Thanks for that poll counter, dr smith.
It seems a few in Victoria in safe Labor seats may be going down.
Music to my ears this morning with this headline
Labor heading for landslide loss
One more day to go
+1. ABC devoted about three days to commentary and interviews with predictable subjects over Mr Abbott's light hearted comment about Fiona Scott having sex appeal.
For god's sake, it was a throw away remark between friends.
Rudd even dramatically declared if such a remark had been made in the commercial workplace, it would be so serious as to merit the resignation of the person making the remark.
This sort of absolute rubbish has typified Kevin Rudd's whole campaign, i.e. massive overreach.
They have persisted in claiming a $70 billion black hole for the Opposition in the face of absolutely no evidence for this. Even today, with the costings largely presented, Rudd was still refusing to admit this was wrong.
He must think the average voter is a complete idiot.
As drsmith notes below, they have not cut back on foreign aid at all, simply reduced the rate at which foreign aid is increased in order to improve vitally necessary infrastructure here in Australia.
You are misunderstanding the purpose of my correction. The difference is important. Labor has been busily saying the Coalition is 'cutting foreign aid'. That is completely different from not increasing foreign aid.Julia, call it what you like but it is still a saving of $4.5 billion plus the saving on interest on money that would have had to been borrowed from the Chinese to fund it.
It is sad that you have to pin prick on such a statement I made. It just does not become of you.
You are misunderstanding the purpose of my correction. The difference is important. Labor has been busily saying the Coalition is 'cutting foreign aid'. That is completely different from not increasing foreign aid.
Would you prefer to go along with Labor's implied suggestion that the Coalition are actually withdrawing already budgeted aid?
Labor has been busily saying the Coalition is 'cutting foreign aid'. That is completely different from not increasing foreign aid.
I just looked it up on Waterhouse, he has:Betfair has Libs at $1.05. I guess this is ok value. I should have been on much sooner but didn't even think of it.
Where did you see/hear/read that ?Kevin Rudd has threatened to stay on if he loses the election but retains his seat. The voters of Griffith have a big responsibility. Only they, can rid us of this serial liar. I think they will do the right thing for the country.
Don't be silly. I don't have to be any sort of 'authority' to simply report what the policy is, rather than go along with the impression the ABC is trying so hard to make.Of course I would not prefer to go along with Labor's suggestion.
That is a ridiculous statement to make. I was referring to the $4.5 Billion saving.
I don't really understanding why you are purporting to be an authority on the subject or are you doing it just to belittle me.
Not at all. When you hear Tim Costello and others lamenting the fact that the viciousness and cruelty of the Coalition's policy of cutting foreign aid will result in hundreds of thousands of children dying, and other emotive stuff, they need to not be permitted to get away with such a wrong assertion.You appear to be trying to make something out of nothing.
The ABC (News Radio) have been saying the same thing all morning. About 1 in every 10 of their statements regarding the Libs foreign aid policy say they are cutting the INCREASE in foreign aid, but the 9 in between blatantly simply say they are cutting foreign aid. I have never heard it so bad. It is not just the foreign aid issue, but many other issues. Almost all their coverage has been using Labor spokespeople commenting on Liberal policy, with no attempt made to allow the Libs to comment. You might as well have Albanese running the show.
Where did you see/hear/read that ?
I'd like to see the expression on his face when he said that. That would be like the expression someone would have when at the moment when they realise they can't walk on water.
Withy the betting odds, Sportsbet is $1.03 to $11 in favour of the Coalition, but interestingly, the handicap has blown out to 34.5 seats and the shortest odds for seats won by the major parties are in the 50's for Labor and the 90's for the Coalition.
Don't be silly. I don't have to be any sort of 'authority' to simply report what the policy is, rather than go along with the impression the ABC is trying so hard to make.
Not at all. When you hear Tim Costello and others lamenting the fact that the viciousness and cruelty of the Coalition's policy of cutting foreign aid will result in hundreds of thousands of children dying, and other emotive stuff, they need to not be permitted to get away with such a wrong assertion.
No one is cutting existing foreign aid. They are simply reducing the previously scheduled increase in it.
If you can't see how relevant that difference is, there's nothing more I can do to explain it to you.
See bellenuit's post below.
Fat lady has been singing for weeks and has left the building.
Abbott will smash Rudd and Rudd will lose his own seat.
20 seat loss min.
You heard it first from the DUCK!
That debate's been long since had and long since won and lost.I just have a bit of a concern with the LNP not putting their most popular (and arguably most respected) leader to the public and they haven't played their most respectful and strongest policy hand.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?