this is what you're suggesting.
At the end of the day, if someone doesn't want to live in the current system; they are free to find a group of people, buy a plot of land and build their own little self-sustainable community. Capitalism allows this freedom and many people have done it.I don't think for one minute that basilio is suggesting communism, why do people always have to think in extremes ?
From an economic point of view, capitalists can only make money when the masses have the money to buy what they are selling. 60% of Australian consumption is domestic, so the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few is counterproductive to the good of the economy. Money has to keep going around otherwise businesses die. So yes, let as many people as possible get rich because then they spend and keep businesses in business.
PS, I'm not sure this is the right thread to be discussing economics.
We as a collective make people rich. Shopping on Amazon makes Bezos rich; spending time on Facebook makes Zuckerberg rich; buying and using Microsoft products makes Gates rich etc etc. If people are angry that such people are so rich, then they should just not make them richer by contributing to their wealth. In capitalism, the individual is free to live and spend their wealth as they please. Personally I give them credit for their success.I don't think for one minute that basilio is suggesting communism, why do people always have to think in extremes ?
From an economic point of view, capitalists can only make money when the masses have the money to buy what they are selling. 60% of Australian consumption is domestic, so the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few is counterproductive to the good of the economy. Money has to keep going around otherwise businesses die. So yes, let as many people as possible get rich because then they spend and keep businesses in business.
PS, I'm not sure this is the right thread to be discussing economics.
Indeed.I think many are just jealous of other people's success. Most of the top 1% today, in the USA, came from modest wealth. Bezos, Zuckerberg, Gates, Buffett etc. These guys made their fortunes, a great deal of luck, timing and help from others; but they came from little.
At the end of the day, if someone doesn't want to live in the current system; they are free to find a group of people, buy a plot of land and build their own little self-sustainable community. Capitalism allows this freedom and many people have done it.
We as a collective make people rich. Shopping on Amazon makes Bezos rich; spending time on Facebook makes Zuckerberg rich; buying and using Microsoft products makes Gates rich etc etc. If people are angry that such people are so rich, then they should just not make them richer by contributing to their wealth. In capitalism, the individual is free to live and spend their wealth as they please. Personally I admire these guys, and give them credit for their success.
That's correct. Individuals who choose to use their products. Which collectively makes them rich. Another example is buying movie tickets because you like an actor. If no one bought a movie ticket because a certain actor was in a film, then the actor would be poor; if many individuals choose to buy a movie ticket because a certain individual is in a movie; then we collectively make the actor rich. Another example is music artists or athletes.Collective ? We are all individuals !
The same applies to corporations. The individual is free to choose if they want to buy the brand of coffee they desire, free to buy the airfare from the airline that they choose, free to bank with their favourite bank, free to study at which university that they wish etc etc etc.Indeed.
But they quickly become corporatists like others.
Absolutely, we live in a capitalist society that is governed by democracy.They also have the freedom to form political parties , get people to vote for them , get into government and change the system.
Democracy allows this freedom and many people have done it.
That is why Australians enjoy one of the highest basic wages and one of the best welfare states in the World, the only problem is, those who enjoy it dont realise it.I don't think for one minute that basilio is suggesting communism, why do people always have to think in extremes ?
From an economic point of view, capitalists can only make money when the masses have the money to buy what they are selling. 60% of Australian consumption is domestic, so the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few is counterproductive to the good of the economy. Money has to keep going around otherwise businesses die. So yes, let as many people as possible get rich because then they spend and keep businesses in business.
PS, I'm not sure this is the right thread to be discussing economics.
I would rather live in a world of capitalism, with all its imperfections, than a communist world where everyone is dead poor.
That's true. Castro, Stalin, Kim, Mao and Maduro lived/live in luxury while their people starved/starve to death.Not everyone is dead poor, the ruling party are very comfortable thank you
If you checked out the graph I posted and the website you would see that pre 1980 economic progress had been made across the whole economy. Since then whether it was the US, USSR/Russia the countries wealth has flowed to the richest and hang the rest.
Can't incite a riot, so staffer has to do it?We have the usual provocateurs trying to kick start violence amongst protesters.
Noticed it coming from the top by leftist twats.
Blacks are not your pawns. Don't hijack their issues to further your own.
Don't try and whip up any further division you flog. You ain't the one that wears the cost.
Can't incite a riot, so staffer has to do it?
One of the two women charged with defacing a Captain Cook statue in Sydney's Hyde Park has been identified as a part-time worker within Greens MP David Shoebridge's office.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?